Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 69–98

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The grammaticalization chain of case functions

Extension and reanalysis of case marking vs. universals of grammaticalization

 | Tohoku University
Published online: 19 August 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.106.03nar
In the 1980s and 1990s, grammaticalization research brought forth a number of intriguing proposals concerning the directionality of extension and change between case functions, i.e. semantic roles. One of these proposals, by Heine et al. (1991), consisted in a single unidirectional chain of increasing grammaticalization of case functions, advancing from the spatial domain via an anthropocentric domain to inanimate and abstract domains, based on metaphorical extension. This bold proposal is still often referred to, but has proven to be problematic in some points, especially in the intermediate area of anthropocentric concepts. The present paper investigates this chain in detail, showing which hypothesized extensions still hold and which not. It is argued that the single chain is untenable and has to be broken up into at least two larger directionalities, one leading to the development of the expression of core participants, often triggered by constructional reanalysis, and the other leading to highly abstract, inanimate case roles. The application of the concept of metaphorical extension to the reanalysis cases is much less straightforward than that to the semantically motivated cases. However, the result of change is similar, as the semantic weight of the linguistic expression shifts practically completely to the nominal, and case marking becomes almost purely syntactic marking. Dative case functions are in an intermediate position leading to extensions both in the direction of core participants and to inanimate, abstract roles. Keywords: Grammaticalization; semantic roles; semantic maps; unidirectionality; case functions; metaphor
References (69)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Semantic Change, Charles N. Li, (ed.), 317–63. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1986. Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’. Linguistics 24: 503–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bostoen, Koen & Nzang-Bie, Yolande. 2010. On how “middle” plus “associative/reciprocal” became “passive” in the Bantu A70 languages. Linguistics 48(6): 1255–1307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brachet, Auguste. 1882. An Etymological Dictionary of the French Language. Translated by George William Kitchin, 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2006. The dative-ergative connection. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 69–92. <[URL]>
Creissels, Denis. 2008. Direct and indirect explanations of typological regularities: The case of alignment variations. Folia Linguistica 42(1): 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Spatial cases. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–25. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2008. Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phyologeny. Lingua 118: 141–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1986. Explanation in natural morphology: Illustrated with comparative and agent-noun formation. Linguistics 24: 519–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endruschat, Annette. 2007. Durch ‘mit’ eingeleitete präpositionale Objekte in den romanischen Sprachen. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estival, Dominique & John Myhill. 1977. Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In: Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed) Passive and Voice, 441–491. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The origin of split ergativity. Language 66(2): 261–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1998. On Reconstructing Grammar. Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & de Castro Alves, Flavia. 2010. Nominative-absolutive: Counter-universal split ergativity in Je and Cariban. In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalos (eds), 159–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 2013. Reflexive causative > passive in English and Cariban. Handout of presentation at the 21st Symposium About Language and Society-Austin (SALSA), 12 April 2013.
Grünthal, Riho. 2003. Finnic Adpositions and Cases in Change. Helsinki: Societé Finno-ougrienne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, Petra. 2012. Split-ergativity in Hittite. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 102(2): 270–303.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. From Space to Time. Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–243. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Grammaticalization of cases. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko. 2010. Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 401–423. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, Hakyung. 2009. Possessive subjects, nominalization, and ergativity in North Russia. In Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages. Papers Presented at the Workshop on Indo-European Linguistics at the XVIIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 2007. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305], Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds), 207–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–61. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 22002. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 2nd, revised edn. [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt 9]. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität. Earlier editions 1982, 1995.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luján, Eugenio R. 2010. Semantic maps and word formation: agents, instruments, and related semantic roles. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 162–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2001a. Syncretism and the classification of semantic roles. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(1): 35–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. Some remarks on instrument, comitative, and agent in Indo-European. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(4): 385–401.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Paths of semantic extension. From cause to beneficiary and purpose. In Historical Linguistics 2003. Selected Papers from the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Copenhagen, 11–15 August 2003. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 257], Michael Fortescue, Eva Skafte Jensen, Jens Erik Mogensen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 141–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Where do beneficiaries come from and how do they come about? Sources for beneficiary expressions in Classical Greek and the typology of beneficiary. In Historical Cognitive Linguistics, Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allen (eds), 93–131. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Pompei, Anna & Skopeteas, Stavros. 2005. Ancient Greek. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Narrog, Heiko. 2008. Case polysemy. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 518–535. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura & Rosalie, Marcel. 2000. Polysémie et cartes sémantiques: La relateur (av)ek en créole Seychellois. Études Créoles 23(2): 79–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2009. Varieties of Instrumental. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 593–600. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 233–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Ito, Shinya. 2007. Reconstructing semantic maps. The comitative-instrumental area. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4): 273–292.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael & Mihas, Elena. 2007. Areal dimensions in case syncretism: Ablatives and genitives. Paper presented at ALT VII, Paris, 25–28 September 2007.
OED = Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edn. 2002. CD-Rom.
Palancar, Enrique L. 2002. The Origin of Agent Markers [Studia Typologica 5]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poudel, Tikaram. 2008. Nepali ergativity: A historical perspective. Handout at the Workshop on Case and Alignment in Indo-European . University of Bergen, 10–11 December 2008.
Sawicki, Lea. 1991. Genitive and instrumental in passive constructions in Lithuanian. Indogermanische Forschungen 96: 168–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. Zweiter Band. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant. 2001. The causative continuum. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 3: 136–177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shirane, Haruo. 2005. Classical Japanese. A Grammar. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1988. The passive in Slavic. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 85], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 243–289. Benjamins: John Amsterdam. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Passive-to-ergative versus inverse-to-ergative. In Case, Typology and Grammar. In Honor of Barry J. Blake [Typological Studies in Language 38], Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds), 229–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2001a. Comitatives vs. instrumentals vs. agents. In Aspects of Typology and Universals, Walter Bisang (ed.), 153–74. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. To be with X is to have X: Comitatives, instrumentals, locative and predicative possession. Linguistics 39(2): 321–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina. 2006. On Comitatives and Related Categories. A Typological Study with Special Focus on the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroh, Cornelia. 1998. Die Geschichte der Mit-Relationen im Französischen: Komitativ-Instrumental-Synkretismus mit Hindernissen. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51(2): 131–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. MIT-Relationen in der Romania: Ein klarer Fall? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52(2): 183–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toyota, Junichi. 2008. Diachronic Change in the English Passive. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed), 385–404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje & De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2009. The rise of ergativity in Hindi. Assessing the role of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 30: 367–390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2011. The grammaticalization of passives. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 535–546. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Kazuyuki. 2004. A Typological, Historical, and Functional Study of Adpositions in the Languages of the World. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico.
Yan, Yaoliang. 2003. The Grammaticalization of Yu from a Verb to a Function Word. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Cited by (36)

Cited by 36 other publications

Paul, Ludwig
2024. West Iranian in historical perspective. Journal of Historical Linguistics DOI logo
Rasekh-Mahand, Mohammad & Mehdi Parizadeh
2024. Different functions of ‘rā’ in New Persian. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal
2023. From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language 47:4 ► pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Shuya
2023. The history of the polyfunctional 𗗙jij1 in Tangut. Studies in Language 47:3 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2022. Similatives are Manners, comparatives are Quantities (except when they aren’t). Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
Chappell, Hilary & Jean‐Christophe Verstraete
2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:3 DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2018. Areal diffusion and the limits of grammaticalization. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
2018. Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
2018. Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Coupe, Alexander R.
2018. Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Östen
2018. Grammaticalization in the languages of Europe. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Esseesy, Mohssen
2018. Typological features of grammaticalization in Semitic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Gildea, Spike & Joana Jansen
2018. The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian. In Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Haig, Geoffrey
2018. Grammaticalization and inflectionalization in Iranian. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2018. Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Grammaticalization in Africa. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
2018. Grammaticalization in Turkic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Klamer, Marian
2018. Typology and grammaticalization in the Papuan languages of Timor, Alor, and Pantar. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
McWhorter, John H.
2018. Is grammaticalization in creoles different?. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2018. Shaping typology through grammaticalization: North America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Mohammadirad, Masoud & Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
2018. Functions of the dative: An Iranian perspective. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 71:4 ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2018. Grammaticalization in Oceanic languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana
2018. Grammaticalization and typology in Australian Aboriginal languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Introduction. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
2018. Grammaticalization in Japanese and Korean. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Hiram L.
2018. Addressing questions of grammaticalization in creoles. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Zariquiey, Roberto
2018. Diachronic stories of body-part nouns in some language families of South America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018. The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9 DOI logo
Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis
2017. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, DOI logo
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2 ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. List of abbreviations. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Series preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Copyright Page. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue