In:Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 45–57
Chapter 2The attributive versus final distinction and the manifestation of “main clause phenomena” in Japanese and Korean noun modifying clause constructions
Published online: 28 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.03hor
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.03hor
Abstract
This paper compares Japanese and Korean noun-modifying clause constructions (NMCCs) in terms of the extent to which they accommodate ‘main clause phenomena’. Specifically, Japanese NMCCs allow for address-politeness suffixes to occur, and for quoted speech to be manifested with minimal linking devices. These main clause phenomena are disallowed within Korean NMCCs. We argue that the greater tolerance toward main clause phenomena in Japanese NMCCs than in Korean counterparts is crucially related to a prominent morpho-syntactic difference between the two languages, i.e. the virtual absence (Japanese) versus systematic presence (Korean) of the distinction between attributive and sentence-final forms. The attributive-final distinction in Japanese was obliterated around the sixteenth century.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Noun-modifying clause constructions and attributive predicate forms
- 3.‘Main clause phenomena’ in Japanese and Korean NMCCs
- 4.Further infiltration of main clause phenomena into Japanese NMCCs: Emergence of the ‘less overt’ clause linkage devices marking direct quotation
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Abbreviations References
References (15)
Bisang, Walter. 2007. Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 115–137. Oxford: OUP.
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.
Horie, Kaoru. 2011. Versatility of nominalizations: Where Japanese and Korean contrast. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 473–495. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012. The interactional origin of nominal predicate structure in Japanese: A comparative and historical pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 663–679.
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 2009. Pragmatics of Japanese performative honorifics in subordinate clauses. In Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, Bruce Fraser & Ken Turner (eds), 289–298. Bingley: Emerald.
Maynard, Senko K. 2008. Maruti Zyanru Danwaron (Multi-genre Discourse Studies). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Mikami, Akira. 1953. Gendai Gohoo Zyosetu (Introduction to Modern Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
. 1993. Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo no Rinkaku (An Outline of the Structure of Modern Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Taisyukan.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Horie, Kaoru, Kangwon Lee & Jaehyun Lee
2025. Differential manifestations of the impact of ba on grammar. In Emancipatory Pragmatics [Culture and Language Use, 24], ► pp. 144 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
