Cover not available

In:Egophoricity
Edited by Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe and Lila San Roque
[Typological Studies in Language 118] 2018
► pp. 153172

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (17)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2):1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20]. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25: 39–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2): 379–422. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A. No. 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5: 1–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lidz, Liberty. 2010. A Descriptive Grammar of Yongning Na (Mosuo). PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Evidentiality in Yongning Na (Mosuo). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2): 45–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1993. Sangkong of Yunnan: Secondary “verb pronominalization” in Southern Loloish. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 16: 123–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis. 2017. Tone in Yongning Na: Lexical tones and morphotonology. [Studies in Diversity Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The tones of numerals and numeral-plus-classifier phrases: On structural similarities between Naxi, Na and Laze. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(1): 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis. 2008. Phonemic and tonal analysis of Yongning Na. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 37(2):159–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1986. The nature and origins of the Akha evidentials system. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20]. Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 214–222. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/ ‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watters, David. 2006. The conjunct-disjunct distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics 22: 300–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zhang, Sihong & Jie Chen
2024. A typological study on person sensitivity in Ersu. Asian Languages and Linguistics 5:2  pp. 337 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue