In:Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 171–182
Chapter 7. Insubordination in the Tsezic Languages
Published online: 18 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.07com
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.07com
The Tsezic languages present a number of prima facie instances of insubordination, given current definitions of this phenomenon. For the purposes of this chapter, we base ourselves on the definition provided by Evans (2007: 367): “[Insubordination is] the conventionalized main clause use of what, on prima facie grounds, appear to be formally subordinate clauses.” While some instances of insubordination in Tsezic languages seem to illustrate typical instances, others present synchronic and diachronic issues that probe the phenomenon’s boundaries.
References (22)
Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria. 2007. Evidentials in Tsez. In L’énonciation médiatisée II: Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: Illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes, Zlatka Guentchéva & Jon Landaburu (eds), 335–350. Louvain: Peeters.
Creissels, Denis. 2009. Participles and finiteness: The case of Akhvakh. Linguistic Discovery 7(1): 106–130.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.
. 2011. Evidentiality and new media in the Caucasus – the case of Hinuq. In Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Lutz Marten & David Nathan (eds), 101–110. London: University of London.
. 2013b. Hinuq verb forms and finiteness. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 66(1): 69–93.
. 2014. The grammar of knowledge in Hinuq. In The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 52–68. Oxford: OUP.
Gagliardi, Annie, Goncalves, Michael, Polinsky, Maria & Radkevich, Nina. 2014. The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez. Lingua 150: 137–170.
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74]. Cambridge: CUP.
Imnajšvili, David S. 1963. Didojskij jazyk v sravnenii s ginuxskim i xvaršijskim jazykami (The Dido [Tsez] language in comparison with the Hinuq and Khwarshi languages). Tbilisi: Izdatel´stvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSR.
Kalinina, Elena & Sumbatova, Nina. 2007. Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 184–249. Oxford: OUP.
Kazenin, Konstantin. 1998. On patient demotion in Lak. In Typology of Verbal Categories: Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday [Linguistische Arbeiten 382], Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 95–115. Tübingen: Niemeyer
Kazenin, Konstantin I. 2001. Umen´šenie perexodnosti: binominativnaja konstrukcija. In Bagvalinskij jazyk, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 394–399. Moscow: Nasledie.
Kazenin, Konstantin I. & Testelec, Jakov G. 1999. Struktura sostavljajuščix. In Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 314–346. Moscow: Nasledie.
Khalilova, Zaira. 2009. A Grammar of Khwarshi [Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap 234].Utrecht: LOT.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Daniels, Don
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
