Cover not available

In:The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
Edited by Alexandru Mardale and Silvina Montrul
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 26] 2020
► pp. 133–160

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
The distribution of Differential Object Marking in L1 and L2 River Plate Spanish

 | Wake Forest University
 | Indiana University
Published online: 18 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.26.05jud
Abstract
This study examines Differential Object Marking (DOM) in native and largely naturalistic near-native L2 River Plate Spanish speakers (L1 Persian). Persian and Spanish mark certain direct objects (DO). Most syntactic descriptions of Spanish claim [+animate,+specific] DOs are marked while in Persian, all specific DOs are marked regardless of animacy. Native (n = 23) and L2 speakers (n = 8) completed a Grammaticality Judgment Task with correction (n = 48 experimental tokens) manipulating animacy and specificity with marked and unmarked DOs. Individual level results show divergence from conventional syntactic descriptions, and some native speakers also produced corrected sentences traditionally considered ungrammatical in Spanish (e.g. DOM with inanimate DOs). Since the L2 speakers did not indiscriminately accept all specific marked DOs, L1 transfer alone cannot explain their results.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The syntax of Spanish and Persian DOM
  • Dialectal differences in Spanish DOM
    • Acquisition task
  • Previous literature
  • Methodology
    • Research questions and predictions
    • Participants
    • Experimental task
  • Results
    • Analysis 1: Acceptability rates
    • Analysis 2: Production via accepted/corrected items
    • Analysis 3: Individual data
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balasch, S. (2011). Factors determining Spanish Differential Object Marking within its domain of variation. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp.113–124). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bleam, T. (2000). Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bossong, G. (1983/1984). Animacy and markedness in Universal Grammar. Glossologia, 2–3, 7–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bautista-Maldonado, S., & Montrul, S. (2019). An experimental investigation of Differential Object Marking in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context, 16(1), 22-50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowles, M., & Montrul, S. (2009). Instructed L2 acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. In R. P. Leow, H. Campos, & D. Lardiere (Eds.), Little words. Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and acquisition (pp. 199–210). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1970). More on definiteness markers: Interrogatives in Persian. Linguistic Inquiry, 1(3), 359–363.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bullock, B., & Toribio, J. (2009). Reconsidering Dominican Spanish: Data from the rural Cibao. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 7(2), 49–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). El avance diacrónico de la marcación prepositiva en objetos directos inanimados. In A. Bernabé, Alberto, J. A. Berenguer, M. Cantarero & J. C. de Torres (Eds.), Presente y futuro de la lingüística en España (Vol. II, pp. 146–154). Madrid: SEL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, D. (1997). El parámetro discursivo en la expresión del objeto directo lexical: Español madrileño vs. español porteño. Signo y Seña, 7, 305–354.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Echenique Eliozondo, T. (1981). El Sistema referencial en español antiguo: Leísmo, laísmo, loísmo. Revista de Filología Española, 61(1), 113–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2013). Differential Object Marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2, 1–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Ramírez, S. (1986 [1951]). Gramática española. 4. El verbo y la oración. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ganjavi, S. (2007). Direct objects in Persian (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Fafulas, S., & Kanwit, M. (2013). Acquiring geographically-variable norms of use: The case of the present perfect in Mexico and Spain. In C. Howe, M. Lubbers, & S. Blackwell (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 205–220). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2012). The acquisition of interpretable features in L2 Spanish: Personal a. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 701–720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Voicing language dominance: Acquiring Spanish by British English/Spanish bilingual children. In K. Potowski & J. Rothman (Eds.), Bilingual youth (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Pires, A., & Nediger, W. (2017). Delay in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Spanish monolingual and bilingual teenagers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G. (2003). The interaction of animacy, specificity, and definiteness in Spanish. In K. von Heusinger & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages (pp. 67–101). Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hummel, K. (2014). Introducing second language acquisition: Perspectives and practices. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karimi, S. (1999). Specificity effect: Evidence from Persian. Linguistic Review, 16, 125–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Object positions, specificity and scrambling. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word order and scramblin, (pp. 91–125). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp. 178–192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Goodluck, & H. Zobl (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 107–140). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Specificity in clitic doubling and in Differential Object Marking. Probus, 20, 33–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, D., & Rothman, J. (2013). Generative approaches and the competing systems hypothesis: Formal acquisition to pedagogical application. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (pp. 63–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, C. (2011). Null and overt subjects in a variable system: The case of Dominican Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2013). Differential Object Marking in Argentine Spanish. An experimental study. In L. Colantoni & C. Rodríguez Louro (Eds.), The handbook of Argentine Spanish (pp. 207–228). Frankfurt: Vervuert Iberoamericana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Gürel, A. (2015). The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish by Turkish speakers. In T. Judy & S. Perpiñán (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 281–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sanchez-Walker, N. (2013). Differential Object Marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 109–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2009). Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 211–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, I., & Uriagereka, J. (2018). A look at microvariation in theoretical syntax: Dialectal distance and data assessment. Paper presented at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Austin, TX, October.
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L. (1979). Estudios de gramática generativa del Español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, J. (1997). Topics in Persian. Lingua, 102(2-3), 133-167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2008). The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Probus, 20, 111–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Theoretical linguistics meets pedagogical practice: Pronominal subject use in Spanish as a second language (L2) as an example. Hispania, 93(1), 52–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2007). On L2 Clustering and Resetting the Null Subject Parameter in L2 Spanish: Implications and Observations. Hispania, 90(2), 328–341.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The syntax of objects. Agree and Differential Object Marking. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonmaker-Gates, E. (2018). Dialect comprehension and identification in L2 Spanish: Familiarity and type of exposure. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 11(1), 193–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shokouhi, H., & Kipka, P. (2003). A discursive study of Persian râ. Lingua, 113, 953–966. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toribio, A. J. (2000). Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua, 110(5), 315–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zdrojewski, P. (2008). ¿Por quién doblan los clíticos? Restricciones morfosintácticas de la duplicación pronominal en el español del Río de la Plata (Unpublished MA thesis). Universidad Nacional del Comahue.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Spanish DOM as a case of lacking case (Unpublished manuscript). Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento / Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Puig-Mayenco, Eloi & Tiffany Judy
2025. Unveiling DOM optionality in Central Catalan. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 11:4 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue