Cover not available

In:Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 145–170

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6. Insubordinated conditionals in spoken and non-spoken Italian

 | Università Roma Tre
Published online: 18 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.06val
In this chapter, Italian free conditionals are located within the general framework of Insubordination (Evans 2007). By means of the data contained in spoken and non-spoken Italian corpora, a series of questions related to the issue are addressed. The question regarding the extent to which the use of such constructions can be considered conventionalized is answered by considering the frequency of the construction as compared to the general frequency of if-clauses; its different diffusion in spoken and written uses and, among them, dialogic vs. non-dialogic situations; intonation patterns, conveying a series of pragmatic functions and characterizing if-clauses without an (overt) main clause as specific speech acts; conventionalization of meaning and function.The hypothesis that in language there may be a permanent tendency to creating insubordinated conditionals is explored in relation to such pressures as phonetical economy, communicative economy/ergonomy exploiting vagueness, the politeness function of “being incomplete”, and the possible preference for the iconic order “cause-consequence”.
References (27)
References
Almela Pérez, Ramón. 1985. El si introductor de oraciones independientes en español. Lingüistica Española Actual 7: 5–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buscha, Anna. 1976. Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
C–Oral-Rom = Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo (eds). 2005. C–Oral-Rom. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, V. 2003. Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’italiano parlato. Analisi sperimentale di un corpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA). Tesi di Dottorato, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LIP = de Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico,Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam . 1993. Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: ETAS libri. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2003. “Pragmaticizzazione” dell’incompletezza sintattica nell’italiano parlato: le ipotetiche sospese. In Il parlato italiano, Federico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: Atti del Convegno Nazionale, D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Come era il parlato di lingue antiche: Le ipotetiche libere. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 2: 225–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Ipotetiche libere e grammaticalizzazione in corso nel parlato. In Lingua e dialetto nell’Italia del Duemila, Alberto Sobrero & Annarita Miglietta (eds), 49–75. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Ipotetiche libere nel non parlato. Sintassi storica e sincronica dell'italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione (Atti del X Congresso Internazionale SILFI, Basilea, giugno-luglio 2008), Angela Ferrari (ed.), 1333–1355. Firenze: Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Free conditionals in discourse: The forming of a construction. Linguisticae Investigationes 33(1): 50–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luzi, Eleonora. 2008. Ipotetiche libere: Il ruolo dell’intonazione nell’interpretazione pragmatica. Doctoral work in progress, Università Roma Tre, Dottorato in Linguistica diacronica, sincronica e applicata - XXIII ciclo - Relatore prof. E Lombardi Vallauri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montolío Durán, Estrella. 1999. ¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre construcciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo. Oralia 2: 37–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1996. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2002. From silence to grammar: Grammaticalization and ellipsis in Korean. Paper presented at the conference: “New Reflexions on Grammaticalization II” , Amsterdam, 3–6 April.
Rudolph, Elisabeth. 1981. Zur Problematik der Konnektive des kausalen Bereichs. In Konnektivausdrücke, Konnektiveinheiten, Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten 1 [ Papers in Textlinguistics 30], Johannes Fritsche (ed.), 146–244. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. 1996. The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316–351.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si . Annuari de Filologia 21: 87–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Viewpoints and polysemy: Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 257–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Expectations and (in)sufficiency: Spanish como-conditionals. Linguistics 39(4): 733–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Discourse markers and the PA/SN distinction. Journal of Linguistics 38: 43–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 2006. Constructions: Types, niveaux, force pragmatique. À la quête du sens: Études littéraires, historiques et linguistiques en hommage à Christiane Marchello-Nizia, Céline Guillot, Serge Heiden & Sophie Prévost (eds), 137–159. Lyon: ENS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 1998. Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text 5(1-2): 55–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
audio

Example 14

Example 15

Example 16

Example 17

Example 18

Example 19

Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Doehler, Simona Pekarek & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2025. An interactional grammar of insubordination. In Grammar in Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 37], ► pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Gras, Pedro
2025. Insubordination at the Interaction of Discourse, Grammar, and Prosody. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Montébran, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux, G. Merminod & G. Philippe
2024. Les si-indépendantes dans l’interaction : un continuum d’insubordination. SHS Web of Conferences 191 ► pp. 01016 ff. DOI logo
Ganfi, Vittorio
2023. Mi è modali?Costruzioni insubordinate con mi in siciliano nordorientale . Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2021. Conditional clauses as polite modifiers in Latin:si placetbetween pragmaticalization and language contact. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In search of basic units of spoken language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
2017. Examining the Concept of Subordination in Spoken L1 and L2 English: The Case ofIf‐Clauses. TESOL Quarterly 51:4 ► pp. 897 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 4], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue