In:Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation
Edited by Patrick Drouin, Aline Francœur, John Humbley and Aurélie Picton
[Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 18] 2017
► pp. 57–79
Chapter 3Diastratic variation in language for specific purposes
Observations from the analysis of two corpora
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.03pic
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.03pic
In this chapter, we examine the possibility of analyzing diastratic variation in the context of specialized discourse. In order to do so, we first show that diastratic variation is still in need of a clear definition when applied to specialized languages. We then present the results obtained from the analysis of two specialized corpora. The first corpus, in the field of nuclear medicine, contains articles written by experts as well as extracts from machine operator forums. The second corpus is based on texts, documents and websites produced for academic staff in the field of higher education. The information drawn from these corpora shows that diastratic variation does indeed occur within a given field of professional activity, and should be better taken into account by terminologists.
Keywords: diastratic variation, corpora, experts, groups of experts
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Issues and objectives
- 3.Methodological considerations
- 3.1The fields of study and the “communities” of experts chosen
- 3.2Corpus
- 3.3Methodology
- 4.Corpus exploration and results
- 4.1The nuclear medicine corpus
- 4.1.1Apocopes
- 4.1.2Phraseologisms
- 4.1.3Different terminologies
- 4.2The university pedagogy corpus
- 4.2.1Practitioner-experts: Shared but selected and operationalized terminology
- 4.2.2Terminology of expert-researchers: A need for reflexivity and a certain indetermination
- 4.1The nuclear medicine corpus
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (31)
Achard-Bayle, Guy, and Michelle Lecolle (eds). 2009. Sentiments linguistiques et discours spontanés sur le lexique. Metz: Université Paul Verlaine.
Anthony, Laurence. 2005. “AntConc: Design and Development of a Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom.” In Professional Communication Conference, 2005 (IPCC 2005), 729–737.
Antia, Bassey Edem. 2007. Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP: Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Auger, Pierre. 2001. “Essai d’élaboration d’un modèle terminologique/terminographique variationniste.” TradTerm 7: 183–224.
Authier-Revuz, Jacqueline. 2003. “Le fait autonymique: langage, langue, discours: quelques repères.” In Parler des mots. Le fait autonymique en discours, ed. by Jacqueline Authier-Revuz, Marianne Doury, and Sandrine Reboul-Touré, 67–95. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.
Cabré, Maria Teresa. 1998. La terminologie: théories, méthodes et applications. Ottawa, Paris: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa/Armand Colin.
De Ketele, Jean-Marie. 2010. “La pédagogie universitaire: un courant en plein développement.” Revue française de pédagogie 172: 5–13.
Desmet, Isabel. 2007. “Terminologie, culture et société. Éléments pour une théorie variationniste de la terminologie et des langues de spécialité.” Cahiers du Rifal 26: 3–13.
Drouin, Patrick. 2003. “Term Extraction Using Non-technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage.” Terminology 9 (1): 99–115.
Freixa, Judit. 2002. Anàlisi de la variació denomitiva en textos de different grau d’especialització de l’àrea de medi ambient. PhD Thesis. Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Barcelona.
. 2006. “Causes of Denominative Variation in Terminology. A typology proposal.” Terminology 12 (1): 51–77.
. 2003b. “La variation.” In Le grand livre de la langue française, ed. by Marina Yaguello, 91–152. Paris: Seuil.
Gaudin, François. 1993. “Pour une socioterminologie. Des problèmes sémantiques aux pratiques institutionnelles.” In Publications de l’Université de Rouen, 182, Rouen: Université de Rouen.
Huberman, Michael. 1988. “La pédagogie de maîtrise: idées-forces, analyses, bilans.” In Assurer la réussite des apprentissages scolaires. Les propositions de la pédagogie de maîtrise, ed. by Michael Huberman, 12–44. Lausanne: Delachaux and Niestlé.
Kacprzak, Alicja, and Jean-Pierre Goudaillier. 2014. “Dénominations des maladies en langue populaire et argotique (de la ‘synonymite’ des noms de maladies).” e-Scriptat Romanica 1: 1–8.
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington [DC]: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
Ledegen, Gudrun, and Isabelle Léglise. 2013. “Variations et changements linguistiques.” In Sociolinguistique du contact. Dictionnaire des termes et concepts, ed. by Jacky Simonin, and Sylvie Wharton, 315–329. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
Péraldi, Sandrine. 2011. Indétermination terminologique et multidimensionnalité dans le domaine de la chimie organique : analyse à partir d’un corpus spécialisé de langue anglaise. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 7.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Condamines, Anne, Valérie Delavigne, François Gaudin & Aurélie Picton
2025. Socioterminology and Textual terminology. In Terminology throughout History [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 24], ► pp. 233 ff.
Humbert-Droz, Julie
2024. Term circulation and connotation. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 30:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Vezzani, Federica & Rute Costa
2024. Variation in psychopathological terminology. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 30:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Delavigne, Valérie
González Granado, Nicolás, Patrick Drouin & Aurélie Picton
Delavigne, Valérie, Aurélie Picton, Emma Thibert, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
Engberg, Jan
Vezzani, Federica & Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio
2020. Methodology for the standardization of terminological resources. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 26:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Fernández-Silva, Sabela
Maier, Carmen Daniela & Jan Engberg
2019. The multimodal bridge between academics and practitioners in the Harvard Business Review’s digital context. In Science communication on the Internet [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 308], ► pp. 131 ff.
Picton, Aurélie
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
