In:First Language Acquisition in Finno-Ugric Languages
Edited by Minna Kirjavainen, Ágnes Lukács and Virve-Anneli Vihman
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 33] 2025
► pp. 271–309
The acquisition of Hungarian morphology and syntax
Published online: 13 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.33.09bab
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.33.09bab
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the acquisition of morphosyntax in Hungarian as a first language.
Hungarian presents particular challenges for language development due to its rich, largely agglutinative morphology and
pragmatically governed, non-configurational word order. Drawing on data from experimental studies, naturalistic corpora, and
longitudinal observations, the chapter outlines the development of case marking, verb agreement, possessive constructions,
verbal prefixes, spatial expressions, and argument structure. It also examines how Hungarian-speaking children acquire
sensitivity to word order and pragmatic functions, including topic-focus structure and verbal prefix placement. The findings
indicate early productivity in morphology, with noun morphology preceding verb morphology, and a gradual acquisition of
syntactic patterns influenced by morphological marking and processing demands. The chapter also discusses the role of
allomorphy and discourse-related variation, and includes evidence from both typical and atypical development. The typological
properties of Hungarian offer insight into how language-specific features interact with general mechanisms of morphosyntactic
development.
Keywords: allomorphy, case and agreement, focus, verbal prefixes, word order
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The acquisition of Hungarian morphology
- 2.1A brief description of Hungarian morphology
- 2.2Case marking and allomorphy in child language
- 2.2.1Acquisition of allomorphy classes in nouns
- 2.2.2Experimental results of early productivity
- 2.2.3The acquisition of spatial terms in Hungarian
- 2.2.4Possessive marking
- 2.3Agreement marking
- 2.4Verbal prefixes
- 3.The acquisition of Hungarian syntax
- 3.1Argument structure
- 3.1.1The mapping of thematic roles: Experimental data
- 3.1.2Patterns of implicit and explicit subjects and objects in early child language: CHILDES data
- 3.2Word order and information packaging in Hungarian
- 3.2.1The development of prefix-verb inversion in production
- 3.2.2The interpretation of focus
- 3.3Relative clauses
- 3.1Argument structure
- 4.Normative data on grammatical development
- 5.Summary and future directions
References
References (83)
Babarczy, A. (2002). A
path from broader to narrower grammars: The acquisition of argument structure in English and
Hungarian. Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2017 Block
15. The University of Edinburgh.
(2005). Implicit
subjects in early child language. In Proceedings of ICSH
7 (pp. 29–31). Veszprém, Hungary.
(2007). Measures
of complexity in language acquisition. In G. Sampson, D. Gil, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language
complexity as an evolving
variable (pp. 200–220). Oxford University Press.
Babarczy, A., & Balázs, A. (2016). A
kognitív kontroll és a preverbális fókusz
értelmezése. In B. Kas (Ed.), Szavad
ne feledd! Tanulmányok Bánréti Zoltán
tiszteletére (pp. 151–164). MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet.
Babarczy, A., Káldi, T., & Kas, B. (2021). An
eye-tracking study of thematic role identification heuristics in toddlers. Dubrovnik
Conference in Cognitive Science: Linguistic and Cognitive Foundations of Meaning, 18–21 May.
Babarczy, A., Gábor, B., Hamp, G., Rung, A., & Szakadát, I. (2005). Hunpars:
A rule-based sentence parser for Hungarian. In Proceedings of
the 6th International Symposium on Computational
Intelligence. ACM.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2012). TROG
— Test for Reception of Grammar (Kézikönyv). OS Hungary Tesztfejlesztő Kft.
Bowerman, M. (1996). The
origins of children’s spatial semantic categories. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking
linguistic
relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge University Press.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning
to express motion events in English and
Korean. Cognition, 41, 83–121.
Dąbrowska, E. (2005). Low-level
schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case
inflections. Language
Sciences, 28, 120–135.
(2006). Low-level
schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case
inflections. Language
Sciences, 28(1), 120–135.
Dąbrowska, E., & Szczerbiński, M. (2006). Polish
children’s productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological
diversity. Journal of Child
Language, 33, 559–597.
Dankovics, N., & Pléh, C. (2001). Hangrestaurációs
jelenségek és alaktani feldolgozás a magyarban: Azt halljuk-e, amit
várunk? In C. Pléh & Á. Lukács (Eds.), A
magyar morfológia
pszicholingvisztikája (pp. 55–83). Osiris.
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. (1993). The
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. User’s guide and technical
manual. Singular.
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates
Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. Paul H. Brookes.
Gerőcs, M., Babarczy, A., & Surányi, B. (2014). Exhaustivity
in focus: Experimental evidence from Hungarian. In J. Emonds & M. Janebová (Eds.), Language
use and linguistic
structure (pp. 181–195). Palacký University Press.
Gábor, B., & Lukács, Á. (2012). Early
morphological productivity in Hungarian: Evidence from sentence repetition and elicited
production. Journal of Child
Language, 39, 411–442.
Halácsy, P., Kornai, A., & Oravecz, C. (2003). The
Hungarian web corpus. In Proceedings of the Third
International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC
2003), 203–210.
Johnston, J. R., & Slobin, D. (1978). The
development of locative expressions in English, Serbo-Croatian, and Turkish. Journal of
Child
Language, 6, 529–545.
Káldi, T., Babarczy, A., & Bende-Farkas, Á. (2016). Hungarian
focus: Presuppositional content and exhaustivity
revisited. In Language use and linguistic structure.
Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics
Colloquium (pp. 45–262). Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
Káldi, T., & Babarczy, A. (2018). Linguistic
exhaustivity inference is context dependent: A visual-world eye-tracking study on Hungarian
focus. Acta Linguistica
Academica, 65(4), 547–595.
(2021). Linguistic
focus guides attention during the encoding and refreshing of Working Memory
content. Journal of Memory and
Language, 116, 104187.
Kas, B., & Lukács, Á. (2012). Processing
relative clauses by Hungarian typically developing children. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 27(4), 500–538.
(2013). Focus
sensitivity in Hungarian adults and children. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 60(2), 217–245.
Kas, B., & Lőrik, J. (2024). Fejlődési
trendek és variancia a korai magyar nyelvelsajátításban. Általános Nyelvészeti
Tanulmányok, XXXVI, 165–193.
Kas, B., Jakab, Z., & Lőrik, J. (2022). Development
and norming of the Hungarian CDI-III: A screening tool for language
delay. International Journal of Language & Communication
Disorders, 57(2), 252–273.
Kas, B., & Józsa, F. (2017). Birtokos
morfológia használata a magyarban specifikus nyelvi zavart mutató és tipikusan fejlődő
gyerekeknél. In Z. Bánréti (Ed.), Általános
Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok, XXIX, Kísérletes
nyelvészet (pp. 359–384). Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kas, B., Lőrik, J., & Bertalan, R. F. (2017). A
korai nyelvi-kommunikációs fejlettség új mérőeszköze, a MacArthur-Bates Kommunikatív Fejlődési Adattár 3. (KOFA–3)
alapjai és gyakorlati alkalmazási
lehetőségei. Logopédia, 2(1), 41–56.
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., Mironova, N., Pershukova, A., & Fedorova, O. (2007). Playing
with word endings: Morphological variation in the learning of Russian noun
inflections. British Journal of Developmental
Psychology, 25, 55–77.
Kempe, V., Ševa, N., Brooks, P. J., Mironova, N., Pershukova, A., & Fedorova, O. (2009). Elicited
production of case-marking in Russian and Serbian children: Are diminutive nouns easier to
inflect? First
Language, 29, 147–165.
Kiefer, F. (1987). The
cases of Hungarian nouns. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum
Hungaricae 37,(1–4), 93–101.
Király, I., Pléh, C., & Racsmány, M. (2001). The
language of space in Hungarian. In T. E. Németh (Ed.), Cognition
in language use: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics
Conference (pp. 181–192). IprA.
Landau, B. (1994). Where
is what and what is where: The language of objects in
space. In L. Gleitman & B. Landau (Eds.), The
acquisition of the
lexicon (pp. 259–296). The MIT Press.
Leonard, L. B., Lukács, Á., & Kas, B. (2012). Tense
and aspect in childhood language impairment: Contributions from Hungarian. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 33, 305–328.
Lukács, Á. (2001). Szabályok
és kivételek: A kettős modell érvényessége a
magyarban. In C. Pléh & Á. Lukács (Eds.), A
magyar morfológia
pszicholingvisztikája (pp. 77–94). Osiris.
Lukács, Á., Babarczy, A., & Gábor, B. (2012). Early
comprehension of agent-patient relations and the transitive construction in
Hungarian. In G. Rundblad, A. Tytus, O. Knapton, & C. Tang (Eds.), Selected
papers of the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics
Conference (July 10–12). CLA.
Lukács, Á., & Pléh, C. (1999). Hungarian
cross-modal priming and treatment of nonsense words supports the dual process hypothesis. Commentary on Harald
Clahsen’s Rules of Language. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 22(6), 1030–1031.
Lukács, Á., & Kas, B. (2024). KOBAK
— Komplex Beszélt Anyanyelvi Képességteszt. HUN-REN Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont.
Lukács, Á., Racsmány, M., & Pléh, C. (2001). Vocabulary
and morphological patterns in Hungarian children with Williams syndrome: A preliminary
report. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 48(1–3), 243–269.
Lukács, Á., & Szamarasz, V. (2014). Téri
nyelv. In C. Pléh & Á. Lukács (Eds.), Pszicholingvisztika
1–2. Magyar pszicholingvisztikai
kézikönyv (pp. 877–919). Akadémiai Kiadó.
Lukács, Á., Gábor, B., Kemény, F., & Babarczy, A. (2014). A
nyelvtani kategóriák és szabályok elsajátítása. In C. Pléh & Á. Lukács (Eds.), Pszicholingvisztika
1–2. Magyar pszicholingvisztikai
kézikönyv (pp. 483–521). Akadémiai Kiadó.
Lukács, Á., Győri, M., & Rózsa, S. (2012). A
TROG pszichometriai jellemzőinek magyar vizsgálata, a normák
kialakítása. In D. V. M. Bishop, TROG
— Test for Reception of
Grammar (pp. 47–86). OS Hungary Tesztfejlesztő Kft.
(2013). TROG-H:
Új sztenderdizált módszer a nyelvtani megértés fejlődésének
vizsgálatára. Gyógypedagógiai
Szemle, 2013(1), 1–23.
Lukács, Á., Kas, B., & Leonard, L. B. (2013). Case
marking in Hungarian children with specific language impairment. First
Language, 33(4), 331–353.
Lukács, Á., Leonard, L. B., Kas, B., & Pléh, C. (2009). The
use of tense and agreement by Hungarian-speaking children with language
impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 52(1), 1–20.
Lukács, Á., Leonard, L. B., & Kas, B. (2010). The
use of noun morphology by children with language impairment: The case of
Hungarian. International Journal of Language & Communication
Disorders, 45(2), 145–161.
Lukács, Á., Pléh, C., & Racsmány, M. (2007). Spatial
language in Williams syndrome: Evidence for a special interaction? Journal of Child
Language, 34(2), 311–343.
MacWhinney, B. (1975a). Hungarian
language acquisition as an exemplification of a general model of grammatical
development (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
(1975b). Rules,
rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children. Journal of Child
Language, 2, 65–77.
(1976). Hungarian
research on the acquisition of morphology and syntax. Journal of Child
Language, 3, 397–410.
(1978). The
acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 174.
(1985). Hungarian
language acquisition as an exemplification of general rules of language
acquisition. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The
crosslinguistic study of language
acquisition (pp. 677–747). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1985). The
Child Language Data Exchange System. Journal of Child
Language, 12, 271–295.
Onea, E., & Beaver, D. (2009). Hungarian
focus is not exhausted. Semantics and Linguistic
Theory, 19, 342–359.
Pajkossy, P., Lukács, Á., & Kas, B. (2024). A
KOBAK reliabilitásának és validitásának vizsgálata. In Lukács, Á., & Kas, B. (Eds.), KOBAK
— Komplex Beszélt Anyanyelvi
Képességteszt (pp. 121–142). HUN-REN Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont.
Pléh, C. (1992). Verbal
prefixes in Hungarian children. In I. Kenesei & C. Pléh (Eds.), Approaches
to
Hungarian (Vol. IV, pp. 269–281). JATE.
(2000). A
magyar morfológia pszicholingvisztikai aspektusai. In F. Kiefer (Ed.), Strukturális
magyar nyelvtan 3:
Morfológia (pp. 951–1020). Akadémiai Kiadó.
Pléh, C., & Lukács, Á. (2002). A
szabályok és a kettős disszociációs elv a nyelv agyi
reprezentációjában. In E. Sz. Vizi, F. Altrichter, K. Nyíri, & C. Pléh (Eds.), Agy
és
tudat (pp. 187–205). BIP.
Pléh, C., Lukács, Á., & Racsmány, M. (2003). Morphological
patterns in Hungarian children with Williams syndrome and the rule debates. Brain and
Language, 86, 377–383.
Pléh, C., Ackerman, F., & Komlósy, A. (1989). On
the psycholinguistics of preverbal modifiers in Hungarian: Adult intuitions and children’s treatment of
modifiers. Folia
Linguistica, 23, 181–213.
Pléh, C., Ackermann, F., & Komlósy, A. (1995). Az igemódosítók pszicholingvisztikájáról [On the
psycholinguistics of verbal
modifiers]. ÁNyT XVIII, 165–189. Folia
Linguistica, 23, 181–213.
Pléh, C., Palotás, G., & Lőrik, J. (2002). Nyelvfejlődési szűrővizsgálat [Language development
screening test]. Akadémiai Kiadó.
Pléh, C., Vinkler, Z., & Kálmán, L. (1997). Early
morphology of spatial expressions in Hungarian children: A CHILDES study. Acta
Linguistica
Hungarica, 44, 249–260.
Réger, Z. (1975). Közös törvényszerűségek az anyanyelv-elsajátítás és a gyermekkori idegennyelv-elsajátítás
folyamatában [Common principles in first and foreign language
acquisition in children]. Magyar
Nyelvőr, 103, 344–350.
Savickienė, I. (1998). The
acquisition of diminutives in Lithuanian. In S. Gillis (Ed.), Studies
in the acquisition of number and diminutive
marking (pp. 115–135). Universiteit Antwerpen.
Savickienė, I., Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2009). Acquisition
of gender agreement in Lithuanian: Exploring the effect of diminutive usage in an elicited production
task. Journal of Child
Language, 36(2), 477–494.
Serény, A., Simon, E. & Babarczy, A. (2010). Automatic
acquisition of Hungarian subcategorization frames. LREC, Methods for the Automatic
Acquisition of Language Resources and their Evaluation
Methods, 13.
Ševa, N., Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., Mironova, N., Pershukova, A., & Fedorova, O. (2007). Cross-linguistic
evidence for the diminutive advantage: Gender agreement in Russian and Serbian
children. Journal of Child
Language, 34(1), 111–131.
Sinha, C., Thorseng, L. A., Hayashi, M., & Plunkett, K. (1994). Comparative
spatial semantics and language acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and
Japanese. Journal of
Semantics, 11(4), 253–287.
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (1985). The
crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tomasello, M. (2000a). Do
young children have adult syntactic
competence? Cognition, 74(3), 209–253.
(2000b). The
item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 4(4), 156–163.
