An empirical investigation of temporal and technical post-editing effort

O'Brien, Sharon

doi:10.1075/tis.2.1.03ob

Article published In: Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2007) ► pp.83–136

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

An empirical investigation of temporal and technical post-editing effort

Sharon O'Brien

Published online: 20 February 2009

https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.2.1.03ob

This article reports on a study designed to quantify temporal and technical post-editing effort in machine translated texts. The study involved two groups of English>German translators, one instructed to post-edit a machine-translated text and the other to translate the same text from English into German. In addition, text segments containing negative translatability indicators (NTIs) were isolated in order to compare the effort involved in post-editing and translating segments with such indicators and without. Results indicate that the post-editing effort for all segments was lower than the translation effort for those segments. Additional results suggest, among other things, that the removal of NTIs may reduce relative post-editing effort overall.

Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Order by:

Fan, Rui & Yue Zhang

2025. Strengths and Limitations of Machine Translation and Human Translation. In Role of AI in Translation and Interpretation [Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, ], ► pp. 95 ff.

Li, Xiaoye, Xiangling Wang & Wentian Lai

2025. The Usability of Neural Machine Translation in Creative-Text Post-Editing: Evidence from Users’ Performance and Perception. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 41:21 ► pp. 13792 ff.

Shormani, Mohammed Q. & Abdulrahaman Alfahad

2025. Artificial Intelligence or Human: The Use of ChatGPT in the Academic Translation for Religious Texts. SAGE Open 15:3

Quinci, Carla

2024. The impact of machine translation on the development of info-mining and thematic competences in legal translation trainees: a focus on time and external resources. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 18:2 ► pp. 290 ff.

Alvarez-Vidal, Sergi & Antoni Oliver

2023. Assessing MT with measures of PE effort. Ampersand 11 ► pp. 100125 ff.

Wang, Yu & Ali Jalalian Daghigh

2023. Cognitive effort in human translation and machine translation post-editing processes. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 21:1 ► pp. 139 ff.

Łoboda, Krzysztof & Olga Mastela

2023. Machine translation and culture-bound texts in translator education: a pilot study. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:3 ► pp. 503 ff.

Rico, Celia

2022. Mind the gap. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 68:5 ► pp. 697 ff.

Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A. & Joseph V. Casillas

2021. Literal is not always easier. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 4:1 ► pp. 98 ff.

Walker, Callum

2021. Eye-Tracking the Reader Experience. In An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation, ► pp. 215 ff.

Yang, Yanxia, Xiangling Wang & Qingqing Yuan

2021. Measuring the usability of machine translation in the classroom context. Translation and Interpreting Studies 16:1 ► pp. 101 ff.

Fonseca, Norma Barbosa de Lima, Cecília Gomes Frugoli & Fabio Alves

2019. Análise do processo tradutório de estudantes de tradução e tradutores profissionais no par linguístico Chinês mandarim => Português europeu. Domínios de Lingugem 13:2 ► pp. 784 ff.

Jia, Yanfang, Michael Carl & Xiangling Wang

2019. Post-editing neural machine translation versus phrase-based machine translation for English–Chinese. Machine Translation 33:1-2 ► pp. 9 ff.

Munková, Daša, Oľga Wrede & Jakub Absolon

2019. Vergleich der menschlichen, maschinellen und Post-Editing-Übersetzung aus dem Slowakischen ins Deutsche mittels automatischer Evaluation. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 64:2 ► pp. 231 ff.

Sun, Sanjun

2019. Measuring Difficulty in Translation and Post-editing: A Review. In Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 139 ff.

마승혜

2018. Expanding the Scope of Machine Translation-Machine Translation Post Editing Strategies for Specific Metaphors in Newspapers. The Journal of Translation Studies 19:2 ► pp. 117 ff.

Mellinger, Christopher D.

2017. Translators and machine translation: knowledge and skills gaps in translator pedagogy. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11:4 ► pp. 280 ff.

Mellinger, Christopher D.

2018. Re-thinking translation quality. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies ► pp. 310 ff.

Screen, Benjamin

2017. Productivity and quality when editing machine translation and translation memory outputs: an empirical analysis of English to Welsh translation. Studia Celtica Posnaniensia 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Alves, Fabio, Arlene Koglin, Bartolomé Mesa-Lao, Mercedes García Martínez, Norma B. de Lima Fonseca, Arthur de Melo Sá, José Luiz Gonçalves, Karina Sarto Szpak, Kyoko Sekino & Marceli Aquino

2016. Analysing the Impact of Interactive Machine Translation on Post-editing Effort. In New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 77 ff.

Yamada, Masaru

2015. Can college students be post-editors? An investigation into employing language learners in machine translation plus post-editing settings. Machine Translation 29:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Pym, Anthony

2014. Translation Skill-Sets in a Machine-Translation Age. Meta 58:3 ► pp. 487 ff.

Koby, Geoffrey S.

2012. Post‐Editing of Machine Translation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Karamanis, Nikiforos, Saturnino Luz & Gavin Doherty

2011. Translation practice in the workplace: contextual analysis and implications for machine translation. Machine Translation 25:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

O’Brien, Sharon

2011. Towards predicting post-editing productivity. Machine Translation 25:3 ► pp. 197 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.