Cover not available

In:Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 45–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Subordinate clauses and exclusive focus in Makhuwa

 | University of Cambridge
Published online: 5 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.02van
In Makhuwa the element immediately after the conjoint verb form is interpreted as exclusive focus (Van der Wal 2011). This paper shows that the relation between the conjoint verb form and focus in Immediate After Verb (IAV) position holds not only for nouns and simple adverbs, but also for adverbial subordinate clauses with a relative or Situative verb, which are clearly focused when they follow a conjoint verb form. I propose that the reason that sentential complements do not receive a focus interpretation in the same position is due to the absence of internal information structure in the adverbial clauses. Hence, adverbial clauses but not complement clauses function as a single integrated informational unit in the information structure of the main clause. Keywords: Makhuwa; exclusive focus; subordinate clause; information structure
References (44)
References
Bennett, Patrick R., Biersteker, Ann J., Gikonyo, Waithira L., Herschberg, Susan, Kamande, Joel, Harford, Carolyn & Swearingen, Martha. 1985. Gĩkũyũ nĩ kĩoigire: A First Course in Kikuyu. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1993. Belhare subordination and the theory of topic. In Studies in Clause Linkage, Karin Ebert (ed.), 23-55. Zürich: ASAS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buell, Leston. 2006. The Zulu conjoint/disjoint verb alternation: Focus or constituency? ZAS WPiL 43: 9-30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Evaluating the immediate postverbal position as a focus position in Zulu. In Selected Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: Linguistic Theory and African Language Documentation , Masangu Matondo, Fiona Mc Laughlin & Eric Potsdam (eds), 166-172. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Centis, Gino. 2000. Metodo Macua. Anchilo: Centro Catequetico Paulo VI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 437-449.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Downing, Laura J. 2011. Against FocusP: Arguments from Zulu. In Information Structure. Contrasts and Positions, Ivona Kučerová & Ad Neeleman (eds), 247-266. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2001. The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses a typological study. Language 77: 345-365 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doke, Clement M. 1945. Text-book of Zulu Grammar. London: Longmans, Green & Co., Pietermaritzburg printed (4th edn, on behalf of the University of the Witwatersrand).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1975. Focus and the scope of assertion: Some Bantu evidence. Studies in African Linguistics 6(2): 185-205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Syntax, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 1996. Verbalmorphologie und Nebenprädikationen im Bantu: Eine Studie zur funktional motivierten Genese eines konjugationalen Subsystems. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. The relation between imperfective and simultaneous taxis in Bantu. Late stages of grammaticalization. In Afrikanische Sprachen im Brennpunkt der Forschung, Ines Fiedler, Catherine Griefenow-Mewis & Brigitte Reineke (eds), 157-177. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Asyndetic subordination and deverbal depictive expressions in Shona. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives. Nikolaus Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 323-353. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guthrie, Malcolm. 1948. The Classification of the Bantu Languages. London: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564-589.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 1-55.
Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard (eds). 1995. Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – Adverbial Participles, Gerunds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465-491.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Polinsky, Maria. 2009. Focus in Aghem. In Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 206-233. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1995. The meaning of converb constructions. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 57-96.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linage. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds), 181-225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1995. Some typological parameters of converbs. In Haspelmath & König (eds), 97-136.
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2007. Finiteness. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 52-150. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stucky, Susan. 1979. The interaction of tone and focus in Makua. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 1(2): 189-198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text 5: 55-84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja J. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 237-300. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Spuy, Andrew. 1993. Dislocated noun phrases in Nguni. Lingua 90: 335-355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2006. Predicative tone lowering in Makhuwa. Linguistics in the Netherlands 23: 224-236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Word Order and Information Structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The Makhuwa non-subject relative as a participial modifier. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 31(2): 205-231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Focus excluding alternatives: Conjoint/disjoint marking in Makhuwa. Lingua 121(11): 1734-1750. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Wal, Jenneke & Veenstra, Tonjes. Submitted. The long and short of verb alternations in Mauritian Creole and Bantu languages.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watters, John. 1979. Focus in Aghem. In Aghem Grammatical Structure, Larry M. Hyman (ed.), 157-189. Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoneda, Nobuko. 2011. Word order in Matengo: Topicality and informational roles. Lingua 121(5): 754-771. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Lutz Marten, Ellen Hurst-Harosh, Nancy C. Kula & Jochen Zeller
2025. The Oxford Guide to the Bantu Languages, DOI logo
Simmul, Carl Eric
2024. Information structure of converb constructions: Estonian -des, -mata and -maks constructions. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Aubrey, Rachel & Michael Aubrey
2022. Bibliography of Conditionals. Journal of Translation 18:2 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
2022. The insubordinated infinitive in Makhuwa-Enahara and the expression of feelings. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Letsholo-Tafila, Rose
2018. A Characterisation of Setswana Complex Sentences. Language Matters 49:2 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
van der Wal, Jenneke & Tonjes Veenstra
2015. The long and short of verb alternations in Mauritian Creole and Bantu languages. Folia Linguistica 49:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue