Cover not available

In:Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 43–68

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Exploring finiteness and non-finiteness in Pima Bajo (Uto-Aztecan)

 | Universidad de Sonora
Published online: 23 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.03est
This paper aims to provide a proper characterization of finite and non-finite clauses in Pima Bajo, a Uto-Aztecan language from the Tepiman branch. Our main research questions are, firstly, how to address the topic of finiteness in a language without morphological tense marking? And secondly, what are the relevant features or properties that distinguish finite and non-finite constructions in a language with no obligatory agreement markers? Finiteness and non-finiteness have long been discussed and analyzed in either formal or functional terms, mostly from a Eurocentric perspective. The most traditional notion takes finiteness to be associated with tense-aspect and agreement only, whereas functional approaches, consider finiteness to be a scalar, or gradient, phenomenon not reducible to tense-aspect marking and agreement. This paper analyzes finite and non-finite constructions in Pima Bajo, taking into consideration different morphosyntactic features, among them those that express illocutionary force and those that anchor the event. These features include aspect suffixes, personal pronouns, modals, and scope particles, among others. The analysis of finite and non-finite constructions in Pima Bajo shows that finiteness is a construction and language-particular phenomenon that cannot be reduced to morphological properties of the verb such as person and number agreement or tense marking.
References (28)
References
Bisang, Walter. 2001. Finite vs. non-finite languages. In Language Typology and Linguistic Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1400-1413. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 115-137. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth. 2002. Finiteness. <[URL]> (12 July 2012).
Cowper, Elizabeth & Hall, Daniel Currie. 1999. Semantic composition and syntactic structure: English inflection. Paper presented to the Canadian Linguistic Association . University of Sherbrooke.
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. 1998. Pima bajo de Yepachi, Chihuahua. Archivo de Lenguas Indígenas de México. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. From demonstrative to a relative marker to clause linker: The relative clause formation in Pima Bajo. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas: A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], B. Comrie & Z. Estrada-Fernández (eds), 127-146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Gramática de referencia de pima bajo, Vol. I. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Gramática de referencia de pima bajo, Vol. II. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. 1977. Breve vocabulario del idioma pima de Ónavas (Desde materiales proporcionados por las siguientes personas: Agustín Estrella, Pedro Estrella, María Fierro y María Córdova). Ms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Walpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5-47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1988. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordens, Peter & Dimroth, Christine. 2006. Finiteness in children and adults learning Dutch. In The Acquisition of Verbs and Their Grammar: The Effect of Particular Languages, N. Gagarina & I. Gülzow (eds), 173-198. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keifer, Ferenc. 1994. Modality. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.), 2515-2520. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition: Essays in Honor of Jürgen Weissenborn, Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds), 225-245. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Launey, Michel. 1994. Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la morphosyntaxe du nahuatl classique. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maas, Utz. 2004. Finite and non-finite from a typological perspective. Linguistics 42(2): 359-385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.). 2007. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12): 1176-1189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 2007. In what ways can finite and nonfinite clauses differ? Evidence from Russian. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 250-305. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & van Lier, Eva. 2013. Flexible Word Classes: Typological Studies of Underspecified Parts of Speech. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschoko, Martina. 2005. Anchoring events to utterances without tense. In Proceedings of the 24th Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , John Alderete, Chung-hye Han & Alexei Kocheto (eds), 343-351. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Artawa, Ketut. 2015. Balinese valency classes. In Valency Classes: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 877-940. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Buckingham. 1862. Arte de la lengua névome que se dice pima, propia de Sonora, con la doctrina christiana y confesionario añadidos [Shea’s Library of American Linguistics 5]. New York NY: Cramoisy Press. (Republished by AMS Press, New York NY, 1970).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steele, Susan, Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard, Jelinek, Eloise, Kitagawa, Chiasato, Oehrle, Richard, & Wasow, Thomas. 1981. An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence. Boston MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
2025. What is finiteness in Dagaare?. Journal of World Languages 11:1 ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina
2019. Syntactic nominalizations in Pima Bajo. In Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity [Typological Studies in Language, 126], ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue