Cover not available

In:Semantics in Language Acquisition
Edited by Kristen Syrett and Sudha Arunachalam
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 24] 2018
► pp. 95–121

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
On the acquisition of event culmination

 | University of Groningen
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.24.05hou
Abstract
There is quite a high rate of acceptance of telic-perfective predicates as descriptions of non-culminating events in children learning Germanic and Romance languages. What causes children, much more so than adults, to accept non-culminating interpretations of telic-perfective sentences? In this review, I discuss learners’ difficulties’ in each of three grammatical dimensions that contribute to event culmination: the notion of ‘result’ as encoded in the lexical semantics of verbs, telicity of verb phrases telicity, and perfectivity of tense-aspect morphology. I conclude that telicity and perfectivity do not cause the non-culmination acceptance patterns. Instead, the learnability challenge for event culmination lies in the acquisition of verb meanings. I sketch several new angles for further research, including the role of agentivity of the subject.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The grammatical dimensions of event culmination
  • 3.Non-culmination patterns and the acquisition of the lexical meaning of verbs
  • 4.Non-culmination patterns and the acquisition of telicity
  • 5.Non-culmination patterns and the acquisition of perfectivity
  • 6.Conclusions and new developments in the acquisition of event culmination
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (68)
References
Atlas, J. D., Levinson, S. C. (1981). It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: Radical pragmatics. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 1–61). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borik, O. (2006). Aspect and reference time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisson, C. (1994). The licensing of unexpressed objects in English. In K. Beals, J. Denton, R. Knippen, L. Melnar, H. Suzuki, & E. Zeinfeld (Eds.), Papers from the 30th Annual Regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 90–102). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delidaki, S. (2006). The acquisition of tense and aspect in child Greek (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Reading.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The primitives of temporal relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 157–186). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demirdache, H., & Martin, F. (2015). Agent control over non-culminating events. In E. Barrajón López, J. L. Cifuentes Honrubia & S. Rodríguez Rosique (Eds.), Verb classes and aspect (pp. 185–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, H. (2008). Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect (pp. 217–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagarina, N. (2008). Stanovlenie Grammatičeskich Kategorij Russkogo Glagola v Detskoj Reči [Entstehung der grammatischen Kategorien des russischen Verbs im Erstspracherwerb]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García del Real, I. (2015). The acquisition of tense and aspect in Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García del Real, I., & Ezeizabarrena, M. (2011). Comprehension of grammatical and lexical aspect in early Spanish and Basque. In S. Ferré, P. Prévost, L. Tuller, & R. Zebib (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the Romance Turn IV: Workshop on the acquisition of Romance languages (pp. 82–103). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1978). On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988–998.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. (1991). Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18, 115–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacohen, A. (2010). On the acquisition of Hebrew compositional telicity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Doctoral dissertation notice in Language Acquisition , 18, 84–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harnish, R. M. (1976). Logical form and implicature. In T. G. Bever, J. J. Katz, & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), An integrated theory of linguistic ability (pp. 313–391). New York, NY: Crowell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J., Kennedy, C., & Levin, B. (1999). Scale structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. In T. Matthews & D. Strolovitch (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, (pp. 127–144). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodgson, M. (2001). The acquisition of Spanish reflexive se in transitive verb-argument structures and singularity. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. H-J. Do (Eds.), BUCLD 26: Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 302–313). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). The acquisition of Spanish perfective aspect: a study on children’s production and comprehension. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 29, 2003, 105–117.
van Hout, A. (1996). Event semantics of verb frame alternations: A case study of Dutch and its acquisition (Doctoral dissertation). University of Tilburg. Published in 1998 by Garland Publishing, New York in Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). On the role of direct objects and particles in learning telicity in Dutch and English. A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, & H., Littlefield (Eds.), BUCLD 22: Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 397–408). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, A., & Hollebrandse, B. 2001. On the acquisition of the aspects in Italian. J.-Y. Kim and A. Werle (Eds) The proceedings of SULA, The semantics of under-represented Languages in the Americas. UMOP 25, 111–120. GLSA, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, A. (2005). Imperfect imperfectives: On the acquisition of aspect in Polish. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual inquiries (pp. 317–343). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Acquisition of aspectual meanings in a language with and a language without morphological aspect. In H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake, & I. Woo (Eds.), Supplemental Proceedings of the 31st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. <[URL]>
(2008a). Acquiring telicity cross-linguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 255–278). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Acquisition of perfective and imperfective aspect in Dutch, Italian and Polish. Lingua, 118, 1740–1765.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The acquisition of aspect. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp. 587–610). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, A., Arche, M., Demirdache, H., García del Real, I., García Sanz, A., Gavarró, A., Gomez Marzo, L., Hommes, S., Kazanina, N., Liu, J., Lungu, O., Martin, F., & Strangmann, I. M. (2017). Agent control and the acquisition of event culmination in Basque, Dutch, English, Spanish and Mandarin. In M. LaMendola & J. Scott (Eds.), BUCLD 41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 323–332). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikegami, Y. (1985). Activity – accomplishment – achievement – a language that can’t say ‘I burned it, but it didn’t burn’ and one that can. In A. Makkai & A. K. Melby (Eds.), Linguistics and philosophy: Essays in honor of Rulon S. Wells (pp. 265–304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeschull, L. (2007). The pragmatics of telicity and what children make of it. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (pp. 180–187). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kazanina, N., & Phillips, C. (2007). A developmental perspective on the imperfective paradox. Cognition, 105, 65–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., & Levin, B. (2008). Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In L. McNally & C. Kennedy (Eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse (pp. 156–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konstantzou, K. (2014). Acquisition of tense and aspect: Evidence from production and comprehension tasks (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Athens.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expressions (pg. 75–115). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakusta, L., & DiFabrizio, S. (2016). And, the winner is… A visual preference for endpoints over starting points in infants’ motion event representations. Infancy, 22, 323–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landman, F. (1992). The progressive. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, P., & Bowerman, M. (1998). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in Chinese. First Language, 18, 311–350.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuo, A. (2009). Young children’s understanding of ongoing vs. completion in imperfective and perfective participle. Linguistics, 47, 743–757.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiela, D. (2007). Development of telicity interpretation: Sensitivity to verb-type and determiner-type (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiela, D., Schmitt, C., & Casby, M. W. (2014). Interpretation of verb phrase telicity: Sensitivity to verb type and determiner type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 865–875.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishida, C. (1994). Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker. Linguistics, 32, 425–458.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pederson, E. (1998). Event realization in Tamil. In P. Brown & M. Bowerman (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 331–355). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penner, Z., Schulz, P., & Wyman, K. (2003). Learning the meaning of verbs: What distinguishes language-impaired from normally developing children? Linguistics, 41, 289–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, P. (2018). Telicity in typical and impaired acquisition. In K. Syrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in Language Acquisition (pp. 30–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, P., & Penner, Z. (2002). How you can eat the apple and have it too: Evidence from the acquisition of telicity in German. In J. Costa & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition Conference. Lisbon: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, Lisboa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, P., & Wittek, A. (2003). Opening doors and sweeping floors: What children with Specific Language Impairment know about telic and atelic verbs. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Colin (Eds.), BUCLD 27: Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 727–738). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, P., Wymann, K., & Penner, Z. (2001). The early acquisition of verb meaning in German by normally developing and language impaired children. Brain and Language, 77, 407–418.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singh, M. (1994). Perfectivity, definiteness, and specificity: A classification of verbal predicates in Hindi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soh, H. L., & Kuo, J. Y. (2005). Perfective aspect and accomplishment situations in Mandarin Chinese. In H. J. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, & A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect (pp. 199–216). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoll, S. (1998). Acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language, 18, 351–377.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strangmann, I. (2015). The effect of agents and subject causes on the interpretation of non-culminating endstates (MA thesis). University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event integration. In L. A. Sutton, C. Johnson, & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on the grammar of event structure (pp. 480–519). Available online: <[URL] >
Tomasello, M., & Merriman, W. E. (1995). Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, H. (1972). On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, (1993). A theory of aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinnitskaya, I., & Wexler, K. (2001). The role of pragmatics in the development of Russian aspect. First Language, 21, 143–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, L. (2002). Children’s comprehension of completion entailments in the absence of agency cues. Journal of Child Language, 29, 109–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). First language acquisition. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 458–480). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, L., & Lakusta, L. (2009). Using language to navigate the infant mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 177–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., & Lyytinen, P. (1991). A cross-linguistic perspective on the development of temporal systems. Journal of Child Language, 18, 67–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittek, A. (2002). Learning the meaning of change of state verbs: A case study of German child language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

He, Angela Xiaoxue & Sudha Arunachalam
2024. Event end-state encoding in 13-month-olds—completed and non-completed events are different. Language and Cognition 16:3 ► pp. 690 ff. DOI logo
Ji, Yue & Anna Papafragou
2020. Midpoints, endpoints and the cognitive structure of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:10 ► pp. 1465 ff. DOI logo
Martin, Fabienne, Hamida Demirdache, Isabel García del Real, Angeliek van Hout & Nina Kazanina
2020. Children’s non-adultlike interpretations of telic predicates across languages. Linguistics 58:5 ► pp. 1447 ff. DOI logo
Horvath, Sabrina, Leslie Rescorla & Sudha Arunachalam
2018. Semantic features of early verb vocabularies. In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 24], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Schulz, Petra
2018. Telicity in typical and impaired acquisition. In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 24], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue