Cover not available

In:Usage-based Perspectives on Language and Language Acquisition: In honour of Heike Behrens
Edited by Karin Madlener-Charpentier, Marjolijn H. Verspoor, Mirjam Weder and Annelies Häcki Buhofer
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 35] 2026
► pp. 40–68

Chapter 2
Scaffolding

A contribution to the Interaction Acquisition Support System (IASS)

Authors
 | University of Freiburg
 | University of Freiburg
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article proposes a micro-sequential and multimodal approach to scaffolding in parent-child interactions. We argue for a more detailed understanding of how parents manage to transform their scaffolding into a time-limited intervention, transferring responsibility for the task to the child as soon as possible. In a social-interactional perspective following usage-based accounts of language acquisition (Tomasello, 2003), adults play a supportive role, helping children to develop linguistic and discourse skills through structured and dialogical interactions (cf. the Language Acquisition Support System LASS, Bruner, 1981, and the Discourse Acquisition Support System DASS, Hausendorf & Quasthoff, 2005). Whereas traditional approaches focus on asymmetry — where adults model and correct language — a more dynamic perspective, namely the Interaction Acquisition Support System (IASS, Behrens & Pfänder, 2024), recognises interaction as a collaborative and dynamic process. Based on the notions of contingency, fading and transfer (Van de Pol, Volman, & Beishuizen, 2010), we propose a more nuanced view of these three elements of caregivers’ scaffolding. Based on recordings of French families living in Germany, we present a refined scaffolding approach that provides a detailed understanding of how parents manage to limit their intervention while encouraging their child’s active agency.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Framework and research questions
  • 2.Scaffolding in language learning: A brief review of prior research
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1The French IluPE Corpus (Klatt, 2020-2024)
    • 3.2Method: Micro-sequential analysis of scaffolding elements
  • 4.Two case studies on scaffolding in playing with stacking rings
    • 4.1Example 1: Stacking rings — father and son
    • 4.2Example 2: Stacking rings — mother and daughter
  • 5.Scaffolding revisited: Toward a microsequential and radically multimodal account of temporary support in play interactions
    • 5.1Contingency revisited
    • 5.2Fading revisited
    • 5.3Transfer revisited
    • 5.4Scaffolding revisited — Answers to our research questions
  • 6.Discussion: Scaffolding as part and parcel of an Interaction Acquisition Support System
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (53)
References
Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic sssessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, H., Madlener, K., & Skoruppa, K. (2016). The role of scaffolding in children’s questions: Implications for (preschool) language assessment from a usage-based perspective. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4, 237–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, H., & Pfänder, S. (2025). Spielend kooperieren lernen. Perspektiven für die Spracherwerbsforschung. In N. Proske, T. Weber, & M. Dannerer (Eds.), Gesprochenes Deutsch. Struktur, Variation, Interaktion. Jahrbuch des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 2024 (pp. 401–424). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bigelow, A., MacLean, K., & Proctor, J. (2004). The role of joint attention in the development of infants’ play with objects. Developmental Science, 7(5), 518–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1981). The social context of language acquisition. Language & Communication 1(2–3), 155–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchholz, M. & Dittmann, M. (2017). Rhythm and groove — Observing evenly hovering attention. Presented at the Conference Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies IV. International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conner, D., & Cross, D. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of the presence, efficacy and stability of maternal scaffolding during informal problem-solving interactions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 315–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A., & Haugh, M. (Eds.). (2022). Action ascription in interaction. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2021). Longitudinal conversation analysis — Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 127–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreyer, F., Schumann, E., Behrens, H., Buchheim, A., Fegert, J., Gündel, H., Karabatsiakis, A., Köhler-Dauner, F., Scheidt, C. E., Waller, C., Ziegenhain, Z., & Pfänder, S. (2024). Joint responses to crying: How mothers and their children comfort crying babies. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 8(1), 57–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R.; Feuerstein, R.; Falik, L. & Rand, Y. (2003). The Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The learning propensity assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. ICELP Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haataja, E. (2021). Understanding the role of gaze in momentary teacher-student scaffolding interaction during collaborative problem solving (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammond, J. & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 99–111. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han-Pile, B. (2020). The doing is everything: A middle-voiced reading of agency in Nietzsche. Inquiry, 63(1), 42–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hausendorf, H., & Quasthoff, U. (2005). Sprachentwicklung und Interaktion: Eine linguistische Studie zum Erwerb von Diskursfähigkeiten. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2009). How do families help or hinder the emergence of early executive function? New directions in child and adolescent development, 123, 35–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, W., & Lanwer, J. (2019). Interaktionale Linguistik: Eine Einführung. J. B. Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klatt, M. (2024). Multimodaler Spracherwerb: Die Entwicklung der kooperativen Nichtzustimmung bei deutschen und französischen Kindern. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klatt, M., & Krug, M. (2023). Von der Disalignierung zum Disengagement: Aushandlung von Partizipation in konfliktären Eltern-Kind-Interaktionen. fokus:interaktion, 1, 29–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, D. (2023). Jemandem eine Stimme geben. Polyphone und polykinetische Äußerungen im Sprechen von Angesicht zu Angesicht. Nihin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. In B. Stierer & J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy, and learning in educational practice (pp. 92–110). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Multimodality in Conversation Analysis. In J. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of methods in conversation analysis (pp. 700–742). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Eskilden, S. W. (2022). Emergent L2 grammars in and for social interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 106, 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, S., Voutilainen, L., Lehtinen, M., & Wuolio, M. (2021). From engagement to disengagement in a psychiatric assessment process. Symbolic Interaction, 45(2), 257–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfänder, S., Schumann, E., Behrens, H., Buchheim, A., & Freyburger, P. (2024a). Participation practices in mother-child interactions: Longitudinal case studies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(3), 1673–1697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfänder, S., Schumann, E., Freyburger, P., Behrens, H., & Buchheim, A. (2024b). „So… und jetzt drunter schieben!“ — Zur Herstellung von Partizipation in joint activities von Mutter und Kind. Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 25, 1–27. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfänder, S., & Sell, C. (forthcoming). Struggling for resonance: Mediopassive interaction in a long-term treatment of severe personality disorder.
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U., Heller, V., & Morek, M. (Eds.). (2021). Diskurserwerb in Familie, Peergroup und Unterricht: Passungen und Teilhabechancen. De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 273–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sell, C. (2022). Medio-passive agency in psychoanalysis: Responding to hopelessness and despair in the therapeutic relationship. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 32(4), 353–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A, Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., Stukenbrock, A., & Uhmann, S. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 10, 353–402. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smit, J., Van Eerde, H., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817–834. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based account of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Braak, M., Van De Pol, J., Poorthuis, A., & Mainhard, T. (2021). A micro-perspective on students’ behavioral engagement in the context of teachers’ instructional support during seatwork: Sources of variability and the role of teacher adaptive support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher — student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 193–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue