In:Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 69–106
Grammatical relations in Sanzhi Dargwa
Published online: 5 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.03for
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.03for
This chapter analyses grammatical roles in Sanzhi Dargwa, a Nakh-Daghestanian language spoken in central Daghestan (Russian Federation). It also provides an overview on argumenthood and valency patterns. Sanzhi Dargwa combines head marking and dependent marking. It has a rich case inventory and two independently operating agreement systems: gender/number agreement and person agreement. Sanzhi has ergative alignment at the morphological level, namely in the gender/number agreement and the case marking. Outside the realm of morphology there are almost no indications for ergativity. Instead, accusative alignment, neutral alignment and no alignment are found. Person agreement and reflexivization/reciprocalization are neutral. In contrast, relativization largely depends on a suitable context and does not make use of grammatical roles at all.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Sanzhi Dargwa
- 1.2The argument/adjunct distinction
- 1.3Predicate classes and valency
- 2.Previous studies on grammatical relations in the Nakh-Daghestanian languages
- 3.Head marking: Agreement
- 3.1Gender/number agreement
- 3.2Person agreement
- 4.Dependent marking: Case
- 5.Imperatives
- 6.Conjunction reduction
- 7.Complement control
- 8.Reflexives and reciprocals
- 8.1Reflexive constructions
- 8.2Reciprocal constructions
- 9.Causativization
- 10.Relativization
- 11.Antipassive
- 12.Quantifier floating
- 13.Summary
Abbreviations Notes References
References (43)
Chumakina, Marina, Kibort, Anna & Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Determining a language's feature inventory: Person in Archi. In Endangered Languages [Special issue of Linguistische Berichte 14], Peter K. Austin & Andrew Simpson (eds), 143–172. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Comrie, Bernard. 2004. Oblique-case subjects in Tsez. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Kareumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 113–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Comrie, Bernard, Forker, Diana & Khalilova, Zaira. 2011. Alignment typology, reflexives, and reciprocals in Tsezic languages. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 37: 32–51.
Crisp, Simon. 1983. Subject marking in some languages of Daghestan. Paper in Linguistics 16: 203–216.
Daniel, Michael & Lander, Yury. 2012. Relative clauses and processing complexity. Talk at the conference “Typology, Theory: Caucasus”. Istanbul.
Foley, William A. & Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
Forker, Diana. 2011. Grammatical relations in Hinuq. In Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus. Papers from the International Conference “Current Advances in Caucasian Studies”, Macerata, January 21–23, 2010, Vittorio Tomelleri, Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds), 553–567. Berlin: Otto Sagner.
. 2017. Ergativity in Nakh-Daghestanian. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds), 851–872. Oxford: OUP.
Ganenkov, Dimitry, Maisak, Timur & Merdanova, Solmaz. 2008. Non-canonical agent marking in Agul. In Differential Subject Marking, Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart (eds), 173–198. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ganenkov, Dmitry. 2013. Diachrony of experiencer subject marking. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 231–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. In Press. Gender agreement alternation in Aqusha Dargwa: A case against information structure. Studies in Language.
Givón, Talmy. 1997. Introduction. In Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective[Typological Studies in Language 35] Talmy Givón (ed.), 1–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1991. On the question of deep ergativity: The evidence from Lezgian. Papiere zur Linguistik 44–45: 5–27.
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 1996. The syntax of personal agreement in East Caucasian languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49(2): 127–148.
Kalinina, Elena & Sumbatova, Nina. 2007. Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 183–249. Oxford: OUP.
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1985. Toward a typology of ergativity. In Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause: Some Approaches to Theory from the Field, Johanna Nichols & Anthony C. Woodbury (eds), 268–323. Cambridge: CUP.
1997. Beyond subject and object: Towards a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1(3): 279–346.
1999a. Èmfatičeskoe mestoimenie wuž
. In Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 620–629. Moscow: Nasledie.
1999b. Reflexives and emphasis in Tsaxur. In Reflexives: Form and Function, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 40], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Walker [Curl] (eds), 227–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2001. Anaforičeskie sredstva. In Bagvalinskij jazyk, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 615–681. Moscow: Nasledie.
Manning, Christopher. 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Molochieva, Zarina & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2008. Grammatical relations in Chechen. Talk given at the University of Leipzig.
. 2008. Case in Ingush syntax. In Case and Grammatical Relations: Studies in Honor of Bernard Comrie [Typological Studies in Language 81], Greville G. Corbett & Michael P. Noonan (eds), 57–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schulze, Wolfgang. 2007. Personalität in den ostkaukasischen Sprachen.
Munich Working Papers in Cognitive Typology 4. Munich: IATS University.
Sumbatova, Nina. 2011. Person hierarchies and the problem of person marker origin in Dargwa: Facts and diachronic problems. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 313–160. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
. 2013. Tipologičeskoe i diaxroničeskoe issledovanie morfosintaksisa (na primere jazykov darginskoj gruppy). Doctoral dissertation, RGGU Moscow.
Sumbatova, Nina R. & Lander, Yury A. 2014.
Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: Grammatičeskij očerk, voprosy sintaksisa [The Dargwa dialect of Tanti; A grammatical sketch. Problems of syntax]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul'tur.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2011. Detelicization and argument suppression: Evidence from Godoberi. Linguistics 49(1): 135–174.
van den Berg, Helma. 1999. Gender and person agreement in Akusha Dargi. Folia Linguistica 33(1–2): 153–168.
Cited by (36)
Cited by 36 other publications
Arkadiev, Peter & Yury Lander
Beguš, Gašper
Belyaev, Oleg
Borise, Lena
Borise, Lena
Demirok, Ömer & Balkız Öztürk
Dobrushina, Nina, Michael Daniel & Yuri Koryakov
Erschler, David
Erschler, David
Foley, Steven
Ganenkov, Dmitry
Ganenkov, Dmitry & Natalia Bogomolova
Ganenkov, Dmitry & Timur Maisak
Kazenin, Konstantin
Komen, Erwin R., Zarina Molochieva & Johanna Nichols
Koryakov, Yuri
O’Herin, Brian
Maria Polinsky
Rostovtsev-Popiel, Alexander
Testelets, Yakov G.
Öztürk, Balkız & Ömer Eren
Heaton, Raina
Forker, Diana
2016. Gender in Hinuq and other Nakh-Daghestanian languages. International Journal of Language and Culture 3:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Forker, Diana
Forker, Diana
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
