In:Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 353–377
Chapter 15The ‘essive’ in Eastern Khanty
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.15fil
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.15fil
Abstract
This chapter presents a corpus-based research, supplemented by elicitation with the last speakers, into the distribution of a marker referred to as the ‘translative’ in Eastern Khanty. The description of the properties of this marker follows the linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and/or translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the marker in the essive sense (associated with state) is contrasted with it use in expressing the translative sense (associated with change). Finally, the syntactic position of elements marked by this form is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The Khanty language
- 1.2The data
- 1.3The typological profile of Eastern Khanty
- 1.4The Eastern Khanty case system
- 2.Non-verbal predication
- 3.Secondary predication
- 4.Predicative complements
- 5.Adverbials
- 6.Temporality and location
- 7.Comparative and simile expressions
- 8.Translative vs. essive
- 9.Word order
- 10.Conclusion and final remarks
Notes Data References
References (36)
“Ski-tracks”Vasyugan KhantyST: “Ski-tracks”, 2005. Vasyugan Khanty. Recorded A. Filchenko. Tomsk archive.
“Three sons”Vasyugan KhantyTS: “Three sons”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Tretyakov 2010).
“Syvsiki and Alvali”Vasyugan KhantyS&A: “Syvsiki and Alvali”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Tretyakov 2010).
“Girls”Vasyugan KhantyGirls: “Girls”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Tretyakov 2010).
“Big Pike”Vasyugan KhantyBP: “Big Pike”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Tretyakov 2010).
“Man and Eagle”Vasyugan KhantyM&E: “Man and Eagle”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Tretyakov 2010).
“Bird and Mouth”Vasyugan KhantyB&M: “Bird and Mouth”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Tretyakov 2010).
“Boy”Vasyugan KhantyBoy: “Boy”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Kurganskaja 2012).
“Father and Son”Vasyugan KhantyF&S: “Father and Son”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Potanina, Tonoyan, Kurganskaja 2012).
“Funny young bear”Vasyugan KhantyFYB: “Funny young bear”, 2005. Vasyugan Khanty. Recorded A.Filchenko. Tomsk archive.
“Eastern Khanty Negation Questionnaire”A. Filchenko, S. KovylinEKhNeg: “Eastern Khanty Negation Questionnaire”, 2012, adapted and recorded A. Filchenko, S. Kovylin.
“Predicate Possessors Questionnaire”Vasyugan KhantyPredicate Possessors: “Predicate Possessors Questionnaire”, 2013, Vasyugan Khanty. Recorded A.Filchenko. Tomsk archive.
“Essive Questionnaire”Vasyugan KhantyEaKhEssive: “Essive Questionnaire”, 2013, Vasyugan Khanty. Recorded A.Filchenko. Tomsk archive.
“Eastern Khanty Negation Questionnaire”Vasyugan KhantyEKhNegation: “Eastern Khanty Negation Questionnaire” 2013: Vasyugan Khanty. Recorded S.Kovylin, A.Filchenko. Tomsk archive.
“Elks”Vasyugan KhantyElks: “Elks”, Vasyugan Khanty (Filchenko, Kovylin, Potanina, Tonoyan 2015).
Filchenko Andrey. 2012. Continuity of information structuring strategies in Eastern Khanty: Definiteness/topicality. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Soloviev (eds), 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:
Fichenko, Andrey. 2013. Asymmetric negation in Eastern Khanty and Southern Selkup. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics & Anthropology. 2(2): 29–50.
Filchenko, Andrey. 2015. Negation in Eastern Khanty. In Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language 108], Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm & Beáta Wagner-Nagy (eds), 159–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:
Himmelmann, Nikolaus, Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: an introduction. In: Secondary predication and adverbial modification: The typology of depictives. Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds). 1–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:
Kalinina, L. 1976. Skazki i bytovye teksty (Vasjugan) // Skazki narodov Severa. T. Porotova (eds). Ch-2. 124–138. Tomsk.
Kuznetsov, P. M. 2005. Adjectival Modifiers in Khanti Dialects // Tomsk State Pedagogical. University Bulletin. Issue 4(48). 83–87.
Mymrina D. 2006. Kategorija padezha v dialektax xantyjskogo jazyka: Sopostavitel’nyj aspect. Diss. kand.filol.n. Tomsk: TSPU.
Potanina, O. & Filchenko, A. 2007. Postpositions in Eastern Khanty//Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. Issue 4(67). 63-70.
Tereškin, Nikolajčno. 1961. Očerki dialektov hantyjskogo jazyka: Vahovskij dialekt (Review of Khanty Dialects: Vakh Dialect). Leningrad: Nauka.
Tereškin, Nikolajčno. 1981. Slovar vosto-hantyjskix dialektov (Dictionary of Eastern Khanty Dialects). Leningrad: Nauka.
Serebrennikov, B. A. 1964. Osnovnie linii razvitija padezhnoj i glagolnoj system v uralskikh jazykax. Moscow: Nauka.
Volodin A. P. 2000. Bezakkuzativnost’ kak tipologicheskaja dominant uralskix jazykov (na material finskogo). In Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii prepodavatelej i aspiantov, posvjaschennoj 75-letiju kafedry finno-ugorskoj filologii SPbGU, 28–37. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.
