In:Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages
Edited by Simon E. Overall, Rosa Vallejos and Spike Gildea
[Typological Studies in Language 122] 2018
► pp. 295–314
Chapter 11Possessive semantic relations and construction types in Kukama-Kukamiria
Published online: 21 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.11val
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.11val
Abstract
This study examines the correlations between possessive semantic relations and construction types in Kukama-Kukamiria (Amazon of Peru). The language does not have lexical verbs such as ‘have’, ‘belong,’ or a copula to predicate ownership. Yet possession can be inferred from other constructions, including: a predicate nominal construction with two juxtaposed NPs in which the possessor is encoded in the first NP, and the possessed in the second NP; an existential construction in which the possessor and possessed elements are expressed within an NP; and a combination of the existential and locative construction in which the possessor is expressed in the locative phrase, and the possessed in the NP. Heine (1997) predicts that the equative schema will encode physical possession; the existence schema, permanent and inalienable possession; whereas the location schema, physical and temporary possession. An examination of a text corpus reveals that Heine’s predictions are partially confirmed. Importantly, the equative construction encodes permanent ownership, which suggests that this is the most conventionalized linguistic expression of possession in Kukama-Kukamiria.
Article outline
- 1.The Kukama-Kukamirias
- 1.1Ownership among the Kukama-Kukamirias
- 1.2The language and the data
- 2.Semantic possession relations and construction types
- 3.Possession in Kukama-Kukamiria
- 3.1Equative construction
- 3.2Existential constructions
- 3.2.1Existential genitive
- 3.2.2Existential topic
- 3.2.3Existential locative
- 4.Summary and conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (13)
Barker, Chris. 2011. Possessives and relational nouns, Ch. 45. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn, & Paul Portner (eds), 1009–1130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baron, Irène, Herslund, Michael & Sørensen, Finn. 2001. Dimensions of Possession [Typological Studies in Language 47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Obligatory possessive inflection. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. <[URL]> (3 March 2013).
Mithun, Marianne. 2001. The difference a category makes in the expression of possession and inalienability. In Baron, Herslund & Sørensen (eds), 143–168.
Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. <[URL]> (13 April 2015).
Vallejos, Rosa. 2009. The focus function(s) of =pura in Kokama-Kokamilla discourse. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(3): 399–432.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
