In:Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages
Edited by Simon E. Overall, Rosa Vallejos and Spike Gildea
[Typological Studies in Language 122] 2018
► pp. 53–84
Chapter 2Nonverbal predication and the nonverbal clause type of Mojeño Trinitario
Published online: 21 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.02ros
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.02ros
Abstract
Mojeño Trinitario, an Arawak language spoken in Bolivia, makes frequent use of clauses without a verb or a copula. These encode some of the most common semantic types of nonverbal predication – equation, inclusion, attribution (as understood by Payne 1997), but also typologically neglected types, like quantification and temporality. Possession, existence, and two unattested semantic types – motion-presentational and quantified existential, are actually encoded in Mojeño Trinitario with verbal clauses and copular clauses. The non-copular nonverbal constructions present a very regular morphosyntactic pattern, even though they make use of predicates that belong to different classes (nouns, adjectives, adverbs, numerals, demonstratives and prepositional phrases). These constructions can be subsumed under a major clause type distinct from the verbal clause type, and are characterized by a nonverbal predicate either juxtaposed to its argument, or standing by itself if it is suffixed with a person index. Nonverbal clauses share some properties with verbal clauses, like some of the inflectional morphology (e.g. negation, plural, TAM), but they however neatly differ in three respects – constituent order, argument indexing, and irrealis marking. In conclusion, Mojeño Trinitario shows a nonverbal clause type clearly distinct from the verbal clause type, and this draws a robust major distinction among lexical classes between on the one hand, verbs, and on the other hand, non-verbs (nouns, adjectives, adverbs, and numerals).
Keywords: clause type, copula, parts-of-speech, word order, Arawak
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Grammar overview
- 3.The expression of nonverbal predication in Mojeño Trinitario
- 3.1Equation (or identity)
- 3.2Inclusion
- 3.3Attribution
- 3.4Quantification
- 3.5Location
- 3.6Temporality
- 3.7Existence
- 3.7.1The basic existential construction
- 3.7.2Motion-presentationals
- 3.7.3Quantified existential
- 3.8Possession
- 4.The nonverbal clause type of Mojeño Trinitario
- 4.1Properties shared with the verbal clause type
- 4.2Properties specific to the nonverbal clause type
- 5.Conclusion
Notes Abbreviations References
References (27)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 1999. The Arawak language family. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 65–106. Cambridge: CUP.
Bowerman, Melissa & Pederson, Eric. 1992. Topological Relations Picture Series. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale: Une introduction typologique, Vol. 1: Langues et syntaxe. Paris: Lavoisier.
. 2013. Existential predication in typological perspective. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Split.
Danielsen, Swintha & Granadillo, Tania. 2008. Agreement in two Arawak languages: Baure and Kurripako. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 396–411. Oxford: OUP.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Clause types. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224–275. Cambridge: CUP.
Durand, Tom. 2016. L’intransitivité scindée dans les langues arawak, PhD dissertation, INALCO, Paris.
Frachtenberg, Leo J. 1922. Coos. In Handbook of America Indian Languages, Vol. II, Franz Boas (ed.). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
Gast, Volker & Haas, Florian. 2011. On the distribution of subject properties in formulaic presentationals of Germanic and Romance. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.
Marbán, Pedro. 1702. Arte de la lengua Moxa, con su Vocabulario, y Cathecismo, Lima: Imprenta Real de Joseph de Contreras.
Merlan, Francesca. 1985. Split intransitivity: Functional oppositions in intransitive inflection. In Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause, Johanna Nichols & Anthony Woodbury (eds), 324–262. Cambridge: CUP.
New Tribes Mission. 2002. Eto ’chojriicovo mue ’ma viya (The New Testament). Sanford: New Tribes Mission.
Olza Zubiri, Jesús, Nuni de Chapi, Conchita & Tube, Juan. 2002. Gramática Moja Ignaciana, Caracas: Universidad Católica Andres Bello.
Payne, Thomas. 1996. Estatividad y movimiento. In Estudios lingüísticos de textos de la Amazonia peruana, Mary Ruth Wise (ed.), 221–268. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, Perú.
Rose, Françoise. 2011a. Morphological and prosodic structure of the Trinitario verb. Paper presented at the Americanist Meeting: Word-formation in South American Languages, University of Leipzig, 24 June.
. 2011b. Who is the third person ? Fluid transitivity in Mojeño Trinitario. In special issue Argument-encoding Systems in Bolivian Amazonian Languages. Antoine Guillaume & Françoise Rose (eds). International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4): 469–494.
. 2014a. Irrealis and negation in Mojeño Trinitario. In Negation in Arawak Languages, Lev Michael & Tania Granadillo (eds), 216–240. Leiden: Brill.
. 2014b. When vowel deletion blurs reduplication in Mojeño Trinitario. In Reduplication in South-American Languages, Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein van der Voort (eds), 375–399. Leiden: Brill.
. 2015a. Associated motion in Mojeño Trinitario: Some typological considerations. Folia Linguistica 49(1): 117–158.
. 2015b. Innovative complexity in the pronominal paradigm of Mojeño. A result of contact? In Borrowed Morphology, Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds), 241–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Fabre, Alain
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Luca Ciucci & Margherita Farina
2019. Two types of morphologically expressed non-verbal predication. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 120 ff.
Rose, Françoise
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
