In:Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 345–376
Chapter 10Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP
indexation
Published online: 26 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.10del
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.10del
Abstract
The study of hierarchical argument indexation systems shows that
while the ranking of both 1st and 2nd person over other arguments is
robust and reliable, it is impossible to find any compelling
crosslinguistic evidence for one or the other ranking of the two
Speech Act Participants, and rare to find a consistent ranking even
within a single language. This paper assembles and reviews
historical changes in the indexation of the “local” categories (1→2
and 2→1) in a number of Tibeto-Burman languages. We see that the
fundamental deictic ranking SAP > 3 is conservative, and inverse
marking to emphasize that ranking has been reinvented several times
in the family. Changes in the marking of local categories are more
diverse, but two phenomena recur independently in different
languages and branches: a tendency for the 1→2 form to be uniquely
marked, sometimes with forms which are not synchronically relatable
to anything else in the paradigm, and a contrasting tendency for the
2→1 form to merge with the marking of 3→1. I propose that these
tendencies reflect what I call sociopragmatic effects, i.e.
the socially delicate nature of any and all natural utterances
involving both the speaker and the addressee.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Problems of hierarchy
- 2.1The structure of hierarchical paradigms
- 2.2Problems of local indexation
- 2.3Accounts of hierarchy
- 2.4Sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman morphological change
- 3.Deictic effects in hierarchical systems
- 3.1The original inverse in Rgyalrongic
- 3.2Innovative inverses in Northern Naga
- 4.Sociopragmatic effects in hierarchical indexation systems
- 4.1Merger of 1O forms in Kiranti
- 4.2The “marked scenario”
- 5.Deictic and sociopragmatic effects
- 5.1Reviewing the evidence
- 5.2Typology, genre, and person
- 5.3Patterns
- 5.4 Sociopragmatic just-so stories: It’s always about you
Notes Abbreviations References
References (73)
Barnard, John Terence Owen. 1934. A Handbook of the Rawang Dialect of the Nung
Language. Rangoon: Supdt., Govt. Printing and Stationery.
Bauman, James. 1975. Pronouns and Pronominal Morphology in
Tibeto-Burman. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. On the scope of the referential hierarchy in the
typology of grammatical relations. In Case and Grammatical Relations, Greville Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bickel, Balthasar, Iemmolo, Giorgio, Zakharko, Taras & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2013. Patterns of alignment in verb
agreement. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna
Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 15–36. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin. 2015. First person objects, antipassives, and the
political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and
Linguistics 2(1): 63–86.
Bynon, Theodora. 1998. Inverse direction and second person in
Dumi. In Typology of Verbal Categories, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 85–93. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Caughley, Ross. 1978. Participant rank and verbal cross-reference in
Chepang. In Papers on discourse, Joseph Grimes (ed.), 163–78. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
. 1982. The Syntax and Morphology of the Verb in
Chepang [Pacific Linguistics Series B, no. 84]. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Egophoricity in discourse and
syntax. Functions of Language 7: 33–77.
DeLancey, Scott. 1981a. An interpretation of split ergativity and related
patterns. Language 57(3): 626–57.
. 1981b. The category of direction in
Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1): 83–101.
. 1985. The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in
Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated
change. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 367–389. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Towards a history of verb agreement in
Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1): 1–38. <[URL]> (24 April
2014).
. 2011a. Agreement prefixes in
Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 10(1): 1–35. <[URL]> (24 April
2014).
. 2011b. Nocte and Jinghpaw: Morphological
correspondences. In North East Indian Linguistics 3, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds), 61–75. New Delhi: Foundation/CUP India.
. 2013. Argument indexation (verb agreement) in
Kuki-Chin. presented at the 46th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan
Languages and Linguistics, Dartmouth College. <[URL]> (10 November
2015).
. 2014. Second person verb forms in
Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1): 3–33.
van Driem, George. 1988. The verbal morphology of Dumi Rai
simplicia. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(1): 134–207.
Ebert, Karen. 1987. Grammatical marking of Speech Act Participants in
Tibeto-Burman. Journal of Pragmatics 11(4): 473–482.
. 1990. On the evidence for the relationship
Kiranti-Rung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 13(1): 57–58.
. 1991. Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti
languages: Evidence from Belhare. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1): 73–92.
. 1994. The Structure of Kiranti Languages [Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
13]. Zurich: Universität Zurich.
Filimonova, Elena. 2005. The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking:
Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9(1): 77–113.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Jirsa, Bill. 2006. The Principle of Indirect Means in language use
and language structure. Journal of Pragmatics 38(4): 513–542.
Genetti, Carol. 1988. Notes on the structure of the Sunwari transitive
verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(2): 62–92.
Gildea, Spike. 1994. Semantic and pragmatic inverse: ‘Inverse
alignment’ and ‘inverse voice’ in Carib of
Surinam. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed), 187–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gildea, Spike & Jansen, Joana. 2018. The development of referential hierarchy effects
in Sahaptian. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and
Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Givón, T. 1994. The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional
and typological aspects of inversion. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gong, Xun. 2014. The personal agreement system of Zbu Rgyalrong
(Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1): 44–60.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1991. Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix
paradigms. In Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection, Frans Plank (ed.), 75–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 1998. Pragmatic skewing in 1 ←→ 2 pronominal
combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(2): 83–104.
Henderson, Eugénie Jane Andrina. 1965. Tiddim Chin: A Descriptive Analysis of Two
Texts. London: Oxford University Press.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du japhug
(Rgyalrong). PhD dissertation, Université Paris VII.
. 2012. Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrong and
Kiranti. Languages and Linguistics 13(1): 83–116.
. 2018. Generic person marking in Japhug and other
Gyalrong languages. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and
Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton. 2014. Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7): 301–318.
. 2018. The direction(s) of analogical change in
direct/inverse systems. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and
Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
Jacques, Guillaume, Lahaussois, Aimée, Michailovsky, Boyd & Bahadur Rai, Dhan. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal
morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6): 1095–1170.
King, John. 2002. Marked transitive scenarios and archaic biactinal
agreement morphology in Dhimal. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34: 39–69.
Konnerth, Linda. 2015. A new type of convergence at the deictic center:
Second person and cislocative in Karbi
(Tibeto-Burman). Studies in Language 39(1): 24–45.
Lahaussois, Aimee. 2003. Thulung Rai. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 1: 1–25. <[URL]> (10 November
2015).
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung
(rGyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 271–285.
LaPolla, Randy. 2010. Hierarchical person marking in the Rawang
language. In Forty Years of Sino-Tibetan Language Studies:
Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, Dai Zhaoming (ed.), 107–113. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang University Press.
Lo, Ch’ang-p’ei. 1945. A preliminary study on the Trung language of Kung
Shan. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 8: 343–8.
Lockwood, Hunter & Macaulay, Monica. 2012. Prominence hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass 6–7: 431–446.
Macaulay, Monica. 2009. On prominence hierarchies: Evidence from
Algonquian. Linguistic Typology 13(3): 357–389.
Morey, Stephen. 2016. The internal diversity of Tangsa: Vocabulary and
morphosyntax. In Language and Culture in Northeast India and Beyond: In
Honor of Robbins Burling, Mark Post, Stephen Morey & Scott DeLancey (eds), 23–40. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of
Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Payne, Doris. 1994. The Tupí-Guaraní inverse. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox, & Paul Hopper (eds), 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sharma, H Surmangol. & Singh, N. Gopendro. 2011. Person-marking prefixes of Purum. In North East Indian Linguistics 3, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds), 61–75. New Delhi: Foundation/CUP India.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and
ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
. 1983. Wo guo zang-mian yu dungci-de rencheng fanchou
(The category of personal agreement of the verb in
Tibeto-Burman languages of China). Minzu Yuwen 1983(2): 17–29.
. 1984. Woguo bufen ZangMianyu zhong mingci de rencheng
lingshu fanchou (The personal possessive category of nouns
in some Tibeto-Burman languages of China). Zhongyang Minzu Xuebao 1984(1): 78–84.
Sun, Jackson Tianshin. 2014. Typology of generic-person marking in Tshobdun
Rgyalrong. In Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics:
Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text, Richard Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds), 225–248. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Sun, Jackson Tianshin & Shi, Danluo. 2002. Caodeng Jiarongyu yu “rentong dengdi” xiangguan
de yufa xianxiang (The Empathy Hierarchy in Caodeng
rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics 3(1): 79–99.
Sun, Jackson Tianshin & Qianzi, Tian. 2013. Huoeryu Gexihua dongci dueixie (Verb agreement in
Gexi Horpa). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 7(2): 221–241.
Thompson, Chad. 1990. On the treatment of topical objects in Chepang:
Passive or inverse? Studies in Language 14(2):405–427.
Toba, Sueyoshi. 1979. Khaling (Asian and African Grammatical Manual 13d).
Tokyo: Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku.
Weidert, Alfons. 1985. Paradigmatic typology and verb agreement
analysis. In Studia Linguistica Diachronica et Synchronica: Werner
Winter Sexagenario Anno MCMLXXXIII, Ursula Pieper & Gerhard Stickel (eds), 903–936. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, Zakharko, Taras, Bierkandt, Lennart, Zúñiga, Fernando & Bickel, Balthasar. 2016. Decomposing hierarchical alignment: Co-arguments
and conditions on alignment. Linguistics 54(3): 531–561.
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2006. Deixis and Alignment: Inverse Systems in Indigenous
Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Barotto, Alessandra & Andrea Sansò
DeLancey, Scott
Jacques, Guillaume & Thomas Pellard
2021. Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis. Diachronica 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Konnerth, Linda
Konnerth, Linda & Andrea Sansò
Gildea, Spike & Joana Jansen
2018. The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian. In Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 131 ff.
Guillaume, Antoine
2018. From ergative case-marking to hierarchical agreement. In Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 217 ff.
Ozerov, Pavel
2018. Tone assignment and grammatical tone in Anal (Tibeto-Burman). Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 708 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
