Cover not available

In:Semantics in Language Acquisition
Edited by Kristen Syrett and Sudha Arunachalam
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 24] 2018
► pp. 45–65

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
The influence of linguistic temporal organization on children’s understanding of temporal terms and concepts

 | Ohio State University
Published online: 2 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.24.03wag
Abstract
The Typological Prevalence Hypothesis argues that the cognitive biases that lead to common cross-linguistic patterns also guide language development. Two studies investigated English learning children’s understanding of temporal terms and concepts and how they might be influenced by three typologically common patterns: the use of a deictic center, the asymmetry between past and future times, and the use of temporal remoteness. Using a timeline task, five- and eight-year-old children were asked to locate events with a range of temporal expressions as well as with general event descriptions. The results provided only limited support for the TPH for the temporal domain but do demonstrate the potential for the hypothesis as a research approach.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Procedures
    • 2.4Coding
    • 2.5Results
      • 2.5.1Ability to use the timeline appropriately
      • 2.5.2Analysis of effects
    • 2.6Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Stimuli and procedures
    • 3.3Results
    • 3.4Discussion
  • 4.General discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (29)
References
Binnick, R. I. (1991). Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botne, R. (2012). Remoteness distinctions. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), 536–562.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). First language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busby Grant, J., & Suddendorf, T. (2009). Preschoolers begin to differentiate the times of events from throughout the lifespan. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 746–762.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Production of temporal terms by 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 87–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deo, A. (2012). Morphology. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), 155–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman W. J. (2002). Children’s knowledge of the future distances of daily activities and annual events. Cognition and Development, 3, 333–356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman W. J., Gardner A. G., & Zubin N. R. E. (1995). Children’s comparisons of the recency of two events from the past year. Child Development, 66, 970–983 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowerman, M. (2009). Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: The typological prevalence hypothesis. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Ozcaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language (pp. 465–480). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. (1999). Semantics, tense, and time. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maastricht, L., & Hollebrandse, B. (2011). Tense acquisition in French 5-year-olds. Groninger Abeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 51, 75–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormack, T., & Hanley, M. (2011). Children’s reasoning about the temporal order of past and future events. Cognitive Development 26, 299–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time. English translation by A. J. Pomerans. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York, NY: McMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Tare M., Nguyen S. P., & Young, T. (2010). Acquiring non-object terms: The case for time words. Journal of Cognitive Development, 11, 16–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 265–322). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T. (2010). Episodic memory versus episodic foresight: Similarities and differences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews in Cognitive Science, 1, 99–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tillman, K. A., & Barner, D. (2015). Learning the language of time: Children’s acquisition of duration words. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 57–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2006). Young children’s understanding of present and past tense. Language Learning and Development, 2, 251–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense interpretation. Journal of Child Language, 28, 661–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Primary language acquisition. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), 458–480.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., & Lyytinen, P. (1991). A cross-linguistic perspective on the development of temporal systems. Journal of Child Language, 18, 67–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weist, R. M., Atanassova, M., Wysocka, H., & Pawlak, A. (1999). Spatial and temporal systems in child language and thought: A cross-linguistic study. First Language, 19, 267–311.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue