In:Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 349–398
Grammatical relations in Telkepe Neo-Aramaic
Published online: 5 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.10cog
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.10cog
This chapter describes grammatical relations in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic. Telkepe Neo-Aramaic has nominative-accusative alignment. The core arguments that can be clearly distinguished are subject, direct object of a transitive verb, dative object of a ditransitive verb and theme of a ditransitive verb. Core grammatical relations are predominantly encoded on the verb and there is no case-marking, while word order is conditioned not by syntactic roles but by information structure. Up to three arguments may be indexed on the verb, but only subjects are always indexed on the verb. In certain constructions, specific semantic roles may be indexed: one suffix may index a goal, affectee or human source, while another indexes location or metaphorically expresses ability. Telkepe exhibits a type of differential object marking, conditioned by definiteness and topicality and manifested in two separate ways: indexing on the verb and (less consistently) flagging of the object with a dative preposition. Telkepe shows an unusual inversion in the syntactic roles of the indexes on verbs. The suffix set which indexes the subject in Present Base forms indexes the object in Past Base forms, while the suffix set which indexes the object in Present Base forms indexes the subject in Past Base forms.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Telkepe neo-aramaic
- 1.2The telkepe verbal system
- 1.3The argument–adjunct continuum
- 2.Indexes of participants on verbs
- 2.1Indexes on simplex verbs
- 2.2Indexes on analytical verb forms
- 3.Predicate types
- 3.1Introduction
- 3.2Intransitive predicates
- 3.2.1One-place intransitive predicates with subject indexing
- 3.2.2Intransitives with a referential but non-indexed sole argument
- 3.2.3Two-place intransitive predicates with second argument indexed
- 3.2.3.1With intransitive subject not indexed
- 3.2.3.2Two-place intransitive predicates with both intransitive subject and second argument indexed
- 3.2.4Two-place intransitive verbs with non-indexed independent complement
- 3.2.5Copulaic expressions
- 3.2.6Intransitive predicates with non-referential subjects
- 3.3Transitive verbs
- 3.3.1Two-place transitive verbs with indexed object
- 3.3.2Excursus on development of inversion
- 3.3.3Two-place transitive verbs with an object NP
- 3.3.4Transitive verbs with covert object
- 3.3.5Three-place transitive verbs with argument indexed by B-suffix
- 3.3.6Redundant L-suffix with impersonal use of ʕjb I ‘to please’
- 3.3.7Three-place transitive verbs with non-indexed third participant
- 3.3.8Labile verb lexemes
- 3.3.9Three-place ditransitive verbs
- 3.3.10Two-place ditransitive verbs with covert T or R
- 3.4Analytical verb forms
- 4.Syntactic behaviour of participants in the verb phrase
- 4.1Triggering of indexing
- 4.2Word order
- 4.3Alignment in flagging of independent arguments
- 4.4Agreement of participles in analytical verb forms
- 4.5Imperatives
- 4.6Complement control
- 4.7Valency alternations and causativization
- 4.8Passivization
- 4.9Relativization
- 5.Conclusions
- Glosses, abbreviations and symbols
Notes References
References (33)
Aramaic Bible Translation. 2006. The New Testament in Chaldean, 1st edn. Chicago IL: Aramaic Bible Translation.
Bickel, Balthasar, Iemmolo, Giorgio, Zakharko, Taras & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2013. Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. In Languages across Boundaries: Studies in the Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 15–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Borghero, Roberta. 2005. The evolution of the verbal system in the North Eastern Neo-Aramaic of Ashitha. In Studi Afroasiatici. XI Incontro Italiano di Linguistica Camitosemitica, Alessandro Mengozzi (ed.), 325–336. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
. 2008. The verbal system of the Neo-Aramaic dialect of Karimlesh. In Neo-Aramaic Dialect Studies, Geoffrey Khan (ed.), 81–89. Piscataway: Gorgias.
Coghill, Eleanor. 2004. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Alqosh. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
. 2010a. The development of prospective aspect in a group of Neo-Aramaic dialects. Diachronica 27(3): 359–410
. 2010b. Ditransitive constructions in the Neo-Aramaic dialect of Telkepe. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 221–242. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2018. Information structure in the Neo-Aramaic dialect of Telkepe. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in Prosody and Syntax, Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), 297–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology, 1st edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cowell, Mark W. 1964. Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic: Based on the Dialect of Damascus. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Creissels, Denis. 2014. Cross-linguistic variation in the treatment of beneficiaries and the argument vs. adjunct distinction. Linguistic Discovery 12(2): 41–55.
Forker, Diana. 2014. A canonical approach to the argument/adjunct distinction. Linguistic Discovery 12(2): 27–40.
Guidi, Ignazio. 1883, Beiträge zur Kenntnis des neuaramäischen Fellīḥī-Dialektes. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 37: 293–318.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–567.
. 2013. Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms. In Languages across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hoberman, Robert D. 1989. The Syntax and Semantics of Verb Morphology in Modern Aramaic: A Jewish Dialect of Iraqi Kurdistan. New Haven CT: American Oriental Society.
Joosten, Jan. 1989. The function of the so-called dativus ethicus in Classical Syriac. Orientalia 58: 473–492.
. 1996. The Syriac Language of the Peshitta and Old Syriac Versions of Matthew: Syntactic Structure, Inner-Syriac Developments and Translation Technique. Leiden: Brill.
Letuchiy, Alexander. 2009. Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience L. Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 247–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maclean, Arthur J. 1901. A Dictionary of the Dialects of Vernacular Syriac as Spoken by the Eastern Syrians of Kurdistan, North-West Persia, and the Plain of Mosul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mengozzi, Alessandro. 2002a.
Israel of Alqosh and Joseph of Telkepe, A story in a truthful language: religious poems in vernacular Syriac (North Iraq, 17th Century), Vol. I: Text and Glossary
[Corpos Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium, 589, Scriptores Syri Tomus 230]. Leuven: Peeters.
. 2002b. Israel of Alqosh and Joseph of Telkepe, A Story in a Truthful Language: Religious Poems in Vernacular Syriac (North Iraq, 17th Century), Vol. II: Introduction and Translation. (= Corpos Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium, 590, Scriptores Syri Tomus 231.) Leuven: Peeters.
Rubba, Johanna. 1993a. Discontinuous morphology in modern Aramaic. PhD dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
. 1993b. Forms derived from verbal roots in Tisqoopa Modern Aramaic. In Semitica: Serta philologica Constantino Tsereteli dicata, Riccardo Contini, Fabrizio Pennacchietti & Mauro Tosco (eds), 115–126. Turin: Silvio Zamorani.
Sabar, Yona. 1978. From Tel-Kepe (A Pile of Stones) in Iraqi Kurdistan to Providence, Rhode Island: The story of a Chaldean immigrant to the U.S.A in 1927. Journal of the American Oriental Society 98(4), 410–415.
. 1993. A folktale and folk songs in the Christian Neo-Aramaic dialect of Tel-Kēpe (Northern Iraq). In Semitica: Serta philologica Constantino Tsereteli dicata, Riccardo Contini, Fabrizio Pennacchietti & Mauro Tosco (eds), 289–297. Turin: Silvio Zamorani.
