Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach

Lieven, Elena

doi:10.1075/tilar.6.06lie

In:Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: History, methods, perspectives
Edited by Heike Behrens
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 6] 2008
► pp. 61–98

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach

Elena Lieven

Published online: 9 April 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.6.06lie

Cited by (46)

Cited by 46 other publications

Order by:

Dattner, Elitzur, Ronit Levie, Dorit Ravid & Orit Ashkenazi

2021. Patterns of Adaptation in Child-Directed and Child Speech in the Emergence of Hebrew Verbs. Frontiers in Psychology 12

ASHKENAZI, Orit, Steven GILLIS & Dorit RAVID

2020. Input–output relations in Hebrew verb acquisition at the morpho-lexical interface. Journal of Child Language 47:3 ► pp. 509 ff.

Behrens, Heike

2020. From grammatical categories to processes of categorization. In Current perspectives on child language acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 27], ► pp. 91 ff.

Espinosa-Ochoa, Mary Rosa

2019. The Spanish Verbs Estar (To Be) and Ser (To Be) in Child-Directed Speech. Psychology of Language and Communication 23:1 ► pp. 162 ff.

Antonova Ünlü, Elena & Wei Li

2018. The acquisition of the weaker language. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:5 ► pp. 637 ff.

Dixon, Sally

2018. Alyawarr Children’s Use of Two Closely Related Languages. In Language Practices of Indigenous Children and Youth, ► pp. 271 ff.

Ravid, Dorit & Anael Zimmerman

2017. Maternal input at 1;6. In Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 21], ► pp. 35 ff.

Theakston, Anna & Elena Lieven

2017. Multiunit Sequences in First Language Acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3 ► pp. 588 ff.

Ashkenazi, Orit, Dorit Ravid & Steven Gillis

2016. Breaking into the Hebrew verb system: A learning problem. First Language 36:5 ► pp. 505 ff.

Türker, Ebru

2016. The role of L1 conceptual and linguistic knowledge and frequency in the acquisition of L2 metaphorical expressions. Second Language Research 32:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Lustigman, Lyle

2015. Optional opacity: A syntactically-based analysis of early Hebrew verb morphology. First Language 35:6 ► pp. 466 ff.

Ariel, Mira

2014. Orconstructions: Monosemy vs. polysemy. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 333 ff.

Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky

2014. Competition in argument interpretation: Evidence from the neurobiology of language. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 107 ff.

Cristofaro, Sonia

2014. Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 282 ff.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky‐Kröll

2014. Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 180 ff.

Du Bois, John W.

2014. Motivating competitions. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 262 ff.

Francis, Elaine J. & Laura A. Michaelis

2014. Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 70 ff.

Haiman, John

2014. Six competing motives for repetition. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 246 ff.

Haspelmath, Martin

2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 197 ff.

Hawkins, John A.

2014. Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 54 ff.

Helmbrecht, Johannes

2014. Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns: A case study on competing motivations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 315 ff.

Hughes, Mary E. & Shanley E. M. Allen

2014. Competing motivations in children's omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 144 ff.

Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine

2014. Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 348 ff.

Krajewski, Grzegorz & Elena Lieven

2014. Competing cues in early syntactic development. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 163 ff.

Lamers, Monique J. A. & Helen de Hoop

2014. Animate object fronting in Dutch: A production study. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 42 ff.

MacWhinney, Brian

2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 364 ff.

Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik

2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,

Malchukov, Andrej

2014. Resolving alignment conflicts: A competing motivations approach. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 16 ff.

Mondorf, Britta

2014. Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 209 ff.

Moravcsik, Edith

2014. Introduction. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 1 ff.

Newmeyer, Frederick J.

2014. Where do motivations compete?. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 299 ff.

Pfeiffer, Martin

2014. Formal vs. functional motivations for the structure of self‐repair in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 229 ff.

Rowland, Caroline F., Claire Noble & Angel Chan

2014. Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 127 ff.

Strunk, Jan

2014. A statistical model of competing motivations affecting relative clause extraposition in German. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. 88 ff.

Lieven, Elena & Silke Brandt

2011. The constructivist approach: Reply to commentaries. Infancia y Aprendizaje 34:3 ► pp. 319 ff.

Lieven, Elena & Silke Brandt

2011. The constructivist approach. Infancia y Aprendizaje 34:3 ► pp. 281 ff.

Guo, Ling-Yu, Amanda J. Owen & J. Bruce Tomblin

2010. Effect of Subject Types on the Production of AuxiliaryIsin Young English-Speaking Children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53:6 ► pp. 1720 ff.

Chenu, Florence & Harriet Jisa

2009. Reviewing some similarities and differences in L1 and L2 lexical development. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère :Aile... Lia 1 ► pp. 17 ff.

Lieven, Elena

2009. 1. Développement du langage en contexte translinguistique. In Apprentissage des langues, ► pp. 117 ff.

Lieven, Elena

2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120:11 ► pp. 2546 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. List of abbreviations. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. xviii ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Preface. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. vii ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. List of figures and tables. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. xiv ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Copyright Page. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. iv ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Notes on contributors. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ► pp. viii ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Cognitive Aphasiology – A Usage-Based Approach to Language in Aphasia [Constructional Approaches to Language, 31],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.