In:Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 393–422
Chapter 15. Routes to insubordination
A cross-linguistic perspective
Published online: 18 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.15cri
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.15cri
Cross-linguistic data suggest that we still know relatively little on the possible origins of insubordination, that is, what source constructions give rise to particular types of insubordinate clauses, through what mechanisms, and why. Insubordinate clauses can develop through a wider range of mechanisms than assumed so far, and many clause types are actually compatible with different developmental mechanisms and source constructions. Also, the various mechanisms are quite different in nature, and do not exclusively apply to subordinate clauses. This suggests that insubordination might actually be a result of several different processes pertaining to clause combining in general, rather than a unified process specifically pertaining to subordination.
References (43)
Bybee, Joan. 2008. Formal universals as emergent phenomena: The origins of structure preservation. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 108–121. Oxford: OUP.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1988. On the temporal interpretation of postposed when clauses in narrative discourse. In Papers on Language and Mediaeval Studies Presented to Alfred Schopf,Richard Matthews & Joachim Schmole-Rostosky (eds), 353–372. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
. 1989. Foregrounding and temporal relations in narrative discourse. In Essays on Tensing in English, Vol. II: Time, Text and Modality, 7–29. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 1996. Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because
. Pragmatics 6: 389–426.
. 2008. Asymmetric events, subordination, and grammatical categories. In Asymmetric Events [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 11], Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 151–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. Is there really a syntactic category of subordination? In Contexts of Subordination. Cognitive, Typological and Discourse Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249], Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski & Helena Sorva (eds), 73-91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deane, Paul. 1991. Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics 2, 1–63.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: CUP.
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14-38. Oxford: OUP.
Hargus, Sharon. n.d. Subordination and insubordination in Deg Xinag’. Ms. <[URL]>
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 576–601. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heine, Bernd & Claudi, Ulrike. 1986. On the Rise of Grammatical Categories: Some Examples from Maa. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2000. Suppressed assertion and the functions of the final-attributive in prose and poetry of Hejan Japanese. In Textual Parameters in Older Languages, Susan Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 237–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kalinina, Elena. 2011. Exclamative clauses in the languages of the North Caucasus and the problem of finiteness. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 161–202. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2001. Exclamative constructions. In Language Universals and Language Typology: An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Österreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1038–1050. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2009. Re(e)volving complexity: Adding intonation. In Syntactic Complexity [Typological Studies in Language 85], Tom Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 53–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mori, Junko. 1999. Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: Connective Expressions and Turn Constructions [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1997. Versatile nominalizations. In Essays in Language Function and Language Type, Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. Aspects of the historical development of nominalizers in the Tamangic languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Patz, Elisabeth. 2002. A Grammar of the Kuku Yalanji Language of North Queensland. [Pacific Linguistics 527]. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Reintges, Chris H. 2010. Coordination, converbs, and clause-chaining in Coptic Egyptian typology. In Clause Hierarchy and Clause Linking: Syntax and Pragmatics [Studies in Language Companion Series 121], Isabelle Bril (ed.), 203–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robert, Stéphane. 2010. Clause chaining and conjugations in Wolof: A typology of parataxis and its semantics. In Clause Hierarchy and Clause Linking: Syntax and Pragmatics [Studies in Language Companion Series 121], Isabelle Bril (ed.), 469–498. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Scheutz, H. 2001. On causal clause combining: the case of weil in spoken German. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 111–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–164.
Tucker, Archibald Norman & Mpaayey, John Tompo Ole. 1955. A Maasai Grammar with Vocabulary. London: Longmans.
Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin Reference Grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
van der Auwera, Johan. 1985. The predicative relatives of French perception verbs. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar, A. Machteld Bolkestein, Casper de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 219–234. Dordrecht: Foris.
Yap, Foong Ha & Matthews, Stephen. 2008. The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], Marie José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 309–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen &. Wrona, Janick 2011. Introduction. Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 1–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Doehler, Simona Pekarek & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2025. An interactional grammar of insubordination. In Grammar in Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 37], ► pp. 332 ff.
Dér, Csilla Ilona
Daniels, Don
Garcia Castillero, Carlos
Ganfi, Vittorio
la Roi, Ezra
Cristofaro, Sonia
2019. Nominalization in cross-linguistic diachronic perspective. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 169 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020. The insubordinate – subordinate continuum. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 87 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2017. There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage. English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
