Cover not available

Article published In: Unpacking Sign Language Interpreting: Special issue of the Journal on Translation and Interpreting Studies 17:3 (2022)
Edited by Hilde Haualand, Maartje De Meulder and Jemina Napier
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 17:3] 2022
► pp. 455–477

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

‘Help is on the way’

(In)accessible policing in the UK through sign language interpreting

ORCiD logo with link | Heriot-Watt University
ORCiD logo with link | Heriot-Watt University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

This article was made Open Access under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the authors.

Published online: 22 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.21040.ski
Abstract
In the UK, police reforms to meet needs of a diverse society have been limited in the case of deaf signers to an increase in sign language interpreting services (SLIS). This article explores the consequences of this dependence on SLIS by the UK police. We consider how deaf signers’ contact with the police may be inaccessible, despite national frameworks that ‘guarantee’ accessibility through the provision of BSL-English interpreting. We draw on qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with police officers and custody sergeants who describe their experiences of having contact with deaf signers (or other minority language users) through interpreters. We examine and contrast their perceptions and experiences concerning if, when, and how SLIS provided access, as well as its impact on their contact with deaf signers. We compare these findings with UK police reform policies to identify the current state of these provisions along with potential divergences.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Access to policing
    • Police reform, diversity and deaf signers
    • Police perspectives on interpreting
  • Methods
    • Positionality
    • Participants
    • Process and procedure
    • Analysis
  • Results and discussion
    • Understanding accommodation
    • Obtaining accommodation
    • Adapting routine procedures and practices
    • Problematic accommodation
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Bartkowiak-Théron, Isabelle, and Nicole L. Asquith. 2015. “Policing diversity and vulnerability in the post-Macpherson era: Unintended consequences and missed opportunities.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 9(1): 89–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bendazzoli, Claudio. 2016. “The ethnography of interpreter-mediated communication: Methodological challenges in fieldwork.” In Addressing Methodological Challenges in Interpreting Studies Research, ed. by Claudia Monacelli, 3–30. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 2009. Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowling, Ben, and Coretta Phillips. 2012. “Policing ethnic minority communities.” In Handbook of Policing, ed. by Tim Newburn, 528–555. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary. 1999. “Signs of injustice.” The Translator 5(2): 221–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary, and Richard Brown. 1997. Equality before the Law: Deaf People’s Access to Justice. Deaf Studies Research Unit Durham, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brien, David, Richard Brown, and Judith Collins. 2002. The organisation and provision of British Sign Language/English interpreters in England, Scotland and Wales. Unpublished Research Report. University of Durham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunson, Jeremy L. 2007. “Your case will now be heard: Sign language interpreters as problematic accommodations in legal interactions.” The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13(1): 77–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
College of Policing. 2020. “Briefing note: Using language services.” [URL]
Coon, Julie Kiernan. 2016. “Police officers’ attitudes toward diversity issues: Comparing supervisors and non-supervisors on multicultural skills, values, and training.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 18(2): 115–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Meulder, Maartje, and Hilde Haualand. 2021. ‘Sign language interpreting services: A quick fix for inclusion?’ Translation and Interpreting Studies 16(1): 19–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, Emma. 2016. “Interpreting in police settings – The police perspective.” Linguist PD, November. [URL]
Goodman-Delahunty, Jane. 2010. “Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 4(4): 403–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman-Delahunty, Jane, and Loene M. Howes. 2019. “High-stakes interviews and rapport development: Practitioners’ perceptions of interpreter impact.” Policing and Society 29(1): 100–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra, and Jemina Napier. 2013. Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanmer, Jalna, Jill Radford, and Elizabeth A. Stanko. 1989. Women, Policing, and Male Violence (Routledge Revivals): International Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
HMICS. 2018. “Inspection of custody centres across Scotland.” HMICS/2019/04. Improving Policing Across Scotland. HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. [URL]
. 2019. ‘Inspection of the Strategic Arrangements for the Delivery of Police Custody’. HMICS/2019/04. Improving Policing Across Scotland. HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. [URL]
Howes, Loene M. 2020. “Interpreted investigative interviews under the PEACE Interview Model: Police interviewers’ perceptions of challenges and suggested solutions.” Police Practice and Research 21(4): 333 – 350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ImPLI. 2012. ‘ImPLI – Improving Police and Legal Interpreting 2011–2012.’ Final Report. [URL]
Kredens, Krzysztof. 2016. “Conflict or convergence? Interpreters’ and police officers’ perceptions of the role of the public service interpreter.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito 3(2): 65–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Second edition. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leahy, Anne. in prep. “Twentieth-century debates on British law enforcement personnel as interpreters for Deaf people in UK courts.”
Leeson, Lorraine, Jemina Napier, Robert Skinner, Teresa Lynch, Lucia Venturi and Haaris Sheikh, et al. 2017. “Conducting research with deaf sign language users.” In Doing Research in Applied Linguistics: Realities, Dilemmas, and Solutions, ed. by Jim McKinley and Heath Rose, 134–145. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lumsden, Karen, and Alex Black. 2017. “Police Link Officers for Deaf People (PLOD) and video relay services in the East Midlands: Evaluating “what works” and best practice – Unpublished Report.” Victims, Witnesses and Public Protection Network. Loughbrough University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. ‘“Sorry, I’m dead, it’s too late now’: Barriers faced by D/deaf citizens when accessing police services.” Disability & Society 37(3): 476–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, Jennifer. 2002. Qualitative Researching. Second edition. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine, et al. 2014. Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Policing. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCay, Vernon, and Katrina Miller. 2001. ‘Linguistic incompetence to stand trial: A unique condition in some deaf defendants.’ Journal of Interpretation 8: 99–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher. 2020. “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos International Journal 7(1): 92–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mertens, Donna M. 2017. “Transformative research: Personal and societal.” International Journal for Transformative Research 4(1): 18–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monteoliva-Garcia, Eloisa. 2020. “Interpreting or other forms of language support? Experiences and decision-making among response and community police officers in Scotland.” Translation & Interpreting 12(1): 37–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napier, Jemina. 2011. “If a tree falls in the forest, does it make a noise? The merits of publishing interpreting research.” In Advances in Interpreting Research: Inquiry in Action, 121–152. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napier, Jemina, Robert Skinner, Robert Adam, Christopher Stone, Sandra Pratt, Daniel Hinton, and Chijioke Obasi. 2022. “Representation and diversity in the sign language translation & interpreting profession in the United Kingdom.” Interpreting & Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2(2): 119–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napier, Jemina, and Tobias Haug. 2016. “Justisigns: A European Overview of Sign Language Interpreting Provision in Legal Settings.” Law, Social Justice & Global Development 20(2). [URL]
Napier, Jemina, Robert Skinner, Graham H. Turner, Lorraine Leeson, Teresa Lynch, Haaris Sheikh, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Heidi Salaets, Carolien Doggen, Tobias Haug, Barbara Bucher, Barbara Rossier, Michele Berger, and Flurina Krähenbühl, et al. 2022. “Justisigns: Developing research-based training resources on sign language interpreting in police settings in Europe.” In Legal Interpreting: Teaching, Research, and Practice, ed. by Jeremy L. Brunson, 154–190. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perez, Isabelle A., and Christine W. L. Wilson. 2007. “Interpreter-mediated police interviews: Working as a professional team.” In The Critical Link 4, edited by Cecilia Wadensjö, Birgitta Englund Dimitrova, and Anna-Lena Nilsson, 79–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Police Scotland. 2018. ‘Interpreting and Translating Services – Standard Operation Procedure’. Police Scotland. Specialist Crime Division – Safer Communities. 6.00 (Publication Scheme). [URL]
Race, Leanne, and Todd E. Hogue. 2017. ‘“You have the right to remain silent”: Current provisions for D/deaf people within regional police forces in England and Wales.” The Police Journal 91(1): 64–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Debra. 2021. “Critical perspectives on education mediated by sign language interpreters: Inclusion or the illusion of inclusion?” In Critical Perspectives on Plurilingualism in Deaf Education, ed. by Kristin Snoddon and Joanne Weber, 217–238. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silvestri, Marisa, Stephen Tong, and Jennifer Brown. 2013. “Gender and police leadership: Time for a paradigm shift?” International Journal of Police Science & Management 15(1): 61–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skinner, Robert. 2020. Approximately There – Positioning Video-Mediated Interpreting in Frontline Police Services. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh, Heriot-Watt University.
Skinner, Robert, Jemina Napier, and Nicholas R. Fyfe. 2021. “The social construction of 101 non-emergency video relay services for deaf signers.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 23(2): 145–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H. 2011. Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. Fourth Edition. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher, and Bencie Woll. 2008. “Dumb O Jemmy and others: Deaf people, interpreters and the London courts in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.” Sign Language Studies 8(3): 226–240.
Tiselius, Elisabet. 2019. “The (un-) ethical interpreting researcher: Ethics, voice and discretionary power in interpreting research.” Perspectives 27(5): 747–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakefield, Shellee J., et al. 2014. “Perceptions and profiles of interviews with interpreters: A police survey.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 48(1): 53–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitfield, James. 2004. Unhappy Dialogue: The Metropolitan Police and London’s West Indian Community. Willan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, Svenja, and Jemina Napier. 2017. “Rebalancing power: Participatory research methods in interpreting studies.” Translation & Interpreting 9(1): 102–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Stonard, Karlie E., Christopher Stone, John McDaniel, Siobhan Sadlier & Dionne Williams
2025. An Illusion of Inclusion: Charity Workers’ Views on Police Responses to D/deaf Victims of Domestic Abuse. Journal of Family Violence DOI logo
Hulme, Celia, Alys Young, Katherine Rogers & Kevin J. Munro
2023. Cultural competence in NHS hearing aid clinics: a mixed-methods case study of services for Deaf British sign language users in the UK. BMC Health Services Research 23:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue