Cover not available

Article published In: Toward Comparative Translation and Interpreting Studies
Edited by Sergey Tyulenev and Binghan Zheng
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 12:2] 2017
► pp. 213–230

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The relative need for Comparative Translation Studies

 | KU Leuven Centre for Translation Studies (CETRA)
Published online: 25 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.12.2.02van
Abstract
This article asks to what extent Comparative Translation Studies is needed and realistic to achieve. The difficulties of comparative approaches in other disciplines are related to translation studies, where ‘comparative’ up to now has been used for several levels of analysis. An important difference with most other disciplines is that comparison seems to be more self-evident in a trans-discipline like translation studies, where transfer between two or more sides is always immanently present. The selection of the units of analysis/comparison is a pitfall, particularly when working with larger units at a systemic or sociocultural level when studying cultural (ex)change. It is suggested that existing tools used in translation studies can be helpful in structuring the approach and the methodology: both mixed-method models from descriptive translation studies and existing conceptual maps in the discipline.
Article outline
  • Clear definitions, fuzzy concepts
  • Levels of comparison and levels of comparative TS
  • Otherness and (ex)change
  • Comparative pitfalls in other disciplines
  • Euro- and other -centrisms
  • Support from maps
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (37)
References
Bachmann-Medick, Doris. 2013. “Translational Turn.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, Volume 41, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 186–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mona. 1993. “Corpus linguistics and Translation Studies. Implications and applications.” In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker, 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burak, Alexander. 2013. The Other in Translation: A Case for Comparative Translation Studies. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casas-Tost, Helena. 2014. “Translating onomatopoeia from Chinese into Spanish: a corpus-based analysis.” Perspectives 22(1): 39–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 2011. “Translation Universals.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, volume 21, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 175–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheung, Martha. 2009. “Introduction – Chinese Discourses on Translation. Positions and Perspectives.” The Translator 15(2): 223–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronin, Michael. 1995. “Altered States. Translation and Minority Languages.” TTR 8(1): 85–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves, and Luc van Doorslaer (eds). 2015. Translation Studies Bibliography, 12th online release, approx. 28,000 items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL] (accessed on 27 May 2016).
González Núñez, Gabriel. 2016. “On Translation Policy.” Target 28(1): 87–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Italiano, Federico. 2016. Translation and Geography. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koster, Cees. 2011. “Comparative approaches to translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, volume 21, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 21–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kothari, Rita, and Judy Wakabayashi (eds.). 2009. Decentering Translation Studies. India and beyond. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, José, and Hendrik van Gorp. 1985. “On Describing Translations.” In The Manipulation of Literature. Studies in Literary Translation, ed. by Theo Hermans, 42–53. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Xiangyu. 2010. “Reflections on the crisis of comparative literature as a discipline.” Frontiers of Literary Studies in China 4(3): 321–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luo, Junjie. 2014. “Translating Jin Ping Mei: a preliminary comparison of The Golden Lotus and The Plum in the Golden Vase .” Perspectives 22(1): 56–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2012. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 2005. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pokorn, Nike K. 2009. “In defence of fuzziness.” In The Metalanguage of Translation, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 135–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reese, Stephen D. 2007. “Theorizing a Globalized Journalism.” In Global Journalism Research. Theories, Methods, Findings, Future, ed. by Martin Löffelholz and David Weaver, 240–252. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roscoe, Paul. 2008. “The Comparative Method.” Religion Compass 2(4): 734–753. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saldanha, Gabriela and Sharon O’Brien. 2013. Research methodologies in translation studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweissinger, Marc J. 2014. Translating German novellas into English. A Comparative Study. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semeryak, Olena. 2015. “Evolución Comparada del Lenguajes Jurídico Ruso y Español. Errores, Anacronismo y su Subsanació en la Interpretación [Comparison of the evolution of the Russian and Spanish legal language. Errors, anachronisms and how to correct them].” FITISPos International Journal 21: 194–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, Zaixi. 2001. “The Chinese and Western translation traditions in comparison.” Across Languages and Cultures 2(1): 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 1995/2012. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, Chung Alan. 2012. “Deconstructing comparative translation: facts, myths and limitations.” Translation Quarterly 661: 77–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria. 2007. Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Why Translators Should Want to Internationalize Translation Studies.” The Translator 15(2): 401–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyulenev, Sergey. 2014. Translation and Society. An Introduction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Doorslaer, Luc. 2009. “Risking conceptual maps: mapping as a keywords-related tool underlying the online Translation Studies Bibliography .” In The Metalanguage of Translation, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “The side effects of the ‘Eurocentrism’ concept.” In Socio-cultural approaches to translation: Indian and European perspectives, ed. by Prabhakara Rao and Jean Peeters, 39–46. New Delhi: Excel India Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017). “A Concept’s Coming of Age. Developments in the Use of the Concept of Culture in Translation Studies.” In Kultur und Übersetzung. Studien zu einem begrifflichen Verhältnis, ed. by Lavinia Heller. 37-50 Bielefeld: transcript.
van Doorslaer, Luc, and Peter Flynn (eds.). 2013. Eurocentrism in Translation Studies. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The Scandals of Translation. Towards an Ethics of Difference. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zornetta, Katia. 2014. “Maíra de Darcy Ribeiro em tradução italiana: análise e reflexão das estratégias tradutórias [The Italian translation of Darcy Ribeiro’s Maíra: analysis and consideration of translational strategies].” In-Traduções 6(10): 384–396.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Fang, Jing & Jirong Guo
2025.  Role of intercultural mediators: identity construction and negotiation in Lin Yutang’s trans-edited The Wisdom of Laotse . Cogent Arts & Humanities 12:1 DOI logo
Downie, Jonathan
2023. A comparative interpreting studies view of interpreting in religious contexts. Translation and Interpreting Studies 18:3 ► pp. 448 ff. DOI logo
Gürçağlar, Şehnaz Tahir
2022. Translation Historiography. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 13:1 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Hyang & Won Jun Nam
2019. The past and future of translation studies in South Korea. Perspectives 27:3 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue