Cover not available

In:Valence Changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology
Edited by Natalie Operstein and Aaron Huey Sonnenschein
[Typological Studies in Language 110] 2015
► pp. 1–6

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 1. Foreword

Rethinking perspectives in typology

 | Ghent University
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.110.01kul
References (21)
References
Arka, I Wayan & Ross, Malcolm (eds). 2005. The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2007. Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 239–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1988. The diachronic dimension in explanation. In Explaining Language Universals, John Hawkins (ed.), 350-379. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds). 2000. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geisler, Hans & Daniel, Jacob (eds). 1998. Transitivität und Diathese in romanischen Sprachen [Linguistische Arbeiten 392]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1969. Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In Substance and Structure of Language, Jaan Puhvel (ed.), 147–203. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Rethinking linguistics diachronically. Language 55(2): 275-290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guxman, Mirra Moiseevna. 1964. Razvitie zalogovyx protivopostavlenij v germanskix jazykax: Opyt istoriko-tipologičeskogo issledovanija rodstvennyx jazykov (The development of voice oppositions in Germanic languages: an historic and typological study of genetically related languages). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1966. Are there universals of linguistic change? In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 30–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2002. Transitivity: Towards a Comprehensive Typology. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Tryckeri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds), 171-202. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2010. Bridging typology and diachrony: a preliminary questionnaire for a diachronic typological study of voice and valency-changing categories. In Problemy grammatiki i tipologii: sbornik statej pamjati Vladimira Petroviča Nedjalkova (1928–2009) (Issues in grammar and typology: a memorial volume for Vladimir Nedjalkov),Valentin F. Vydrin, Sergej Ju. Dmitrenko, Natal’ja M. Zaika, Sergej S. Saj, Nina R. Sumbatova & Viktor S. Xrakovskij (eds), 139-163. Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1998. Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (with the assistance of Emma Š. Geniušienė & Zlatka Guentchéva) (eds). 2007. Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2): 149-211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norman, Boris Justinovič. 1972. Perexodnost’, zalog, vozvratnost’ (na materiale bolgarskogo i drugix slavjanskix jazykov) (Transitivity, voice, reflexivity (evidence from Bulgarian and other Slavic languages)). Minsk: Izdatel’stvo BGU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Operstein, Natalie. 2014. Origin of the Zapotec causative marker *k-: a diachronic-typological perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 80: 99–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 1987. Linguistic Typology. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius. 2014. Cognitive processing, language typology, and variation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5: 477-487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wouk, Fay & Ross, Malcolm (eds). 2002. The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems. Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue