In:Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 403–424
Chapter 12Generic person marking in Japhug and other Gyalrong
languages
Published online: 26 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.12jac
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.12jac
Abstract
This paper discusses the history of generic person marking systems in
several Gyalrong languages. While closely related, Japhug and
Tshobdun differ considerably: the inverse prefix marks generic A in
Japhug, while it appears in the generic P form in Tshobdun. We
propose a historical scenario to explain how such radically
different systems came into being, proposing in particular that one
of the generic human markers was grammaticalized from a nominalizer,
and show that our reconstruction can also explain the origin of the
local scenario portmanteau 1→2 and 2→1 prefixes. These
reconstructions allow us to establish the existence of several
previously unattested grammaticalization pathways.
Keywords: Gyalrong, Japhug, Tshobdun, Situ, inverse, generic, passive, grammaticalization, hierarchical agreement, nominalization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Inverse and generic marking in Japhug
- 2.1The verbal paradigms
- 2.2Inverse in non-local scenarios
- 2.3Generic marking
- 2.4Inclusive vs exclusive generic marking
- 3.Nominalization in Japhug
- 3.1Overview of participle prefixes in Japhug
- 3.2Nominalization and generic
- 4.
Tshobdun and Situ
- 4.1Generic person marking and nominalization in Tshobdun
- 4.2Generic person marking and nominalisation in Situ
- 5.Historical perspectives
- 5.1From nominalization to generic marking
- 5.2The origin of the local scenario portmanteau prefixes
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (32)
Bickel, Balthasar, Gaenzle, Martin, Rai, Arjun, Shoj Rai, Prem, Rai, Shree Kumar, Rai, Vishnu & Sharma, Narayan P. 2007. Two ways of suspending object agreement in Puma:
Between incorporation, antipassivization, and optional
agreement. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 7: 1–19.
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. The category of direction in
Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1): 83–101.
Dryer, Matthew. 1994. The discourse function of the Kutenai
inverse. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 65–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 2011. Ute Reference Grammar [Culture and Language Use. Studies in Anthropological
Linguistics 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gong, Xun. 2014. Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong
(Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1): 44–60.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive
morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du japhug
(Rgyalrong). PhD dissertation, Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot.
. 2012a. Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and
Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1): 83–116.
. 2012b. Argument demotion in Japhug
Rgyalrong. In Ergativity, Valency and Voice, Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds), 199–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2014a. Clause linking in Japhug
Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 263–327.
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton. 2014. Direct / inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7): 301–318.
Konnerth, Linda. 2016. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman *gV- nominalizing prefix. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area, University of Oregon 39(1): 3–32.
. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung
(Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 271–285.
Lin, Youjing. 2009. Units in Zhuokeji rGyalrong Discourse: Prosody
and Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Lín, Xiàngróng (林向榮). 1993. Jiāróngyǔyánjiū 嘉戎語研究 (A study on the Rgyalrong language).
Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.
Michailovsky, Boyd, Mazaudon, Martine, Michaud, Alexis, Guillaume, Séverine, François, Alexandre & Adamou, Evangelia. 2014. Documenting and researching endangered languages:
The Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 8: 119–135.
Sansò, Andrea. Under review. Nominalization-based voice constructions as a
cross-linguistic type.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2000. Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba
rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1): 161–190.
2003. Caodeng rGyalrong. In The Sino-Tibetan languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), 490–502. London: Routledge.
2014. Typology of generic-person marking in Tshobdun
Rgyalrong. In Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics:
Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text, Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds), 225–248. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
2015. 黑水縣沙石多嘉戎語動詞人稱範疇的特點 (Remarkable features in the
verb agreement system of Sastod Rgyalrong in Khrochu
county). Language and Linguistics 16(5): 731–750.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Lin, Youjing. 2007. Constructional variation in rGyalrong
relativization: How to make a choice? In Pre-Conference Proceedings of the International Workshop
on Relative Clauses, 205–226. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shi, Danluo. 2002. Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de
yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語法現象 (Empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong
grammar). Language and Linguistics 3(1): 79–99.
Wei, Jie-Wu. 2001. Verbal prefixation in Zhuokeji Rgyalrong: The
problem of kə-/ka- alternation. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Zhang, Shuya. To appear. From proximate/obviative to number marking:
Reanalysis of hierarchical indexation in rgyalrong
languages. Journal of Chinese Linguistics.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Jacques, Guillaume & Thomas Pellard
2021. Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis. Diachronica 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pons, Marie-Caroline
2021. On the origin of 2nd person prefix #tV- in Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 44:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
DeLancey, Scott
2018. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP
indexation. In Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 345 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
