In:Nominalization in Languages of the Americas:
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 301–340
Chapter 7The ‘relative’ illusion and the origin of non-subject nominalizers in Cahita (Uto-Aztecan)
Published online: 8 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.07gon
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.07gon
This paper proposes to analyze non-subject relative clauses in Cahita languages (†Tehueco, Yaqui, and Mayo, from the Uto-Aztecan family) as non-subject grammatical nominalizations used as appositives in restrictive appositions. This analysis is based on a diachronic perspective which considers the origin of the markers involved in these constructions as well as the evolutionary paths that lead to the relativization function. The study shows that the different origins proposed for non-subject nominalizers in Cahita (a possessed nominal classifier, a subject nominalizer, a directional postposition, and a locative postposition) are all different types of nominal markers indicating that the base clause/verb is treated as a nominal constituent; that is, that the construction has been nominalized. As for the evolution to the relativization function, the first nominalization uses of these markers are always associated with a referential function and the modifying function corresponds to a secondary development made via apposition, indicating that non-subject relativization in Cahita corresponds in fact to a specialized function of the non-subject nominalization: the modifying function of a possessed non-subject nominalization used as an appositive in a restrictive apposition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The nominalization approach to relativization
- 2.1The notion of nominalization
- 2.2The notion of relativization
- 2.3The notion of apposition
- 2.4The nominalization/relativization syncretism
- 2.5Terminological problems in the domain of RCs
- 2.6The origin of the nominalization/relativization syncretism
- 3.The Cahita language(s)
- 4.Non-subject nominalizations in Cahita
- 4.1Old Cahita
- 4.2Modern Cahita
- 4.2.1Yaqui
- 4.2.2Mayo
- 5.The origin of the Cahita non-subject nominalization markers
- 5.1The origin of the suffix -ye
- 5.2The origin of the suffixes -’u/-’Vwi in Yaqui and in Mayo
- 5.3An alternative source for the suffix -’u in Yaqui
- 5.3.1The suffix -u in Old Cahita
- 5.3.1.1Former agent nominalizer
- 5.3.1.2Former attribuand nominalizer
- 5.3.1.3Action/result nominalizer
- 5.3.2The suffix -’u in Yaqui
- 5.3.1The suffix -u in Old Cahita
- 6.Final remarks
Abbreviations Notes References
References (56)
Álvarez González, Albert. 2016. The evolution of grammatical nominalizations in Cahita languages. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 107–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018. Apuntes sobre el Manual para administrar a los Indios del idioma Cahita los Santos Sacramentos. In Las lenguas en México: Diálogos historiográficos, Barbara Cifuentes & Rodrigo Martinez Baracs (eds), 211–232. Mexico: IIB UNAM/Somehil.
. 2012. Relative clauses and nominalizations in Yaqui. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas. A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 67–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Álvarez González, Albert & Felix Quesada, Rafael Jesús. 2011. Morfología derivativa y variación lingüística en cahita. In Estudios morfológicos, sintácticos, semánticos y de lingüística aplicada [Colección Estudios Lingüísticos 3], Maria del Carmen Morúa Leyva & Gerardo López Cruz (eds), 47–76. Hermosillo: University of Sonora.
Andrews, Avery D. 2007. Relative clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 206–236. Cambridge: CUP.
Buelna, Estaquio. 1989[1890]. Arte de la lengua cahita por un padre de la Compañía de Jésus. Mexico: Editorial Siglo XXI.
Campbell, Lyle & Langacker, Ronald. 1978. Proto-Aztecan vowels: Parts I-III. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: 85–102, 197–210, 262–279.
Comrie, Bernard & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Relativization strategy. In World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS), Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 494–497. Oxford: OUP.
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 349–398. Cambridge: CUP.
Cristofaro, Sonia 2019. Nominalization in diachronic cross-linguistic perspective. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 124], Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani & David W. Fleck (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Dakin, Karen. 1991. Nahuatl direct and mediated possession: A historical explanation for irregularities. International Journal of American Linguistics 57(3): 298–329.
Dedrick, John M. & Casad, Eugene H. 1999. Sonora Yaqui Language Structures. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Escalante, Fernando. 1990. Voice and Argument Structure in Yaqui. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
Givón, T. 2012. Toward a diachronic typology of relative clause. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas. A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 3–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2009, The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Guerrero, Lilian. 2012. On relative clauses and related constructions in Yaqui. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas. A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 97–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 3. Journal of Linguistics 4(2):179–215.
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 576–601. Oxford: Blackwell.
. 2009. From nominal to clausal morphosyntax: Complexity via expansion. In Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 102], T. Givón & Masoyoshi Shibatani (eds), 23–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Frederike. 1991. Grammaticalization. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299.
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 141–170. Cambridge: CUP.
Kubo, Yoshihiro. 2009. A note on two types of apposition. The Bulletin of Central Research Institute Fukuoka University, Series A: Humanities 9(7): 27–35.
Launey, Michel. 1981. Introduction à la langue et à la littérature aztèques, Vol. 1: Grammaire. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Luján, Eugenio R. & Ruiz Abad, César. 2014. Semantic roles and word formation: Instrument and location in Ancient Greek. In Perspectives on Semantic roles. [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 241–269. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martínez Fabián, Constantino & Langendoen, D. Terrence. 1996. Sobre las llamadas cláusulas relativas en yaqui. In Memorias del tercer encuentro de lingüística en el Noroeste, Tomo 1: Lenguas indígenas, Vol. 2, Zarina Estrada-Fernández, Max Figueroa Esteva & Gerardo López Cruz (eds), 443–464. Hermosillo: Editorial Unison.
Miller, Wick R. 1986. Sketch of Shoshone, a Uto-Aztecan language. In Handbook of American Indians, Vol. 17: Languages, Ives Goddard (ed.), 693–720. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute.
Miller, Wick R. 1984. The classification of the Uto-Aztecan languages based on lexical evidence. International Journal of American Linguistics 50(1): 1–24.
Moctezuma, José Luis & López, Gerardo. 1990. Variación dialectal yaqui-mayo. Noroeste de México 9: 84–105.
. 1994. En torno a la dialectología cahita. In Estudios de lingüística y sociolingüística, José Luis Moctezuma & Gerardo López (eds), 221–274. Hermosillo: University of Sonora/INAH.
Omamor, Augusta P. 1978. Case grammar and viability. In Valence, Semantic Case and Grammatical Relations [Studies in Language Companion 1], Werner Abraham (ed.), 261–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Peña Valenzuela, Ana Patricia. 2012. Cláusulas relativas en el mayo de Sonora. MA thesis, University of Sonora.
Seiler, Walter. 1985. Imonda, a Papuan Language. Canberra: Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–848.
. 2009. Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t it. The case of relativization. In Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], T. Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Nominalization. Workshop presented during the Seminario de Complejidad Sintáctica, 15–16 November. Hermosillo: University of Sonora.
. 2019. What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 124], Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani & David W. Fleck (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Awadh Bin Makhashen, Khaled. 2009. Nominalization in Soqotri, a South Arabian language of Yemen. In Endangered Languages: Contributions to Morphology and Morpho-syntax, Leo W. Wetzels (ed.), 9–31. Leiden: Brill.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick. 2011. Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
