In:Egophoricity
Edited by Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe and Lila San Roque
[Typological Studies in Language 118] 2018
► pp. 437–471
Chapter 14Learning how to know
Egophoricity and the grammar of Kaluli (Bosavi, Trans New Guinea), with special reference to child language
Published online: 25 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.14san
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.14san
Abstract
Languages with egophoric systems require their users to pay special attention to who knows what in the speech situation, providing formal marking of whether the speaker or addressee has personal knowledge of the event being discussed. Such systems have only recently come to be studied in cross-linguistic perspective. This chapter has two aims in regard to contributing to our understanding of egophoric marking. Firstly, it presents relevant data from a relatively under-described and endangered language, Kaluli (aka Bosavi), spoken in Papua New Guinea. Unusually, Kaluli tense inflections appear to show a mix of both egophoric and first vs non-first person-marking features, as well as other contrasts that are broadly relevant to a typology of egophoricity, such as special constructions for the expression of involuntary experience. Secondly, the chapter makes a preliminary foray into issues concerning egophoric marking and child language, drawing on a naturalistic corpus of child-caregiver interactions. Questions for future investigation raised by the Kaluli data concern, for example, the potentially challenging nature of mastering inflections that are sensitive to both person and speech act type, the possible role of question-answer pairs in children’s acquisition of egophoric morphology, and whether there are special features of epistemic access and authority that relate particularly to child-adult interactions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background on the Kaluli language and data sources
- 3.Verbal inflections and egophoric patterns
- 3.1Present
- 3.1.1Basic distribution
- 3.1.2Examples from child-adult interactions: Present
- 3.2Future
- 3.2.1Basic distribution of the future inflections
- 3.2.2Examples from child-adult interactions: Future
- 3.2.3Note on ‘teasing’ present and future forms
- 3.3Intentive and immediate future inflections
- 3.1Present
- 4.Summary and conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (64)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Slobin, Dan I. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 159–167. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Bendix, Edward H. 1993. The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: Interactional manipulation of evidential categories in Newari. In Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine (eds), 226–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bickel, Balthazar & Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, rev. 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burton, Sarah & Mitchell, Peter. 2003. Judging who knows best about yourself: Developmental change in citing the self across middle childhood. Child Development 74: 426–444.
Creissels, Denis. 2008. Language documentation and verb inflection typology: The case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Presented at Chronos 9, Paris.
. 2002b. Types of interaction between evidentials and first-person subjects. Anthropological Linguistics 44: 178–196.
de Villiers, Jill & Garfield, Jay. 2009. Evidentiality and narrative. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16: 191–217.
de Villiers, Jill, Garfield, Jay, Gernet-Girard, Harper, Roeper, Tom & Speas, Margaret. 2009. Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125: 29–47.
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2): 379–421.
Evans, Nicholas. 1996. Grammaticizing the knower: Towards a partial typology of person effects on predicates. Plenary, Third Australian Linguistics Institute, The Australian National University.
. 2003. Context, culture and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 13–40.
. 2012. Nen assentives and the phenomenon of dialogic parallelism. In Practical Theories and Empirical Practice: A Linguistic Perspective [Human Cognitive Processing 40], Andrea C. Schalley (ed.), 159–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Garrett, Edward J. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Gopnik, Alison & Graf, Peter. 1988. Knowing how you know: Young children’s ability to identify and remember the sources of their beliefs. Child Development 59: 1366–1371.
Grosh, Sylvia & Grosh, Andrew. 2004. Grammar essentials for the Kaluli language. Ms. <[URL]>
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A, 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5: 1–48.
Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29.
Kelly, Barbara & Nordlinger, Rachel. 2014. Fieldwork and first language acquisition. In Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013, Lauren Gawne & Jill Vaughan (eds), 178–192. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Labov William & Fanshel, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic Press.
Lehmann, Christian. 2011. Speech act participants in modality. <[URL]>
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. <[URL]>
Loughnane, Robin. 2009. A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne. <[URL]>
Matsui, Tomoko & Fitneva, Stanka A. 2009. How do we know what we know: Evidentiality in cognitive development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125: 1–11.
Montrul, Silvina. 2004. The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and Adult L2 Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moore, Leslie C. 2012. Language socialization and repetition. In The Handbook of Language Socialization, Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 209–226. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 50: 186–198.
Post, Mark. 2013. Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103], Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds), 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reesink, Ger P. 1987. Structures and Their Functions in Usan: A Papuan Language of Papua New Guinea [Studies in Language Companion Series 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roberts, John R. 2001. Impersonal constructions in Amele. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikenvald, Robert M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 201–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robinson, Elizabeth J., Butterfill, Stephen A. & Nurmsoo, Erika. 2011. Gaining knowledge via other minds: Children’s flexible trust in others as sources of information. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29: 961–980.
Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-speaking Peoples, Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds), 15–65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Rubino, Rejane B. & Pine, Julian M. 1998. Subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: What low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language 25: 35–59.
1977. A Comparative Study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole Languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Rumsey, Alan. 2003. Language, desire, and the ontogenesis of intersubjectivity. Language & Communication 23: 169–187.
Rumsey, Alan, San Roque, Lila & Schieffelin, Bambi B. 2013. The acquisition of ergative marking in Kaluli, Ku Waru and Duna (Trans New Guinea). In The Acquisition of Ergativity [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 9], Edith L. Bavin & Sabine Stoll (eds), 133–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
San Roque, Lila. 2008. An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robyn. 2012a. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16: 111–167.
. 2012b. Inheritance, contact and change in the New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia: Special Issue 2012 Part II, 397–427.
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186–187: 120–143. .
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1985. The acquisition of Kaluli. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Dan I. Slobin (ed.), 525–593. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1986. Teasing and shaming in Kaluli children’s interactions. In Language Socialization across Cultures, Bambi B. Schieffelin & Elinor Ochs (eds), 165-181. New York: Cambridge University Press.
1990. The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1996. Creating evidence: Making sense of the written word in Bosavi. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra Thompson (eds), 435–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2007. Found in translating: Reflexive language across time and texts. In Consequences of Contact: Language Ideologies and Sociocultural Transformations in Pacific Societies, Miki Makihara & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 140–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2008. Speaking only your own mind: Reflections on confession, gossip, and intentionality in Bosavi (PNG). Anthropological Quarterly 81(2): 431–441.
Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Feld, Steven. 1998. Bosavi-English-Tok Pisin Dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Simpson, Jane. 2004. From common ground to syntactic construction: Associated path in Warlpiri. In Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture, Nicholas J. Enfield (ed.), 287–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tanz, Christine. 1980. Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Against the concept of ‘Conjunct’/’Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy J. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37: 240–263.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Sandman, Erika & Karolina Grzech
2022. Egophoricity and evidentiality: Different categories, similar discourse functions. Interactional Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Ward, Shannon M.
Robbins, Joel
San Roque, Lila & Bambi B. Schieffelin
2019. Perception verbs in context. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 347 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
