Cover not available

Article published In: Translation Spaces
Vol. 13:2 (2024) ► pp.225–243

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Revising a literary translation for publication

Insights from an autoethnographic study

ORCiD logo with link | University of Malta
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.23040.bor
Abstract
Despite the surge of interest in translation revision and its ubiquitousness in translation processes, minimal scholarly research has been carried out into the revision of literary translations (Koponen, Maarit, Brian Mossop, Isabelle S. Robert, and Giovanna Scocchera (eds). 2021. Translation Revision and Post-Editing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 10). This article responds to calls in the literature for empirical studies examining the creation of actual published translations. It aims to partially address this gap by reporting on the processes and practices occurring during the revision of my Maltese translation of Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt’s Concerto à la mémoire d’un ange. Although numerous translation scholars are also practising translators, we rarely look at our own processes and practices. Not only is this reality of translation revision largely overlooked but also the wealth of empirical data generated during the translation process remains unexploited. Drawing on my own translation practice, this study adopts an autoethnographic approach to provide insights into how revision materialised in this specific literary translation. Meticulously conserved real-life data are analysed in order to shed light on the agents involved in the revision process, their role and power.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and contextualisation
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Findings and analysis
    • 3.1The revision itinerary: A rich description
    • 3.2The network of agents and their interactions during revision
    • 3.3Revision agents: Profiles and roles
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (31)
References
Anderson, Alison. (trans.) 2011. Concerto to the Memory of an Angel by Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt, 2010. New York: Europa Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul. 2006. “Rescuing Autoethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35 (4): 400–404. Accessed May 27, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogic, Anna. 2010. “Uncovering the Hidden Actors with the Help of Latour: The ‘making’ of the Second Sex.” Monografías De Traducción E Interpretación 21: 173–192. Accessed April 14, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borg, Claudine. 2022. A Literary Translation in the Making. A Process-Oriented Perspective. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (trans.) 2021. Kunċert b’Tifkira ta’ Anġlu [Concert in Memory of an Angel] by Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt, 2002. Rabat: Faraxa Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (trans.) 2015. Oscar u s-sinjura r-roża [Oscar and the pink lady] by Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt. Rabat: Faraxa Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouton-Kelly, Ludivine. 2020. “La Traduction Au Brouillon : Une Écriture À L’ouvrage.” Palimpsestes (34): 134–151. Accessed April 27, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buzelin, Hélène. 2007. “Translations in the ‘Making’.” In Constructing a Sociology of Translation, edited by Michaela Wolf, and Alexandra Constructing a Sociology of Translation, 135–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Heewon. 2008. Autoethnography as Method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn. 2008. “Autoethnography.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by Lisa M. Given, 48–51. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2010. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Forum, Qualitative Social Research 12 (1): 40 paragraphs. Accessed July 02, 2010. [URL]
Feinauer, Ilse, and Amanda Lourens. 2017. “The Loyalty of the Literary Reviser: Author, Source Text, Target Text Or Reader?” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 531: 97–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Another Look at Revision in Literary Translation.” In Translation Revision and Post-Editing, edited by Maarit Koponen, Brian Mossop, Isabelle S. Robert, and Giovanna Scocchera, 164–182. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Panel 25. the Reality of Revision. Conference Panel.” Abstract Booklet. EST 2022 Oslo, 338–339.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flick, Uwe. 2018. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 6th edition. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franco Aixelá, Javier. 2001–2022. BITRA (Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation). Open-access database. Accessed July 31, 2023. [URL]
Fryer, Louise. 2020. “Audio Describing Ocean’s Eleven Scene 12 Out of Context: Decision Points in AD Drafting.” Perspectives, Studies in Translatology 28 (6): 896–909. Accessed June 23, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hokkanen, Sari. 2016. To Serve and to Experience: An Autoethnographic Study of Simultaneous Church Interpreting. PhD Thesis, Tampere University.
Kolb, Waltraud. 2013. “‘Who are they?’ Decision-Making in Literary Translation.” In Tracks and Treks in Translation Studies, edited by Catherine Way, Sonia Vandepitte, Reine Meylaerts, and Magdalena Bartlomiejczyk, 207–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koponen, Maarit, Brian Mossop, Isabelle S. Robert, and Giovanna Scocchera (eds). 2021. Translation Revision and Post-Editing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marin-Lacarta, Maialen and Mireia Vargas-Urpi. 2019. “Translators Revising Translators: A Fruitful Alliance.” Perspectives, Studies in Translatology 27 (3): 404–418. Accessed June 22, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIlveen, Peter. 2008. “Autoethnography as a Method for Reflexive Research and Practice in Vocational Psychology.” Australian Journal of Career Development 17 (2): 13–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mossop, Brian. 2007. “Empirical studies of revision: What we know and need to know”. Journal of Specialised Translation 81: 5–20. Accessed January 02, 2024. [URL]
Rajalakshmi, Ratnavel, Varsha Sharma, and Anand Kumar M. 2023. “Context Sensitive Tamil Language Spellchecker Using RoBERTa.” In Speech and Language Technologies for Low-Resource Languages, edited by Anand Kumar M, et al., 51–61. Cham: Springer. Accessed December 30, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna, Florian Windhager, and Matthias Apfelthaler. 2013. “A Dynamic Network Model of Translatorial Cognition and Action.” Translation Spaces 21: 151–182. Accessed August 17, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna, Maija Hirvonen, Regina Rogl, and Jelena Milošević. 2022. “Ethnographic Research.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Methodology, edited by Federico Rundle Zanettin Christopher, 324–339. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, Éric-Emmanuel. 2010. Concerto À La Mémoire D’un Ange [Concert to the Memory of an Angel]. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scocchera, Giovanna. 2016. “Computer-Based Collaborative Revision as a Virtual Lab of Translation Genetics.” Linguistica Antverpiensia: New Series: Themes in Translation Studies 141: 168–199. Accessed June 22, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stratford, Madeleine. 2020. “From Voluptuous Pleasure to Voluptés: Delving into the Literary Translation Process.” Palimpsestes 341: 120–133. Accessed June 23, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatnar Moe, Marija, Tamara Mikolič Južnič, and Tanja Žigon. 2021. “Who Determines the Final Version? The Roles of Translators, Language Revisers and Editors in the Publishing of a Literary Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 22 (1): 14–44. Accessed June 24, 2023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Davier, Lucile
2025. The field diary as a resource for (auto)ethnographies of translation and interpreting. In Field Research on Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 165], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue