Cover not available

In:The Acquisition of Referring Expressions: A dialogical approach
Edited by Anne Salazar-Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan and Annie Rialland
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 28] 2021
► pp. 163–199

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Explorations in the relations between reference, syntactic constructions and prosody

ORCiD logo with link | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3
ORCiD logo with link | Université de Neuchâtel
 | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3
Published online: 16 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.28.06kle
Abstract
Based on a cross-sectional corpus of 14 mother-child conversations (aged 2;2 to 2;4), this chapter explores children’s sensitivity to both formal linguistic features and discourse-pragmatic factors. We considered various issues. The first was the sensitivity of young children to discourse through a syntactic construction closely related to discourse and information structure, i.e., dislocations (see Lambrecht, 1994, for adults, and De Cat, 2007, for children). The second was the fact that the occurrence of a referring expression in a syntactic construction was due not only to discourse-pragmatic characteristics but also to the constraints imposed by the nature of certain verb frames. The third was young children’s sensitivity to discourse, examined through variation in the prosodic contours of referring expressions. Our results indicate that the children’s use of dislocation is sensitive to discourse-pragmatic contexts in a way comparable to that of the adults and that prosody varies with discourse-pragmatic characteristics. In addition, the nature of the verb frames studied was also shown to influence children’s choice of referring expressions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Dislocations and reference
    • 1.2Verb frames and reference
    • 1.3Prosody and reference
    • 1.4Aim of the study
  • 2.Method and preliminary results
    • 2.1Participants and data collection
    • 2.2Coding
      • 2.2.1Categories of referring expressions
      • 2.2.2Verb frames
      • 2.2.3Position within the referential chain
      • 2.2.4Prosody
      • 2.2.5Complementary analysis
    • 2.3Intercoder agreement and statistics
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Referring expressions, position in the referential chain, and prosody
    • 3.2Dislocations
      • 3.2.1Ratio and dislocation direction across referring expressions
      • 3.2.2Dislocation and discourse-pragmatic characteristics
      • 3.2.3Dislocation, position in the referential chain and prosody
    • 3.3Verb frames
      • 3.3.1Distribution of referring expressions in verb frames
      • 3.3.2Distribution of referring expressions according to referential-chain position
      • 3.3.3Prosody in verb frames
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Allen, S. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Formalism and functionalism working together? Exploring roles for complementary contributions in the domain of child null arguments. In R. Slabakova, S. A. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 233–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, S. E. M., Hughes, M. E., & Skarabela, B. (2015). The role of cognitive accessibility in children’s referential choice. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 123–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(02), 239–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, H., & Gut, U. (2005). The relationship between prosodic and syntactic organization in early multiword speech. Journal of Child Language, 32, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyssade, C., Delais-Roussarie, E., Doetjes, J., Marandin, J. M., & Rialland, A. (2004). Prosody and information in French. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics (pp. 477–499). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2002). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.03.). [URL] (21 November, 2011).
Chen, A. (2015). Children’s use of intonation in reference and the role of input. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 83–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–314). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, D. (2006). Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culbertson, J., & Legendre, G. (2008). Qu’en est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain? In J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (Eds.), Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française (pp. 2651–2662). Paris: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
da Silva-Genest, C., Marcos, H., Salazar Orvig, A., Caët, S., & Heurdier, J. (2021). Young children’s uses of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 81–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cat, C. (2001). Investigating the left periphery in child French: A reply to Ferdinand (1996). In M. Almgren, A. Barreña, M.-J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the IASCL (pp. 1334–1355). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). A fresh look at how young children encode new referents. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 111–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). French dislocation: Interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Weck, G., Hassan, R., Heurdier, J., Klein, J., & Salagnac, N. (2021). Activities and social settings: Their roles in the use of referring expressions. In A. Salazar Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (Eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions: A dialogical approach (pp. 261–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., Doetjes, J., & Sleeman, P. (2004). Dislocations in French. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics (pp. 501–528). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., & Feldhausen, I. (2014). Variation in prosodic boundary strength: A study on dislocated XPs in French. In N. Campbell, D. Hirst, & D. Gibbon (Eds.), Proceedings of speech prosody 2014 (pp.1052–1056). Dublin: SProSIG. [URL].
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Argument structure: grammar in use. In J. W. Du Bois, L. E. Kumpf, & W. J. Ashby (Eds.), Structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 11–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferdinand, A. (1996). The development of functional categories: The acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, J.-P. (2011). EasyAlign: An automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. Proceedings of InterSpeech, Firenze, Italy. [URL]
Graf, E., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Subject and object omission in children’s early transitive constructions: A discourse-pragmatic approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 701–727. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendricks, H. (2000). The acquisition of topic marking in L1 Chinese and L1 and L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(3), 369–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (2003). Children’s discourse, person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendricks, H. (1999). Cohesion and anaphora in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 26, 419–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendricks, H., Roland, F., & Liang, J. (1996). The marking of new information in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 23, 591–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horlacher, A.-S. (2015). La dislocation à droite revisitée: Une approche interactionniste. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jisa, H., & Kern, S. (1998). Relative clauses in French children’s narrative texts. Journal of Child Language, 25, 623–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konopczynski, G. (1991). Le langage émergent II: Aspects vocaux et mélodiques. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). De l’énoncé présyntaxique à la phrase canonique: Aspects syntaxico-prosodiques. Parole, 7/8, 263–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labelle, M., & Valois, D. (1996). The status of post-verbal subjects in French child language. Probus, 8, 53–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacheret-Dujour, A. (2003). La prosodie des circonstants en français parlé. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath (Ed.), Language Typology and Language Universals, 2 (pp. 1050–1078). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2009). Intonation du Français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (2004). The Prosogram: Semi-automatic transcription of prosody based on a tonal perception model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Nara (Japan), March 2004.
(2008). Syntaxe, prosodie et structure informationnelle: Une approche prédictive pour l’analyse de l’intonation dans le discours. Travaux de Linguistique, 56, 97–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). La prosodie des clivées. In S. Caddéo, M. N. Roubaud, M. Rouquier, & F. Sabio (Eds.), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste (pp. 127–143). Marseille: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., & Parisse, C. (2012). Constructing “basic” verbal constructions: a longitudinal study of the blossoming of constructions with six frequent verbs. In M. Bouveret & D. Legallois (Eds.), Constructions in French (pp. 127–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parisse, C. (2008). Left-dislocated subjects: A construction typical of young French-speaking children? In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, P. Larrañaga & J. Clibbens (Eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners (pp. 13–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2001). Dislocation à gauche et organisation interactionnelle. Marges Linguistiques, 2, 177–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. (1997). Slot and frame patterns in the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 123–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., & Parès, J. (2010). Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1842–1865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, A.-C. (2004). La structuration prosodique du discours en français: Une approche multidimensionnelle et expérientielle. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, D., & Balog, H. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of the developmental intonation research. Lingua, 112, 1025–1058. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L. (2012). “The spotty cow tickled the pig with a curly tail”: How do sentence position, preferred argument structure, and referential complexity affect children’s and adults’ choice of referring expression? Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 691–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Ibbotson, P., Freudenthal, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Productivity of noun slots in verb frames. Cognitive Science, 39(6), 1369–1395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, B., Peppé, S., & Goulandris, N. (2004). Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language, 31, 749–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

da Silva-Genest, Christine, Haydée Marcos, Anne Salazar Orvig, Stéphanie Caët & Julien Heurdier
2021. Young children’s uses of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Hassan, Rouba, Geneviève de Weck, Stefano Rezzonico, Anne Salazar Orvig & Elise Vinel
2021. Variations in adult use of referring expressions during storytelling in different interactional settings. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Salazar Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021. The acquisition of referring expressions: From formal factors to communicative experience. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
2021. Chapter 11. The acquisition of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Salazar Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
2021. Chapter 1. A dialogical approach to the acquisition and usage of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], DOI logo
Yamaguchi, Naomi, Anne Salazar Orvig, Marine Le Mené, Stéphanie Caët & Annie Rialland
2021. Filler syllables as precursors of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue