In:Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP: Studies in honour of Heribert Picht
Edited by Bassey E. Antia
[Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 8] 2007
► pp. 3–14
Indeterminacy, context, economy and well-formedness in specialist communication
Published online: 9 May 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.8.04and
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.8.04and
In this article I make a contrast between the concepts of indeterminacy and well-formedness on the one hand, and the concepts of vagueness and exactness on the other hand. In the further distinction between determination (degree of vagueness) and specification (degree of generality) I exemplify with the genitive deverbal noun construction in Norwegian. Various approaches to the concept of context are discussed and I apply Kubińsky’s vagueness model to demonstrate that there are some areas of grammar, such as the categorial status of the parts of speech, where the question of membership very seldom arises, although gradience is present.
Keywords: categoriality, context, indeterminacy, well-formedness
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
L’Homme, Marie-Claude
2024. Managing polysemy in terminological resources*. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 30:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Condamines, Anne
2021. How can one explain “deviant” linguistic functioning in terminology?. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 27:2 ► pp. 322 ff.
Ašanin Gole, Pedja & Mateja Mahnič
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
