Cover not available

In:Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 105–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
Noun-modifying clauses in Cantonese

Published online: 28 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.06mat
Abstract
Whether relative clauses can be identified in Chinese is a recurrent question. We ask whether relative clauses are distinct from other noun-modifying clause constructions in Cantonese, one of many East Asian languages in which a noun can be preceded by a diverse range of modifying clauses. The relationship between head noun and modifying clause may be a grammatical one, with the head noun being understood as an argument or an adjunct of the modifying clause; or its interpretation may be dependent on semantic and pragmatic factors. We conclude that Cantonese has a General Noun-Modifying Clause Construction as proposed for Japanese (Matsumoto et al., this volume), with relative clauses forming a subset of modifying clauses in which a grammatical relation obtains.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Typological properties of Cantonese
  • 3.Forms and functions of noun-modifying clauses
    • 3.1Noun modification in Mandarin and Cantonese
    • 3.2Typology of NMCCs
      • 3.2.1Argument NMCCs
      • 3.2.2Adjunct NMCCs
    • 3.3Extended NMCCs
      • 3.3.1Frame NMCCs
      • 3.3.2Content noun NMCCs
    • 3.4Pragmatics and ambiguous NMCCs
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (17)
References
Chan, Angel Wing-Shan, Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 2011. The acquisition of relative clauses in Cantonese and Mandarin. In The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Processing, Typology and Function [Trends in Language Acquisition 8], Evan Kidd (ed.), 197–224 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 2006. A Chinese relative. In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 69–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. The areal typology of Chinese: Between North and Southeast Asia. In Chinese Linguistics in Leipzig [Collection des Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 12], Redouane Djamouri, Barbara Meisterernst & Rint Sybesma (eds), 1–21. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. Prenominal relative clauses in verb-object languages. Language and Linguistics 9: 723–733.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, Elaine J., Lam, Charles, Zheng, Carol Chun, Hitz, John & Matthews, Stephen. 2015. Resumptive pronouns, structural complexity, and the elusive distinction between grammar and performance: Evidence from Cantonese. Lingua 162: 52–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Yuan-Jian 2007. Headless relatives in Cantonese: A derivational account. In Studies in Cantonese Linguistics 2, Joanna Ut-Seong Sio & Sze-Wing Tang (eds), 17–32. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal Grammar. Linguistic 1nquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 2007. Integrating frames: Complex noun phrase constructions in Japanese. In Aspects of Linguistics: In Honor of Noriko Akatsuka (Gengogaku No syosoo: Akatsuka Noriko kyoozyu kinen ronbunsyuu), Susumu Kuno, Seiichi Makino & Susan Strauss (eds), 131–154. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen. 2006. Cantonese grammar in areal perspective. In Grammars in Contact, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 220–236. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yeung, Louisa Y.Y. 2001. Processing motivations for topicalization in Cantonese. In Cognitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context, Kaoru Horie & Shigeru Sato (eds), 81–102. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 2001. The structure and stratification of relative clauses in contemporary Cantonese. In Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Hilary Chappell (ed.), 266–281. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ning, Chunyan 1993. The Overt Syntax of Relativization and Topicalization in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing, Fan, Kwok, Lee, Thomas H.T., Lun, Suen, Luke, Kang-Kwong, Tung, Chi-Sun & Cheung, Kwan-Hin. 2002. Guide to LSHK Cantonese Romanization of Chinese Characters., 2nd edn. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen. 2007a. Relative clauses in Cantonese-English bilingual children: Typological challenges and processing motivations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 277–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Pan, Victor Junnan & Yuqiao Du
2024. A multi-dimensional derivation model under the free-MERGE system: labor division between syntax and the C-I interface. The Linguistic Review 41:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Tong & Haiping Long
2024. The relative clause resisting unification. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 69:2 ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
WU, Tong
2022. The general noun-modifying clause construction beyond Eurasia. Linguistic Typology 26:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2021. The on-line construction of meaning in Mandarin Chinese. In Building Categories in Interaction [Studies in Language Companion Series, 220], ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Chan, Angel, Stephen Matthews, Nicole Tse, Annie Lam, Franklin Chang & Evan Kidd
2021. Revisiting Subject–Object Asymmetry in the Production of Cantonese Relative Clauses: Evidence From Elicited Production in 3-Year-Olds. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Huang, Jiaying & Caterina Donati
2019. Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Production of Relative Clauses in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue