Cover not available

In:Syntactic Priming in Language Acquisition: Representations, mechanisms and applications
Edited by Katherine Messenger
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 31] 2022
► pp. 35–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Beyond the English passive

What we can learn from syntactic priming about L1 acquisition by exploring other structures and languages

 | University of Graz
Published online: 29 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.31.03fol
Abstract
Research on syntactic priming in typically-developing monolingual children has focused on when abstract syntactic representations first emerge and on which mechanisms can explain syntactic priming effects in acquisition. Much of this work has focused on the English passive (but also dative structures). In this chapter, I explore how syntactic priming data can provide more fine-grained information about children’s syntactic representations, what we can learn about the role and representation of interfaces, and how syntactic priming can be used to systematically explore frequency effects in L1 acquisition. In each case, I emphasize how research with different structures and languages can make important contributions in these areas.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The nature of abstract syntactic representations
  • Interfaces
  • Input frequency effects in first language acquisition
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (125)
References
Abbot-Smith, K., & Behrens, H. (2006). How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science 30(6), 995–1026. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcock, K. J., Rimba, K., & Newton, C. R. (2012). Early production of the passive in two Eastern Bantu languages. First Language, 32(4), 459–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, S. E., & Crago, M. B. (1996). Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language, 23(1), 129–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. (2019). Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, S. C. (1983). Tone and morpheme rules in Bamileke-Ngyemboon (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2014). The development of Japanese passive syntax as indexed by structural priming in comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 60–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, D., & Wells, G. (1983). Characteristics of adult speech which predict children’s language development. Journal of Child Language, 10(1), 65–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bencini, G. M., & Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 97–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Colleman, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2014). The “sense boost” to dative priming: Evidence for sense-specific verb-structure links. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 113–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 931–949.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127(3), 287–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31(2), 163–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104(3), 437–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. (2007). Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & Messenger, K. (2016). Consistent and cumulative effects of syntactic experience in children’s sentence production: Evidence for error-based implicit learning. Cognition, 157, 250–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult-child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, Article e282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buckle, L., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. L. (2017). The effects of animacy and syntax on priming: A developmental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 02246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Baumann, M., Pappert, S., & Fitz, H. (2015). Do lemmas speak German? A verb position effect in German structural priming. Cognitive Science, 39(5), 1113–1130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., & Fitz, H. (2014). Computational models of sentence production: A dual-path approach. In M. A. Goldrick, V. S. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 70–87). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(5), 259–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, B., Jia, Y., Wang, Z., Dunlap, S., & Shin, J. A. (2013). Is word-order similarity necessary for cross-linguistic structural priming? Second Language Research, 29(4), 375–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 214–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 15–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clercq, B., & Housen, A. (2017). A cross-linguistic perspective on syntactic complexity in L2 development: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 315–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2003). Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79(2): 391–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyakonova, M. (2004). Information structure development: Evidence from the acquisition of word order in Russian and English. Nordlyd, 32(1): 88–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, G., & Fenk, A. (2008). Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 43–65). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), 1–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 1011–1029. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1362–1376.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, C. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82, 259–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2012). Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 568–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foltz, A., Gaspers, J., Meyer, C., Thiele, K., Cimiano, P., & Stenneken, P. (2015). Temporal effects of alignment in text-based, task-oriented discourse. Discourse Processes, 52(8), 609–641. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foltz, A., Knopf, K., Jonas, K., Jaecks, P., & Stenneken, P. (2020). Evidence for robust abstract syntactic representations in production before age three. First Language. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foltz, A., Thiele, K., Kahsnitz, D., & Stenneken, P. (2015). Children’s syntactic-priming magnitude: Lexical factors and participant characteristics. Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 932–945. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K., & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers’ speech to children and syntactic development: Some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 423–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., & Shimpi, P. M. (2016). Structural priming in Spanish as evidence of implicit learning. Journal of Child Language, 43(1), 207–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., Shimpi, P. M., Waterfall, H. R., & Huttenlocher, J. (2009). Priming a perspective in Spanish monolingual children: The use of syntactic alternatives. Journal of Child Language, 36(2), 269–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., & Vasilyeva, M. (2015). Increasing second language learners’ production and comprehension of developmentally advanced syntactic forms. Language Learning and Development, 11(2), 128–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17(8), 684–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil, D. (2008). The acquisition of voice morphology in Jakarta Indonesian. In N. Gagarina & I. Gülzow (Eds.), The acquisition of verbs and their grammar: The effect of particular languages (pp. 201–227). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, M. L., Ferreira, V. S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2015). Syntactic priming in American Sign Language. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75(2), B27–B39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1985). Some contributions of mothers’ speech to their children’s syntactic growth. Journal of Child Language, 12(2), 367–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holst, J. H. (2014). Advances in Burushaski linguistics. BoD–Books on Demand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horgan, D. (1978). The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language, 5, 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsin, L., Legendre, G., & Omaki, A. (2013). Priming cross-linguistic interference in Spanish–English bilingual children. In S. Baiz, N. Goldman, & R. Hawks (Eds.), BUCLD 37: Proceedings of the 37th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 165–177). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hujanen, J. H. H. (1997). Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish: An eye fixation analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50(4), 841–858. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(2), 182–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jisa, H., Reilly, J., Verhoeven, L., Baruch, E., & Rosado, E. (2002). Passive voice constructions in written texts: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Written Language and Literacy, 5(2), 163–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juola, P. (1998). Measuring linguistic complexity: The morphological tier. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5(3), 206–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 925–937. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 381–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99(3), B73–B82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012a). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 393–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kline, M., & Demuth, K. (2010). Factors facilitating implicit learning: The case of the Sesotho passive. Language Acquisition, 17(4), 220–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., Housen, A., & De Clercq, B. (2019). Variation in syntactic complexity: Introduction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 161–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Miller, C. A., Grela, B., Holland, A. L., Gerber, E., & Petucci, M. (2000). Production operations contribute to the grammatical morpheme limitations of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 362–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, J. W. (2006). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23(1), 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. (2001). The worlds simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2–3), 125–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Linguistic simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress? Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K. (2021). The persistence of priming: Exploring long-lasting syntactic priming effects in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 45(6), e13005. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives. Cognition, 121, 268–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 568–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S. (2017). Structural priming is not a royal road to representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. (2008). Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 23–41). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24(2), 154–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muylle, M., Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). The role of case marking and word order in cross-linguistic structural priming in late L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 70(S2), 194–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: Resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition, 86(2), 157–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkvall, M. (2008). The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 265–285). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pasch, H. (1997). Sango. In S. G. Thomason (Ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective (pp. 209–270). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, F. (2012). Alternation-based generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a sorting task experiment. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(3), 601–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and language, 39(4), 633–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 136–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pye, C., & Quixtan Poz, P. (1988). Precocious passives (and antipassives) in Quiché Mayan. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 27, 71–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissman, L., Legendre, G., & Landau, B. (2013). Abstract morphosyntax in two-and three-year-old children: Evidence from priming. Language Learning and Development, 9(3), 278–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (2009). Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarilar, A., Matthews, D., & Küntay, A. C. (2015). Hearing relative clauses boosts relative clause usage (and referential clarity) in young Turkish language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 175–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6(5), 557–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 27–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarborough, H., & Wycoff, J. (1986). Mother, I’d still rather do it myself: Some further non-effects of ‘motherese’. Journal of Child Language, 13(2), 431–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, C. M. (1984). Adverbial connectivity in conversations of children 6–12. Journal of Child Language, 11(2), 423–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seabrooks, D. (2017). Child acquisition of Spanish clitic impersonal constructions: An empirical study on the CHILDES corpora (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J., & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3-and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1334–1346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K. (2009). Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 112(1), 175–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shosted, R. K. (2006). Correlating complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic Typology, 10(1), 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, K. (2008). Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 67–88). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 195–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsányi, B. (2004). On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve (Vol. 2, pp. 1032–1039). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamburelli, M., Sanoudaki, E., Jones, G., & Sowinska, M. (2015). Acceleration in the bilingual acquisition of phonological structure: Evidence from Polish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 713–725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (2016, December 22). Children’s acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Oxford Research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2010). Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 925–937. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 59–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1999). Input and language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 497–530). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., & Gámez, P. B. (2015). Exploring interactions between semantic and syntactic processes: The role of animacy in syntactic priming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 15–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., & Waterfall, H. (2006). Effects of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 164–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., & Waterfall, H. (2012). Beyond syntactic priming: Evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures. Journal of Child Language, 39(2), 258–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Gámez, P. B., Gómez, L. E., Bowers, E., & Shimpi, P. (2010). Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 1047–1064. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., Ironsmith, M., & Goldfein, M. (1974). Selective imitation of the passive construction through modeling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17(2), 288–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegler, J., Snedeker, J., & Wittenberg, E. (2018). Event structures drive semantic structural priming, not thematic roles: Evidence from idioms and light verbs. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2918–2949. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hurtado, Irati & Silvina Montrul
2025. Does structural priming lead to contact-induced language change?. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Tafuri, Michelle & Katherine Messenger
2025. Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language. Journal of Child Language 52:5 ► pp. 1129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue