Cover not available

In:Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 205–242

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The role of nominalization in theticity

A Sikuani contribution

 | CNRS (SeDyL | CELIA)
Published online: 23 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.09que
When speakers need to communicate a piece of information in which they allocate all the components the same degree of informational density – especially the components expressing the state of the world described and the entities associated with it – they rely on linguistic mechanisms that may differ radically from those employed in speech-acts that involve a rhematic element (rather dense informationally) linked to a thematic element (rather thin informationally). In languages where existential predication does not require a verb of existence with the subject as the thematic element, this type of construction is well adapted to the thetic communicative intention, since it is organized around a noun phrase conveying rhematic information that is not connected to any thematic element apart from the world, or the situation. Since this element is not instantiated linguistically, or at least not by expressions capable of referring, the structure of this kind of existential predication is monadic. This is the most striking difference between the formal correlates of thetic constructions and those of the dyadic construction with rheme and theme. The Sikuani language makes a great deal of use of verb nominalization machinery (which provides a way to combine in the most parsimonious way the state of affairs described and the entities associated with it) in order to fulfill the goal of thetic communication. In particular, by playing with these mechanisms this language manages to modulate the degree of semantic reification of the state of the world described by the nominalized verb. Consequently a nominalized form with a thetic function becomes able to express semantic configurations (events, states, etc.) similar to those normally expressed by finite verbs.
References (42)
References
Baker, Mark. 1995. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne. 2011. Theticity in Trio (Cariban). International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 1-31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casielles, Eugenia & Progovac, Ljiljana. 2009. Protosyntax: A thetic (unaccusative) stage. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 9: 29-48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chacon, Thiago. 2012. The Phonology and Morphology of Kubeo: The Documentation, Theory and Description of an Amazonian Language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Chafe, Wallace. 1974. Language and consciousness. Language 50: 111-33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27-55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell Tomlin (ed.), 21-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4): 808-845. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, John. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Information Structure. The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 1987. The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis. Language 63(4): 856-70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Introduction. In Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 35], T. Givón (ed.), 1-84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Finiteness and nominalization. Workshop on Finitude et nominalisation, PICS CNRS Complexité syntaxique et diversité typologique. Paris, October 12-14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39-76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2011. Exclamatives and temporal nominalizations in Austronesian. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 721-754. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1987. Aboutness as a cognitive category: The thetic-categorical distinction revisited. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 366-381.
. 1988. There was a farmer had a dog: Syntactic amalgams revisited. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 319-339.
. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Launey, Michel. 1994. Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la morphosyntaxe du nahuatl classique. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Sean Michael. 2001. Rethinking the existence of the thetic judgment. <[URL]>
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. The role of motivation in the emergence of grammatical categories: The grammaticalization of subjects. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Traugott & Bernard Heine (eds), 160-184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potsdam, Eric. 2011. Expressing exclamatives in Malagasy. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 659-684. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 2008. What use is half a clause? In Evolution of Language: Proceedings of EVOLANG 7, Andrew D.M. Smith, Kenny Smith & Ramon Ferrer i Cancho (eds), 259-266. Singapore: World Scientific.
Queixalós, Francesc. 1998. Nom, verbe et prédicat en sikuani. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Syntaxe sikuani. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Relations grammaticales et hiérarchie des objets en sikuani. In Faits de Langues: Méso-Amérique, Caraïbes, Amazonie 2, Jon Landaburu & Francesc Queixalós (eds). 77-92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Posse em Katukína e valência dos nomes. In Novos estudos sobre línguas indígenas brasileiras, Ayron Rodrigues & Ana Cabral (eds), 177-202. Brasilia: University of Brasília.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. Notes sur la nominalization. In La structure des langues amazoniennes II, Amerindia 35, Ana Carla Bruno, Frantomé Pacheco, Francesc Queixalós, Stella Telles & Leo Wetzels (eds), 105-110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Queixalós, F. 2012b. Nominalization in Sikuani. In La structure des langues amazoniennes II, Amerindia 35, Ana Carla Bruno, Frantomé Pacheco, Francesc Queixalós, Stella Telles & Leo Wetzels (eds), 153-86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc & Jimenez Rosalba. 1994. Wajaliwaisianü. Sikuani Piatiriwi Pexi Tsipaeba. Bogota: Etnollano.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosengren Inger. 1997. The thetic / categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics 35(3): 439-479.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic / categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511-580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, Anne. 2010. Discourse principles in grammar: The thetic/categorical dichotomy. In Proceedings of the Tropics of the Imagination Conference , 2 November 2009, Cairns, James Cook University. <[URL]>
Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática do Kamaiurá. São Paulo: Editora de Unicamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi 1991. Grammaticization of topic into subject. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Traugott & Bernard Heine (eds), 93-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steele, Susan. 1989. Subject values. Language 65(3): 537-578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wehr, Barbara. 2000. Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des français parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomassen (eds), 239-289. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Belligh, Thomas
2020. Are theticity and sentence-focus encoded grammatical categories of Dutch?. In Thetics and Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 262], ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Estevam, Adriana M.
2019. Nominalization and its pervasiveness in Xavante. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 591 ff. DOI logo
Magalhães, Marina, Walkíria Praça & Aline Da Cruz
2019. Gradação da omnipredicatividade na família Tupi-Guarani. Forma y Función 32:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue