Cover not available

In:The Linguistics of Temperature
Edited by Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Typological Studies in Language 107] 2015
► pp. 889–916

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The syntax of temperature predications

 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Published online: 11 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.107.30pus
The syntactic structures encountered in clauses containing temperature concepts tend to differ from the ones employed in standard intransitive clause types. These constructions are remarkable not only because of their unusual internal makeup, but also because of the great variety in syntactic patterns they exhibit. However, despite the considerable variety in the structure of temperature clauses, identical or near-identical temperature constructions recur in languages around the world with amazing regularity. The present study seeks to explore the reasons for the variety in the structure of temperature predications, as well as the reasons for the frequent recurrence of similar or identical construction types at the cross-linguistic level. The conclusion drawn from the available data is that both phenomena are due to cognitive principles, which allow varying construals of temperature events, but which, because of the universality of these principles, also limit the conceptualization of temperature events to a specific set of possible construals.
References (35)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra, Dixon, Robert M.W. & Onishi, Masayuki (eds). 2001. Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald E. & Kumari, T.C. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassène, Alain-Christian & Creissels, Denis. 2011. Impersonal constructions in Jóola-Banjal. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), 285-306.
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Kamuri Venkata. (eds). 2004. Non-nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60-61], 2 Vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, B. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 1, 77–112.
Einarsson, Stefan. 1945. Icelandic: Grammar, Texts, Glossary. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksen, Pål, Kittilä, Seppo & Kolehmainen, Leena. 2010. The linguistics of weather. Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions. Studies in Language 34: 565-601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo. 2011a. Expressions for physical and mental states in the Circum-Mediterranean languages: Contact-induced and/or autonomous parallelisms? Workshop on Gradualness in Change and its Relation to Synchronic Variation and Use, University of Pavia.
. 2011b. Experiental constructions in the Circum- Mediterranean area. In Structures and Meanings: Cross-theoretical Perspectives, Maria Frascarelli (ed.), 21-37. Torino: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermon, Gabriella. 2001. Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 149-176.
Hopper, Paula & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251-99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobson, Steven A. 1995. A Practical Grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo Language. Fairbanks AK: University of Alaska.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, K.A. 2004. The possessor-experiencer dative in Malayalam. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 1, 227-244.
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 249-301. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2011. “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik, Sarah Dessí Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 379-96. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju & Gwynn, John Peter Lucius. 1985. A Grammar of Modern Telugu. Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.1. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macdonald, Roderick Ross & Darjowidjojo, Soenjono. 1967. A Students’ Reference Grammar of Modern Formal Indonesian. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Ogawa, Akio. 2011. Towards a typology of impersonal constructions. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), 19-56.
Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna (eds). 2011. Impersonal Constructions. A Cross- Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazur, Boleslaw W. 20012. Colloquial Polish. The Complete Course for Beginners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina & Tosco, Mauro. 2011. Impersonal configurations and theticity: The case of meteorological predications in Afroasiatic. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), 307-322.
Montaut, Annie. 2004a. A Grammar of Hindi. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 2, 33-56.
Onishi, Masayoshi. 2004. Instrumental subjects in Motuna. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 2, 83-101.
Ross, Malcolm D. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In The Comparative Method Reviewed. Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, Mark D. Durie & Malcolm D. Ross (eds), 180-217. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sands, Kristina & Campbell, Lyle. 2001. Non-canonical subjects and objects in Finnish. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 307-354.
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fé T. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Christian Brothers 1965. New Irish Grammar. Dublin: Fallons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., í Lon Jacobsen, Jógvan & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2004. Faroese: An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & La Polla, Randy. 1997. Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J. (with the assistance of Parker McKenzie). 1984. A Grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wendt, Heinz F. 19996. Langenscheidt’s Taschenwörterbuch Türkisch. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2022. Semantic maps and temperature: Capturing the lexicon-grammar interface across languages. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2022. Talking temperature with close relatives. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Andrason, Alexander
2019. Weather in Polish: A Contribution to the Typology of Meteorological Constructions. Studia Linguistica 73:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue