In:Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Yvonne Treis and Martine Vanhove
[Typological Studies in Language 117] 2017
► pp. 9–32
Chapter 1Equative constructions in world-wide perspective
Published online: 31 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.02has
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.02has
Abstract
In this paper, we report on a world-wide study of equative constructions (‘A is as big as B’) in a convenience sample of 119 languages. From earlier work, it has been known that European languages often have equative constructions based on adverbial relative pronouns that otherwise express degree or manner (‘how’, ‘as’), but we find that this type is rare outside Europe. We divide the constructions that we found into six primary types, four of which have closely corresponding types of comparative constructions (‘A is bigger than B’). An equative construction often consists of five components: a comparee (‘A’), a degree-marker (‘as’), a parameter (‘is big’), a standard-marker (‘as’), and a standard (‘B’).
Most frequently, the parameter is the main predicate and the equative sense is expressed by a special standard-marker. But many languages also have a degree-marker, so that we get a construction of the English and French type. Another possibility is for the equality sense to be expressed by a transitive ‘equal’ (or ‘reach’) verb, which may be the main predicate or a secondary predicate. And finally, since the equative construction is semantically symmetrical, it is also possible to “unify” the parameter and the standard in the subject position (‘A and B are equally tall’, or ‘A and B are equal in height’). But no language has only a degree-marker, leaving the standard unmarked. Finally, we note some word order correlations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Equative constructions
- 2.European similatives and equatives based on manner words
-
3.The primary types of equative constructions
- 3.1Type 1: Only equative standard-marker
- 3.2Type 2: Equative degree-marker and standard-marker
- 3.3Type 3: Equative degree-marker unified
- 3.4Type 4: Primary reach equative
- 3.5Type 5: Primary reach equative unified
- 3.6Type 6: Secondary reach equative
- 4.Comparing equative and comparative constructions
- 5.Examples of the primary types
- 5.1Type 1: Only equative standard-marker
- 5.2Type 2: Equative degree-marker and standard-marker
- 5.3Type 3: Equative degree-marker unified
- 5.4Type 4: Primary reach equative
- 5.5Type 5: Primary reach equative unified
- 5.6Type 6: Secondary reach equative
- 6.Other ways of expressing identity of degree
- 7.No general equative construction
-
8.Cross-linguistic generalizations
- 8.1A missing pattern
- Generalization 1.
-
8.2Word order in equative constructions
- Generalization 2.
- Generalization 3.
- 8.1A missing pattern
- 9.Conclusion
Notes Special abbreviations Appendix References
References (53)
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1983. Word Order Typology and Comparative Constructions [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Crane, Thera M., Hyman, Larry M. & Nsielanga Tukumu, Simon. 2011. A Grammar of Nzadi [B865]: A Bantu Language of Democratic Republic of Congo [University of California Publications in Linguistics 147]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Crass, Joachim. 2005. Das K’abeena: Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochlandostkuschitischen Sprache [Cushitic Language Studies 23]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Curnow, Timothy. 1997. A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquier): An Indigenous Language of South-western Colombia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
Dhongde, Ramesh Vaman & Wali, Kashi. 2009. Marathi [London Oriental and African Languages Library 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2008. Comparative constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 32 (4): 787–817.
Durie, Mark. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. [Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut Voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 112]. Dordrecht: Foris.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, Eric. 2005. A Grammar of Mina [Mouton Grammar Library 36]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna. 1994. Introducing lexical primitives. In Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings [Studies in Language Companion Series 25], Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds), 31–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963[1966]. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, 2nd edn, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86 (3): 663–687.
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda. 1998. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. A Grammar of Koyra Chiini, the Songhay of Timbuktu [Mouton Grammar Library 19]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2005. A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali) [Mouton Grammar Library 35]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Henkelmann, Peter. 2006. Constructions of equative comparison. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59 (4): 370–398.
Kari, Ethelbert E. 2004. A Reference Grammar of Degema [Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen 22]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Kung, Susan Smythe. 2007. A Descriptive Grammar of Huehuetla Tepehua. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York NY: Routledge.
Mennecier, Philippe. 1995. Le tunumiisut, dialecte inuit du Groenland oriental: Description et analyse. Paris: Klincksieck.
Meyer, Ronny. 2005. Das Zay: Deskriptive Grammatik einer Ostguragesprache (Äthiosemitisch) [Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen 25]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 1995. Le xârâcùù langue de Thio-Canala, Nouvelle-Calédonie: Éléments de syntaxe [Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 10]. Leuven: Peeters.
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria. 2001. A Grammar of Udihe [Mouton Grammar Library 22]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nose, Masahiko. 2009. The expressions of comparative and similative in Oceanic and non-Oceanic languages: A typological study. Language and Linguistics of Oceania 1: 45–62
Popjes, Jack & Popjes, Jo. 1986. Canela-Krahô. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 128–199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quesada, Juan Diego. 2000. A Grammar of Teribe [Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 36]. Munich: Lincom.
Shay, Erin. 2005. A Grammar of East Dangla: The Simple Sentence. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
. 2001. Comparative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 993–997. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2005. Comparative constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), 490–493. Oxford: OUP. Also in WALS Online: <[URL]>
Ultan, Russell. 1972. Some features of basic comparative constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9: 117–162.
Wang, Peter, Hunt, Robert, McGriff, Jeff & Elkins, Richard E. 2006. The Grammar of Matigsalug Manobo. Dallas TX: SIL.
Cited by (30)
Cited by 30 other publications
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader
2025. Arabic comparatives, gradation, and variation. In The Ziggurat of Grammar [Language Faculty and Beyond, 20], ► pp. 334 ff.
Koshkareva, N. B. & V. N. Solovar
Fan, Ying & Xiuli Guo
2024. On the discourse marker yěshì ‘also’ in Chinese constructions of blame. Functions of Language 31:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
POLIAKOVA, E.E.
Winkler, Maria Emilia
Мария-Эмилия Александровна, Винклер
Cao, Yuzhen & Qiongpeng Luo
2023. The semantics of scalar equatives in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 24:1 ► pp. 120 ff.
De Clercq, Karen, Pavel Caha, Michal Starke & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
Sinitsyna, Julia
Giomi, Riccardo
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2022. On the development of OE swā to ModE so and related changes in an atypical group of demonstratives. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 309 ff.
Bobuafor, Mercy
Hohaus, Vera & Malte Zimmermann
Zhang, Niina Ning
Berghoff, Robyn
Hohaus, Vera & M. Ryan Bochnak
Prescod, Paula
Chamoreau, Claudine
Chirkova, Katia
Guérin, Françoise
Jeannot-Fourcaud, Béatrice
Lü, Shanshan
Pakendorf, Brigitte
Rose, Françoise
König, Ekkehard
2017. The comparative basis of intensification. In Exploring Intensification [Studies in Language Companion Series, 189], ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
