Article published In: Eurocentrism in Translation Studies
Edited by Luc van Doorslaer and Peter Flynn
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 6:2] 2011
► pp. 121–141
Macro- and micro-turns in translation studies
Published online: 21 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.6.2.01gen
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.6.2.01gen
Definitions of translation studies are changing. While historically focused on the process or product of translation at a national European level, new definitions by scholars such as Mukherjee, Trivedi, Cheung, and Tymoczko are expanding the parameters of translation by exploring how the field is defined in international non-European contexts — in India, China, the Arab world, for example. Other scholars, such as Cronin, Simon, Apter, and Brodzki are looking at subnational locations, including within cities, diasporic communities within cities, and even between generations within individual families in those communities. This paper looks at how translation is defined and studied in such macro- and micro-contexts in the Americas, suggesting that translation is less something that happens between national cultures and more something, especially among immigrants and linguistic minorities, that comprises the very basis upon which those cultures are constructed.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Huang, Qin & Roberto A. Valdeón
Gómez, Isabel
Baer, Brian James & Nike K. Pokorn1
Chang, Nam Fung
2015. Does ‘translation’ reflect a narrower concept than ‘fanyi’?. Translation and Interpreting Studies 10:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
van Doorslaer, Luc
2013. Impact of translation theory. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 4], ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
