In:Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Yvonne Treis and Martine Vanhove
[Typological Studies in Language 117] 2017
► pp. 143–164
Chapter 5The deictic identification of similarity
Published online: 31 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.06kon
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.06kon
Abstract
Starting out from the observation that comparisons and assessments of similarity and difference are fundamental cognitive processes and play an important role in a variety of human activities, this article shows that the most basic verbal means for the expression of similarity are demonstratives of manner, quality and degree (French ainsi, tel, tellement). It is shown that the gestural (exophoric) use of such demonstratives provides the source of a wide variety of constructions in a wide variety of languages, so that these demonstratives are instantiations of a semantic category of “similatives” par excellence. Building on earlier work by the same author, the article analyses and describes the wide-spread processes of grammaticalisation leading from exophorically used demonstratives to various types of anaphors, to quotatives, conjunctional adverbs, comparative constructions and to affirmative or approximative particles. The illustrations provided for these pervasive changes are mainly taken from European languages, but occasionally also enriched by exemplification from languages outside of Europe.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Similarity in cognition and language structure
- 2.Demonstratives: General framework of analysis
-
3.Demonstratives of similarity: Manner, quality, degree
- (i)Distinctions in the ontological dimension
- (ii)Distinctions in the deictic domain
- (iii)Simple vs. complex demonstratives
- 4.Meaning, semantic change and the grammaticalisation of similative and equative constructions
- 4.1The exophoric use: Loss and renewal
- 4.2From exophoric to anaphoric uses
- 4.3From anaphora to clausal connectives
- 4.4From anaphoric/cataphoric to comparative
- 4.5From cataphoric to quotative
- 4.6The recognitional and the approximative uses
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (25)
Anderson, Stephen & Keenan, Edward. 1985. Deixis. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 259–308. Cambridge: CUP.
Buchstaller, Isabelle & van Alphen, Ingrid (eds.) 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language Communication Research 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Form, Functions and Grammaticalisation [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (4): 463–489.
. 2012. Bühler’s two field theory of pointing and naming and the deictic origins of grammatical morphemes. In Grammaticalisation and Language Change. New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 37–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27 (1): 61–112.
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda. 1998. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Hole, Daniel & Klumpp, Gerson. 2000. Definite type and indefinite token: The article son in Colloquial German. Linguistische Berichte 182: 231–244.
König, Ekkehard. 1982. Scalar particles in German and their English equivalents. In The Contrastive Grammar of English and German, Walter F. W. Lohnes & Edwin Hopkins (eds.), 76–101. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.
. 2012. Le rôle des déictiques de manière dans le cadre d’une typologie de la deixis. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris CVII : 11–42.
Letuchiy, Alexander B. 2012. On some properties of sentential arguments in Russian. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 5.
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 1997. Grammaire du futunien. Nouméa: Centre de Documentation Pédagogique de Nouvelle-Calédonie.
Robert, Stéphane. 1998. Espace déictique, espace syntaxique et prédication: les indices spatiaux du wolof. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists Paris, 20-25 July 1997, Bernard Caron (ed.), CD Rom, Oxford: Elsevier.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1968. A theory of conditionals. In Studies in Logical Theory, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 98–112. Oxford: OUP.
Streek, Jürgen. 2002. Grammars, words, and embodies meanings: On the uses and evolution of so and like. Journal of Communication 52: 581–596
Treis, Yvonne. 2008. A Grammar of Kambaata (Ethiopia). Part 1: Phonology, Morphology and Non-Verbal Predication. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Umbach, Carla. 2007. The role of so in equative comparison, Syntax and Semantics Conference CSSP, Paris.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Guz, Wojciech
Magni, Elisabetta & Ottavia Cepraga
Janebová, Markéta & Michaela Martinková
KALTENBÖCK, GUNTHER & ELNORA TEN WOLDE
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2022. On the development of OE swā to ModE so and related changes in an atypical group of demonstratives. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 309 ff.
Oleniak, Mariana
Nunez, Joseph Jean François
Chamoreau, Claudine
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
