In:Acquisition of Korean: The state of the art
Edited by Soonja Choi
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 36] 2026
► pp. 117–153
Chapter 4Development of clause chaining and interclausal semantics in Korean children
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This chapter presents the developmental trajectory of clause chaining construction in Korean using
longitudinal mother-child interaction data (ages 2–5 years) and cross-sectional description data (ages 3–10 years, and
adults). Starting from 2 years of age, Korean children connect clauses using appropriate medial suffixes (e.g.,
‑ko, -ese) that express temporal, causal, and contrastive relations between events. By 4 years of
age, Korean children’s clause chains are quite adult-like in their use of medial suffix forms and functions and of the
morphological and syntactic features of clause chains. Further development occurs over several years — with a
milestone at 10 years — in the frequency and the length of clause chains. The chapter highlights special
characteristics of Korean acquisition of clause chaining and places the Korean data in the context of clause chaining
studies in other languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Characteristic features of the clause chaining construction in Korean
- 2.1Medial suffixes and interclausal semantics
- 2.2Clause chain length
- 2.3Non-canonical position and uses of medial clauses
- 2.4Topic continuity and subject marking
- 3.Acquisition of clause chaining in Korean
- 3.1Data base
- 3.2Clause chain development compared with other complex sentence types
- 3.3Development of interclausal semantics: Medial suffix forms and functions
- 3.3.1Early-acquired interclausal semantics: From 2;0 to 2;6
- 3.3.1.1-ko for additive/listing, manner, sequential and contrastive functions
- 3.3.1.2-ese, expressing cause, sequence, and manner
- 3.3.1.3-nuntey expressing circumstance and contrast
- 3.3.1.4-ekaciko expressing sequence and cause
- 3.3.1.5-nikka expressing epistemic reason
- 3.3.1.6‑myen expressing condition
- 3.3.1.7Summary of early acquired interclausal semantics
- 3.3.2Later acquired interclausal semantics: From 2;7 to 4;0
- 3.3.3Early development of interclausal semantics: Cognitive factors and child-directed speech
- 3.3.1Early-acquired interclausal semantics: From 2;0 to 2;6
- 3.4‘Non-canonical’ medial clauses and their pragmatics
- 3.5Developments in clause chaining into adulthood: Clause chain length and topic continuity
- 3.5.1Clause chain length and token frequency of medial suffixes per utterance
- 3.5.2Topic continuity, subject markers and referential choices in clause chains
- 4.Summary and discussion
- 4.1Summary
- 4.2Discussion
- Author queries
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (50)
Ahn, H. (2015). A
corpus-based discourse analysis of Korean grammatical constructions: focus on the multifold functions and
meanings of the pragmatic construction e kaciko (Doctoral
dissertation). University of Southern California. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
Global (Publication No. 2155338538).
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2006). Serial
verb constructions in typological
perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial
verb constructions: A cross-linguistics
typology (pp. 1–68). Oxford University Press.
Akatsuka, N., & Clancy, P. (1992). Conditionality
and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean: Evidence from the emergence of
conditionals. In P. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean
Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 177–192). CSLI.
Aksu-Koç, A., & Ögel-Balaban, H. (2020). Acquisition
of clause combining in Turkish, Frontiers of
Psychology, 11(115), 83–98.
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & Bian, L. (2016). Psychological
reasoning in infancy. Annual Review of
Psychology 67, 159–86.
Bowerman, M. (1986). First
steps in acquiring conditionals. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On
conditionals (pp. 285–308). Cambridge University Press.
Chae, H.-R. (2015). A
comprehensive syntactic analysis of Korean [… V … V] expressions: Converb constructions and types of
gaps. Korean Journal of
Linguistics, 40, 703–746.
Chafe, W. (Ed.) (1980). The
pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative
production. Ablex.
Chang, J.-A., Kim, S., Shin, J., & Yi, B. (2008). A
study on syntactic development in spontaneous speech. Mal
Soli [Sound of
Language], 68, 17–32.
Choi, S., & Kim, S. (2022). International
pragmatic research on Korean. In S. Chen & D. D. Wu (Eds.), East
Asian pragmatics: Commonalities and
variations (pp. 135–150). Routledge.
Clancy, P. (1992). Referential
strategies in the narratives of Japanese children. Discourse
Processes, 15, 441–467.
Clancy, P., Jacobsen, T., & Silva, M. (1976). The
acquisition of conjunction: A cross-linguistic study. Papers and Reports on
Child Language
Development, 12, 71–80. CSLI.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2009). The
semantics of clause linking in typological
perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon, & A. Aikhenvald (Eds.), The
semantics of clause linking: A cross-linguistic
typology (pp. 1–55). Oxford University Press.
Hwang, H. (2023). The
influence of discourse continuity on referential form choice. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 47, 626–641.
Jang, M., & Kim, J. M. (2014). Use
of connective endings as a connective function and connective endings as a final function in the spontaneous
language of typically developing preschoolors. Journal of Speech-Language &
Hearing
Disorders, 23(4), 89–100.
Jendraschek, G., & Shin, Y. (2018). Korean
converbs between coordination and
subordination. Linguistics, 56(5), 1099–1140.
Jin, O. H., & Choi, Y. (2009). A
comparison of the characteristic use of conjunctions during narrative production by children ages five, seven,
and nine. Journal of Speech-Language & Hearing
Disorders, 18(1), 17–35.
Kang, N. (2021). Differences
between Korean null arguments and Korean overt pronouns. Advances in Social
Sciences Research
Journal, 8(11), 378–388.
Kim, H. (1992). Clause
combining in discourse and grammar: An analysis of some Korean clausal connectives in
discourse (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i). ProQuest Dissertations and These
Global (Publication No. 303972503).
Kim, J.-M., Yoon, M.-S., Kim, S.-J., Chang, M.-S., & Cha, J. (2012). Utterance
types in typically developing preschoolers. Korean Journal of Communications
Disorders, 17, 488–498
Kim, K.-h. (2018). Enhancing
solidarity through dispreferred format: The nuntey-clause in Korean conversation as a
normative basis for leveraging action. East Asian
Pragmatics, 3(1), 27–57.
Kim, Y.-j. (1997). The
acquisition of Korean. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The
crosslinguistic study of language
acquisition (Vol. 4, pp. 335–435). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kirkham, N., Richardson, D., Slemmer, J., & Johnson, S. (2007). Location,
location, location: Development of spatiotemporal sequence learning in
infancy. Child
Development, 78, 1559–1571.
Kwon, N., & Polinsky, M. (2005). What
does coordination look like in a head-final language? Paper presented at
International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Seoul, Korea.
Lee, S. (1992). The
syntax and semantics of serial verb constructions (Doctoral
dissertation). University of Washington. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
Global (Publication No. 303994025).
Lee, S.-h., Lee, P.-y., & Im, Y.-j. (2003). The
study on the process of the acquisition of final endings: A case of Korean children under 36
months. Research in Korean Language
Education, 18, 319–345.
Lee, Y., Oh, S., Choi, J., Yang, E., Lim, S., Kim, H., Choi, J., & Kim, H. (2023). Development
of connective endings use in spontaneous language of 2–6-year-old
children. Communication Sciences &
Disorders, 28(3), 421–434.
Levine, D., Buchsbaum, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (2018). Finding
events in a continuous world: A developmental account. Developmental
Psychology, 61, 376–389.
Meyer, M., & Baldwin, D. (2011). Statistical
learning of action: The role of conditional probability. Learning
Behavior, 39, 383–398.
Moon, S. (2019). Can
Jongsok-Jeol in Korean be classified as adverbial clauses? Korean Journal of
Linguistics, 44(3), 489–532.
Pace, A., Carver, L. J., & Friend, M. (2013). Event-related
potentials to intact and disrupted actions in children and adults. Journal of
Experimental Child
Psychology, 116, 453–70.
Park, Y.-Y. (1999). The
Korean discourse connective nuntey in conversational
discourse. Journal of
Pragmatics, 31, 191–218.
Pyoun, J. Y. (2011). The
Syntax and semantics of Korean serial verb constructions: A corpus-based
analysis (Unpublished master’s thesis). San Diego State University.
Reilly, J. S. (1986). The
acquisition of temporals and conditionals. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On
conditionals (pp. 309–332). Cambridge University Press.
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2009). A
cognitive approach to the development of early language. Child
Development, 80, 134–150.
Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L., Ambridge, B., & Twomey, K. E. (Eds.) (2020). Current
perspectives on child language acquisition: How children use their environment to
learn. John Benjamins.
Sarvasy, H. (2015). Breaking
the clause chains: Non-canonical medial clauses in Nungon. Studies in
Language 39(3), 664–696.
Sarvasy, H. S. (2024). Clause
chaining in Papuan languages. In N. Evans & S. Fedden (Eds.), Oxford
guide to Papuan
languages (pp. 187–229). Oxford University Press.
Sarvasy, H., & Aikhenvald, A. (Eds.). (2024). Clause
chaining in the languages of the world. Oxford University Press.
Sarvasy, H., & Choi, S. (2020). Beyond
the two-clause sentence: Acquisition of clause chaining in six
languages. Frontiers of
Psychology, 11, 1586.
(2024). The
acquisition of clause chaining. In H. Sarvasy & A. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Clause
chaining in the languages of the
world (pp. 60–96). Oxford University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic
evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.) The
crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical
issues (pp. 1157–1256). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1995). Converbs
in Turkish child language: The grammaticalization of event
coherence. In M. Haspelmath & E. König (Eds.), Converbs
in crosslinguistic
perspective (pp. 349–371). Mouton de Gruyter.
