In:Egophoricity
Edited by Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe and Lila San Roque
[Typological Studies in Language 118] 2018
► pp. 153–172
Chapter 5Egophoricity and differential access to knowledge in Yongning Na (Mosuo)
Published online: 25 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.05lid
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.05lid
Abstract
Yongning Na, a Tibeto-Burman language close to Lolo-Burmese, is spoken in southwestern China within the Sinitic, Himalayan, and mainland Southeast Asian linguistic areas. Na has a non-canonical egophoric system which differs from other systems in the area, such as those of Tibetan and Newar, with respect to the ways that person patterns within the system; the forms that marking takes; and the way that the system is leveled in the interrogative. Instead of a two-way distinction with respect to person, Na makes a three-way distinction: first person statements can be made unequivocally; second person ‘statements’ are formed as interrogatives; and third person statements are qualified, with the form of qualification dependent upon verbal semantic class: volitional, internal state, or observable state (Lidz 2007). These coding distinctions represent a grammaticalization of the differential access to knowledge in speech interactions among first, second, and third persons. Marking indicates whether the first, second, or third person subject has direct access to knowledge under assertion. In Na, the relevant forms include evidential particles, a future marker, and an interrogative construction, rather than copulas or verbal morphology. Differential access to knowledge and evidentiality are tightly entwined in Na, which is perhaps not surprising as the two encode closely related concepts: differential access to knowledge marks direct versus indirect access to knowledge, while evidentiality marks source of knowledge (Aikhenvald 2004). The Na system does not occur in the interrogative mood, in distinct contrast with attested egophoric systems.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Volitional verbs
- 3.Internal state verbs
- 4.Observable state verbs
- 5.Interrogatives
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (17)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2):1–11.
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20]. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25: 39–62.
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2): 379–422. .
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A. No. 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5: 1–48.
Lidz, Liberty. 2010. A Descriptive Grammar of Yongning Na (Mosuo). PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Matisoff, James A. 1993. Sangkong of Yunnan: Secondary “verb pronominalization” in Southern Loloish. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 16: 123–140.
Michaud, Alexis. 2017. Tone in Yongning Na: Lexical tones and morphotonology. [Studies in Diversity Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press.
. 2011. The tones of numerals and numeral-plus-classifier phrases: On structural similarities between Naxi, Na and Laze. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(1): 1–26.
Michaud, Alexis. 2008. Phonemic and tonal analysis of Yongning Na. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(2):159–196.
Thurgood, Graham. 1986. The nature and origins of the Akha evidentials system. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20]. Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 214–222. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tournadre, Nicholas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/ ‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Zhang, Sihong & Jie Chen
2024. A typological study on person sensitivity in Ersu. Asian Languages and Linguistics 5:2 ► pp. 337 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
