Cover not available

In:Syntactic Priming in Language Acquisition: Representations, mechanisms and applications
Edited by Katherine Messenger
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 31] 2022
► pp. 57–82

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
How does syntactic priming experience support language development?

 | University of Warwick
 | University of Edinburgh
 | University of Manchester
 | University of Edinburgh
Published online: 29 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.31.04mes
Abstract
Syntactic priming effects are argued to reflect the mechanisms that underlie language acquisition. This chapter explores the predictions of key models for such learning via syntactic priming and discusses the extent to which behavioural evidence is consistent with these predictions. Specifically, the chapter examines whether the timecourse of priming effects in research with children reflects lasting effects of syntactic experiences, and what between-group and between-individual variation in priming effects, predicted by the error-based nature of the learning mechanism, might be expected. The chapter also considers whether learning via priming might be located in comprehension and – or production processes. The chapter finishes by making recommendations for how future research may build on existing findings to further test these models, including discussing methodological implications.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntactic priming as implicit learning
  • 3.The timecourse of syntactic priming effects in children
  • 4.Between-group differences in the magnitude of priming
  • 5.Between-individual variation in syntactic priming
  • 6.The locus of implicit learning
  • 7.Methodological issues
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (77)
References
Allen, M. L., Haywood, S., Rajendran, G., & Branigan, H. (2011). Evidence for syntactic alignment in children with autism. Developmental Science, 14(3), 540–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S., Haman, E., Jensen de López, K., Smoczynska, M., Yatsushiro, K., Szczerbinski, M., … van der Lely, H. (2016). A large-scale cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of passive. Language Acquisition, 23(1), 27–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bencini, G. M. L., & Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 97–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Jones, M. (2005). A blue cat or a cat that is blue? Evidence for abstract syntax in young children’s noun phrases. In A. Brugos, M. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: The proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 109–121). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & Messenger, K. (2016). Consistent and cumulative effects of syntactic experience in children’s sentence production: Evidence for error-based implicit learning. Cognition, 157, 250–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). Structural priming and the representation of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buckle, L., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. L. (2017). The effects of animacy and syntax on priming: A developmental study. Frontiers in Psychology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6/5, 259–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394–20120394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K., Moloi, F., & Machobane, M. (2010). 3-Year-olds’ comprehension, production, and generalization of Sesotho passives. Cognition, 115(2), 238–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fazekas, J., Jessop, A., Pine, J., & Rowland, C. (2020). Do children learn from their prediction mistakes? A registered report evaluating error-based theories of language acquisition. Royal Society Open Science, 7(11), 180877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foltz, A., Knopf, K., Jonas, K., Jaecks, P., & Stenneken, P. (2020). Evidence for robust abstract syntactic representations in production before age three. First Language, 41(1), 3–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foltz, A., Thiele, K., Kahsnitz, D., & Stenneken, P. (2015). Children’s syntactic-priming magnitude: Lexical factors and participant characteristics. Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 932–945. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gambi, C., Pickering, M. J., & Rabagliati, H. (2016). Beyond associations: Sensitivity to structure in pre-schoolers’ linguistic predictions. Cognition, 157, 340–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., & Shimpi, P. M. (2016). Structural priming in Spanish as evidence of implicit learning. Journal of Child Language, 43(1), 207–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., Shimpi, P. M., Waterfall, H. R., & Huttenlocher, J. (2009). Priming a perspective in Spanish monolingual children: The use of syntactic alternatives. Journal of Child Language, 36(2), 269–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garraffa, M., Coco, M. I., & Branigan, H. P. (2015). Effects of immediate and cumulative syntactic experience in language impairment: Evidence from priming of subject relatives in children with SLI. Language Learning and Development, 11(1), 18–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17(8), 684–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hesketh, A., Serratrice, L., & Ashworth, R. (2016). Encouraging use of subordination in children’s narratives: A classroom-based priming study. Language Learning and Development, 12(4), 413–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopman, E. W. M., & MacDonald, M. C. (2018). Production practice during language learning improves comprehension. Psychological Science. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, D.-B. (2014a). Mandarin-speaking three-year-olds’ demonstration of productive knowledge of syntax: evidence from syntactic productivity and structural priming with the SVO-ba alternation. Journal of Child Language, 41(5), 1115–1146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014b). Structural priming as learning: Evidence from Mandarin-learning 5-year-olds. Language Acquisition, 21(2), 156–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Children’s adaption to input change using an abstract syntactic representation: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin-speaking preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, H. J., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2014). Sequence-specific procedural learning deficits in children with specific language impairment. Developmental Science, 17(3), 352–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurtado, I., & Montrul, S. (2021). Priming dative clitics in spoken Spanish as a second and heritage language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(4), 729–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(2), 182–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61(4), 343–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibbotson, P., Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2010). The role of pronoun frames in early comprehension of transitive constructions in English. Language Learning and Development, 7(1), 24–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janciauskas, M., & Chang, F. (2018). Input and age-dependent variation in second language learning: A connectionist account. Cognitive Science, 42(S2), 519–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 925–937. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 381–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012a). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 393–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krok, W. C., & Leonard, L. B. (2018). Verb variability and morphosyntactic priming with typically developing 2- and 3-year-olds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(12), 2996–3009. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutta, T. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2012). Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming. Acta Psychologica, 141(3), 408–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speech: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18(3), 193–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. (2016). Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns. Cognition, 146, 349–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malhotra, G., Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & Bednar, J. A. (2008). On the persistence of structural priming: Mechanisms of decay and influence of word-forms. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX (pp. 657–662). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–847. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Bates, E., Burkardt, A., & Good, A. B. (1991). Functional constraints of the acquisition of the passive: Toward a model of the competence to perform. First Language, 11(31), 65–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K. (2021). The persistence of priming: Exploring long-lasting syntactic priming effects in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 45(6), e13005. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives. Cognition, 121(2), 268–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Is children’s acquisition of the passive a staged process? Evidence from six-and nine-year-olds’ production of passives. Journal of Child Language, 39(5), 991–1016. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 568–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K., & Fisher, C. (2018). Mistakes weren’t made: Three-year-olds’ comprehension of novel-verb passives provides evidence for early abstract syntax. Cognition, 178, 118–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, M., & Rowland, C. F. (2018). Aligning developmental and processing accounts of implicit and statistical learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(3), 555–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabagliati, H., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2016). Learning to predict or predicting to learn? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 94–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissman, L., Legendre, G., & Landau, B. (2013). Abstract morphosyntax in two- and three-year-old children: Evidence from priming. Language Learning and Development, 9(3), 278–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6(5), 557–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 27–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Hesketh, A., & Ashworth, R. (2015). The use of reported speech in children’s narratives: A priming study. First Language, 35(1), 68–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J., & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1334–1346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skarabela, B., & Serratrice, L. (2009). ‘The doctor’s mother’ or ‘the mother of the doctor’? Syntactic priming of possessive noun phrases in English preschoolers. In Online supplement of the proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 33), Boston University, Boston, MA, 31 October– 2 November 2008.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 188–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, E. A., & Rommetveit, R. (1967). The acquisition of sentence voice and reversibility. Child Development, 38(3), 649–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., & Waterfall, H. (2006). Effects of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 164–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., & Waterfall, H. (2012). Beyond syntactic priming: Evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures. Journal of Child Language, 39(2), 258–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Gámez, P. B., Gómez, L. E., Bowers, E., & Shimpi, P. M. (2010). Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 1047–1064. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Novak, G. (1973). Modeling, imitation training, and the acquisition of sentence phrases. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 16(2), 332–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, F. J., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Christakis, D. A., Xu, D., Gray, S., & Yapanel, U. (2009). Teaching by listening: The importance of adult-child conversations to language development. Pediatrics, 124(1), 342–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Buckle, Leone, Holly P. Branigan, Laura Lindsay & Katherine Messenger
2025. Now You See Me, Now You don’t: Children Learn Grammatical Choices During Online Socially Contingent Video and Audio Interactions. Language Learning and Development 21:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Havron, Naomi & Chiara Gambi
2025. Syntactic Adaptation: A Robust Phenomena with Open Questions. Languages 10:7 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Tafuri, Michelle & Katherine Messenger
2025. Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language. Journal of Child Language 52:5 ► pp. 1129 ff. DOI logo
Donnelly, Seamus, Caroline Rowland, Franklin Chang & Evan Kidd
2024. A Comprehensive Examination of Prediction‐Based Error as a Mechanism for Syntactic Development: Evidence From Syntactic Priming. Cognitive Science 48:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue