Cover not available

In:Semantics in Language Acquisition
Edited by Kristen Syrett and Sudha Arunachalam
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 24] 2018
► pp. 67–92

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
Semantic features of early verb vocabularies

 | Boston University
 | Bryn Mawr College
 | Boston University
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.24.04hor
Abstract
Much research has asked why verbs are difficult to acquire, and how toddlers nevertheless acquire them. Still, we know little about what kinds of verb meanings are easy or difficult to acquire. We revisit Rescorla and colleagues’ data on vocabulary knowledge in toddlers acquiring English, Italian, Greek, Korean, and Portuguese measured using the Language Development Survey. We coded the survey’s verbs for several semantic features to determine which features predict appearance in toddlers’ vocabularies. For English, manner and result verbs were equally well known across samples, but verbs labeling durative events and events with fewer event participants were more likely to be known than those labeling punctual events and events involving more participants. Similar trends held in the other languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Our dataset: Data from the language development survey (Rescorla, 1989)
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Verbs
    • 2.3Semantic dimensions
      • 2.3.1Manner vs. result
      • 2.3.2Durative vs. punctual
      • 2.3.3Number of obligatory event participants
    • 2.4Covariates
      • 2.4.1Frequency
      • 2.4.2Imageability
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Manner vs. result
      • 3.1.1English
      • 3.1.2Other languages
    • 3.2Durative vs. punctual
      • 3.2.1English
      • 3.2.2Other languages
    • 3.3Number of obligatory event participants
      • 3.3.1English
      • 3.3.2Other languages
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Summary of results
    • 4.2Limitations and future directions
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
References (78)
References
Abbot-Smith, K., Imai, M., Durrant, S., & Nurmsoo, E. (2017). The role of timing and prototypical causality on how preschoolers fast-map novel verb meanings. First Language, 37(2), 186–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, S., Ozyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antinucci, F., & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3, 167–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language, 27, 521–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375–42; 2011.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavers, J., & Koontz-Garboden, A. (2012). Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 331–369.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrend, D. A. (1990). The development of verb concepts: Children’s use of verbs to label familiar and novel events. Child Development, 61, 681–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, H. (1993). Temporal reference in German child language: Form and function of early verb use (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2013). The acquisition of abstract words by young infants. Cognition, 127, 391–397.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. I., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Cote, L. R., Maital, S., Painter, K., Park, S-Y., Pascual, L., Pêcheux, M. G., Ruel, J., Venuti, P., & Vyt, A. (2004). Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development, 75, 1115–1139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 319–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, Y., & Arunachalam, S. (2013). Learning manner and path verbs from the serial verb construction in Korean. In S. Baiz, N. Goldman, & R. Hawkes (Eds.), BUCLD 37: Proceedings of the 37th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 62–73). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1995). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V., Carpenter, K. L., & Deutsch, W. (1995). Reference states and reversals: Undoing actions with verbs. Journal of Child Language, 22, 633–662.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortese, M. J., & Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 384–387.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 125–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Goodman, J. C. (2005). Commonality and individual difference in vocabulary growth. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 41–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Lemos, C. (1981). Interactional processes in the child’s construction of languages. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), The child’s construction of language (pp. 57–76). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1970). The grammar of hitting and breaking. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 120–133). Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children’s interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 41–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forbes, J. N., & Farrar, M. J. (1995). Learning to represent word meaning: What initial training events reveal about children’s developing action verb concepts. Cognitive Development, 10, 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forbes, J. N., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (1997). Representational change in young children’s understanding of familiar verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 24, 389–406.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1978). On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988–998.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development, Vol. 2: Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2012). Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition, 124, 85–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73, 135–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515–531.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (2000). Nouns before verbs in comprehension vs. production: The view from pragmatics. Journal of Child Language, 27, 501–520.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1986). Relations between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage: The specificity hypothesis. Child Development, 57, 1040–1053.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., & Smith, J. H. (1976). Structure of communication in early language development. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. (1991). Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition, 41, 153–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horvath, S., Rescorla, L., & Arunachalam, S. (2015). Differences in expressive verb vocabulary between typically developing and delayed language learners at two years. Paper presented at the 2015 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, Denver, CO.
(in revision). The syntactic and semantic features of two-year olds’ verb vocabularies: A comparison of typically developing children and late talkers. Journal of Child Language.
van Hout, A. (2018). On the acquisition of event culmination. In K. Syrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in Language Acquisition (pp. 95–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husband, E. M. (2011). Rescuing manner/result complementarity from certain death. Proceedings of the 47th annual Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago, IL: CLS.
Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P., & Charney, R. (1983). Emergency of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review, 90, 72–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., et al. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children. Child Development, 79, 979–1000.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. (2011). Verb classes within and across languages. Handout, Leipzig, April.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. R. (1991). Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition, 41, 123–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, & R. Marín (Eds.), Subatomic semantics of event predicates (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, P. (2001). The CHILDES Parental Corpus. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Li, P., & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, W., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., McDonough, C., & Tardif, T. (2009). Imageability predicts the age of acquisition of verbs in Chinese children. Journal of Child Language, 36, 405–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1990). Are actions to verbs as objects are to nouns? On the differential semantic bases of form, class, category. Linguistics, 28, 1351–1380.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R., & Kako, E. T. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax. Child Development, 64, 1665–1687.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children’s early verb use. Journal of Child Language, 25, 95–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R., Hoff, E., Vea, D., Tomasello, M., Brandt, S., Waxman, S. R., & Childers, J. B. (2009). Flexibility in early verb use: Evidence from a multiple-n diary study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 74(2), vii–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(1–2), 1–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papaeliou, C. F., & Rescorla, L. (2011). Vocabulary development in Greek children: A cross-linguistic comparison using the Language Development Survey. Journal of Child Language, 38, 861–887.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Cassidy, K., & Gleitman, L. (2007). When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs. Cognition, 105, 125–165.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penner, Z., Schulz, P., & Wymann, K. (2003). Learning the meaning of verbs: What distinguishes language-impaired from normally developing children? Linguistics, 41, 289–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure (pp. 21–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. (1980). Overextension in early language development. Journal of Child Language, 7, 321–335.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). The Language Development Survey: A screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 587–599.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., & Achenbach, T. M. (2000). Use of the Language Development Survey (LDS) in a national probability sample of children 18 to 35 months old. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 733–743.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Alley, A., & Christine, J. B. (2001). Word frequencies in toddlers’ lexicons. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 598–609.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Nyame, J., & Dias, P. (2016). Vocabulary development in European Portuguese: A replication study using the Language Development Survey. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 1484–1490.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Frigerio, A., Sali, M. E., Spataro, P., & Longobardi, E. (2014). Typical and delayed lexical development in Italian. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1792–1803.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Lee, Y. M. C., Oh, K. J., & Kim, Y. A. (2013). Lexical development in Korean: Vocabulary size, lexical composition, and late talking. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 735–747.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., & Safyer, P. (2013). Lexical composition in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Child Language, 40, 47–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissman, L. (2015). Cinderella broke and broke: Object deletion and manner-result complementarity. Proceedings from the 51st Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 425–439). Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, P. (2018). Acquisition of telicity. In K. Syrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in Language Acquisition (pp. 123–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, R., Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2018). Not all subjects are agents: Transitivity and meaning in early language comprehension. In K. Syrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in Language Acquisition (pp. 153–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, 2, 1157–1256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snedeker, J., Zeitlin, M., & Crawford, J. (2013). Why are some words learned before others? Predictors of lexical production in infants and children learning English. Paper presented at the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492–504.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Gelman, S. A., & Xu, F. (1999). Putting the “noun bias” in context: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development, 70, 620–635.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study in grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waxman, S., Fu, X., Arunachalam, S., Leddon, E., Geraghty, K., & Song, H. J. (2013). Are nouns learned before verbs? Infants provide insight into a long-standing debate. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 155–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development, 83, 1382–1399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Horvath, Sabrina, Justin B. Kueser, Jaelyn Kelly & Arielle Borovsky
2022. Difference or Delay? Syntax, Semantics, and Verb Vocabulary Development in Typically Developing and Late-talking Toddlers. Language Learning and Development 18:3 ► pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Haebig, Eileen, Eva Jiménez, Christopher R Cox & Thomas T Hills
2021. Characterizing the early vocabulary profiles of preverbal and minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 25:4 ► pp. 958 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez, Eva, Eileen Haebig & Thomas T. Hills
2021. Identifying Areas of Overlap and Distinction in Early Lexical Profiles of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Late Talkers, and Typical Talkers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 51:9 ► pp. 3109 ff. DOI logo
HORVATH, Sabrina, Leslie RESCORLA & Sudha ARUNACHALAM
2019. The syntactic and semantic features of two-year-olds’ verb vocabularies: a comparison of typically developing children and late talkers. Journal of Child Language 46:3 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue