In:Usage-based Perspectives on Language and Language Acquisition: In honour of Heike Behrens
Edited by Karin Madlener-Charpentier, Marjolijn H. Verspoor, Mirjam Weder and Annelies Häcki Buhofer
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 35] 2026
► pp. 69–110
Chapter 3What’s in a word?
Cognitive-linguistic, corpus-linguistic, neuroscientific, AI, psycholinguistic, and usage-based perspectives
Authors
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
How do words mean? Scholars have historically taken
different views. Shakespeare
(1597) and de Saussure
(1916) emphasized signification; Firth (1957) “you shall know a word by the
company it keeps”; and Wittgenstein (1953) “in most cases meaning is use”.
These maxims have influenced major contemporary research areas —
signification imbues structuralism, semiotics,
cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics, embodied (4E) cognition,
and neuroscience; lexical
company inspires corpus
linguistics, computer science, and artificial intelligence (AI); and
usage-based
approaches relate everyday social use
to language acquisition and pedagogy. This chapter examines the
historical and logical lineages of these ideas. Language is a
complex adaptive system involving many types of agents — words and
meanings, speeches and texts, speakers and social groups, cultures
and customs. In language learning, signification, lexical company,
and social usage are separable but symbiotic sources to meaning. In
words, these sources of information are fused together. And who has
done the fusing? You. You contain multitudes. You are a strange
loop, an agentive self-referential hierarchical conscious system,
who has hosted and dynamically merged these three complementary
streams of information over the course of your lifetime, from before
your first word, probably some version of mother,
to now. This chapter reviews how.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Signification
- 2.1Shakespeare
- 2.2Saussure
- 2.2.1 Syntagmatic relations
- 2.2.2 Associative relations
- 2.3Associationism
- 2.3.1James
- 2.3.2Paivio: Imageability and concreteness effects
- 2.4Cognitive psychology
- 2.5
Symbol
grounding
- 2.5.1The Chinese room argument
- 2.5.2The symbol grounding problem
- 2.5.3Perceptual symbol systems
- 2.6Psycholinguistics: Frequency and imageability
- 2.7Embodied cognition
- 2.8Cognitive Linguistics
- 2.9Neuroscience and concomitant dependency
- 2.10Signification in sum
- 3.Lexical company
- 3.1Corpus linguistics
- 3.2Phraseology
- 3.3Using corpora to investigate words and phrases
- 3.3.1Hand
- 3.3.2Back
- 3.3.3Ass
- 3.4Construction Grammar
- 3.5Connectionism and triangulation
- 3.6Associations and absences
- 3.7Lexical company, AI, and LLMs
- 4.Social usage
- 4.1Meaning in social usage
- 4.2Language learning from social usage
- 5.In a WORD: The associative-cognitive CREED
- 6.Emergence
- 6.1Language as a Complex Adaptive System (LaCAS)
- 6.2The units of language
- 6.3The sources of word meaning
Notes References
References (177)
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical
approaches. Cambridge University Press.
Aziez, F., Bátyi, S., Pfenninger, S., & Verspoor, M. (2026). A longitudinal dynamic usage-based study on peer
interaction at an Indonesian pesantren. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language
acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from
features to meaning (a travel update). In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 285–375). Elsevier.
Bates, E., Dale, P., Fenson, L., Hartung, J., Marchman, V., Reilly, J., Reznick, J. S., & Thal, D. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the
composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 85–123.
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position
paper. Language Learning, 59(s1), 1–26.
Behrens, H. (2008). Corpora in language acquisition research: History,
methods, perspectives. John Benjamins.
(2017). The role of analogy in language processing and
acquisition. In M. Hundt, S. Moulin, & S. E. Pfenninger (Eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic
perspectives (pp. 215–239). Cambridge University Press.
Behrens, H., & Pfänder, S. (Eds.). (2016). Experience counts: Frequency effects in
language. De Gruyter.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can
language models be too big? Facct’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on
fairness, accountability, and transparency, 610–623.
Berger, C., Crossley, S., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Using lexical features to investigate second
language lexical decision performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 911–935.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education.
Biber, D., & Reppen, D. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus
linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Brown,
C. H. (2013).
Hand
and
arm. In M. S. Dryer &
M. Haspelmath (Eds.),
WALS
Online (v2020.3)
[Data
set].
Zenodo. [URL];
Brysbaert, M., & Biemiller, A. (2017). Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44
thousand English word meanings. Behavioral Research Methods, 49(4), 1520–1523.
Bybee, J. L. (2005). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to
repetition. Linguistic Society of America.
Cadierno, T., & Eskildsen, S. W. (Eds.). (2015). Usage-based perspectives on second language
learning. De Gruyter Mouton.
Coltheart, M. (2001). Assumptions and methods in cognitive
neuropsychology. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits
reveal about the human mind (pp. 3–21). Psychology Press.
Cortese, M. J., McCarty, D. P., & Schock, J. (2015). A mega recognition memory study of 2897
disyllabic words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1489–1501.
Crossley, S. A., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Examining lexical development in second language
learners: An approximate replication of Salsbury, Crossley,
& McNamara (2011). Language Teaching, 52(3), 385–405.
Davies, M. (2004). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). [URL]
(2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English
(COCA). [URL]
Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for
distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 50–80.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a
multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.
(1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking,
and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91–126.
(2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge University Press.
(2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A
review with implications for theories of implicit and
explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
(2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The
emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Blackwell.
(2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of
explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
(2006a). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The Associative
Cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100–121.
(2006c). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in
SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference,
overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual
learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31.
(2007). Dynamic systems and SLA: The wood and the
trees. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 10, 23–25.
(2011). The emergence of language as a complex adaptive
system. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 666–679). Routledge.
(2012). Formulaic language and second language
acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44.
(2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their
dynamic interface and complexity in P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). John Benjamins.
(2017). Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating
research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67, 40–65.
(2022). Second language learning of
morphology. Journal of the European Second Language
Association 6(1), 34–59.
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language
vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559–617.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency,
frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370–386.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for Applied
Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), whole issue.
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2014). The processing of verb-argument constructions is
sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and
prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 55–98.
(2015). Usage-based language learning. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 163–180). John Wiley and Sons.
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions:
Usage-based approaches to acqusition and
processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604–620.
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Language usage, acquisition, and processing: Cognitive
and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second-language
speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and
TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2014). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An
introduction (2nd ed., pp. 75–93). Routledge.
(2015). Second language acquisition. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 409–431). De Gruyter Mouton.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on
development. The MIT Press.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2026). Second language learning as local and long-term
process in and for social interaction. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language
acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Fallon, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2024). Language at a glance: How our brains grasp
linguistic structure from parallel visual
input. Science Advances, 10(43).
Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 120–126.
Feynman, R. P. (2010). “Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!”: Adventures of a
curious character. WW Norton & Company.
Frackowiak, R. S. J., Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., Price, C. J., Zeki, S., Ashburner, J., & Penny, W. (Eds.). (2004). Human brain function (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A. (2016). Wordbank: An open repository for developmental
vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language, 44(3), 677–694.
Freud, S. (1891 [1953]). On aphasia; A critical study (E. Stengel, Trans.). International Universities Press.
Frith, C. (2010). What is consciousness for? Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(3), 497–551.
Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2010). The social brain: Allowing humans to boldly go
where no other species has been. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 365, 165–175.
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Blackwell.
Geeraerts, D. (1995). Cognitive Linguistics. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 111–116). John Benjamins.
Godfroid, A., & Hopp, H. (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition
and psycholinguistics. Taylor & Francis.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to
argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
(2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to
language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224.
(2008). Construction learning and second language
acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language
acquisition (pp. 207–225). Routledge.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure
generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289–316.
Gries, S. T. (2019). 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue
additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of
corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), 385–412.
Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics.
Language Learning, 65(S1, Special Issue: Currents in Language Learning Series: Improving and
Extending Quantitative Reasoning in Second Language
Research), 28–255.
Hoey, M. (2004). The textual priming of lexis. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp. 21–41). John Benjamins.
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of
thinking. Basic Books.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern Grammar: A corpus driven approach to the lexical
grammar of English. John Benjamins.
Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that
tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453–458.
Jackson, J. H. (1893). Words and other symbols in
mentation. Medical Press and Circular, ii, 205. Reprinted In Brain, 1915, xxxviii.
Klatt, M., & Pfänder, S. (2026). Scaffolding: A contribution to the Interaction
Acquisition Support System. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language
acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Klein, W. (1998). The contribution of second language acquisition
research. Language Learning, 48, 527–550.
Köylü, Z. (2026). Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2
English: The case of sojourners. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language
acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic
approaches. Oxford University Press.
Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech-learning gated by the ‘social
brain’? Developmental Science, 10, 110–120.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories
reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical
prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
(2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). CSLI.
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language
development. Oxford University Press.
Lieven, E. V. M. (2014). First language development: A usage-based
perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language 41(S1), 48–63.
Lieven, E. V. M., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage based
approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333–370.
Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a
usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language
acquisition (pp. 168–196). Routledge.
Littlemore, J. (2023). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language
learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Long, M. H. (1982). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in
the second language classroom. In M. Long & J. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 339–354). Newbury House.
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language
teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural
perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.
(1996). The role of linguistic environment in second
language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisitiom (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
(2006). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75–117). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2006). Introduction to the Special Issue
on Interaction Research. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 28(2), 169–178.
(2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, Vol 2:
The Database (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Dissociating language and thought in large
language models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(6), 517–540.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). Recognition times for 62 thousand English words:
Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 741–760.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
McManus, K. (Ed.). (2024). Usage in second language acquisition: Critical
reflections and future directions. Routledge.
(2009). WordNet — About us. [URL]
Parkinson, J., & Coxhead, A. (2023). Learning workplace language in a vocational
educational setting. In M. Chan (Ed.), Perspectives on teaching workplace English in the 21st
Century (pp. 208–229). Routledge.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike
selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). Longman.
Penfield, W., & Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the
cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical
stimulation. Brain, 60(4), 389–443.
Popham, S. F., Huth, A. G., Bilenko, N. Y., Deniz, F., Gao, J. S., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., & Gallant, J. L. (2021). Visual and linguistic semantic representations
are aligned at the border of human visual
cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 24(11), 1628–1636.
(2003). The neuroscience of language. On brain circuits of words
and serial order. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language
acquisition. Routledge.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural
categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Rowland, C. F., Jones, G., Peter, M. L., Bidgood, A., Jessop, A., Durrant, S., Stinson, P., & Pine, J. M. (2026). Explaining individual differences in children’s
vocabulary growth: Insights from the Language 0–5
Project. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language
acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating
errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language
learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
Shakespeare, W. (1597, 2000). Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 2, lines 36–54. Published for the Malone Society by Oxford University Press.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formulas List (AFL). Applied Linguistics, 31, 487–512.
Sinclair, J. M. (1966). Beginning the study of lexis. In C. E. Bazell (Ed.), In Memory of J.R. Firth (pp. 410–430). Longmans.
Sinclair,
J. M. (2008).
The
phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the
phrase.
In S. Granger &
F. Meunier
(Eds.), Phraseology:
An interdisciplinary
perspective
(pp. 407–410).
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2018). Understanding formulaic language: A second language
acquisition perspective. Routledge.
Slobin, D. (2026). The wealth of the stimulus. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language
acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Slobin, D. I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond
the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language
acquisition (Vol. 5, pp. 265–323). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes
they generate: A step towards second language
learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
Tomasello, M. (Ed.). (1998). The mew psychology of language: Cognitive and functional
approaches to language structure. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of
language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden
path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385–395.
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning:
Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge.
Varela, F.,
Thompson, E.,
& Rosch,
E. (1991). The
embodied mind: Cognitive science and human
experience MIT Press.
Wilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]
