Cover not available

In:The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Pilar Prieto and Núria Esteve-Gibert
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 23] 2018
► pp. 247–270

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 13
Gradual development of focus prosody and affect prosody comprehension

A proposal for a holistic approach

 | Ohio State University
Published online: 24 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.23.13ito
Excellence in communication skills requires an ability to appropriately represent the discourse structure including focus, as well as good comprehension of speaker affect. Both focus and affect are communicated in large part through prosody, so comprehension and production of the accompanying prosody is essential. However, past studies on focus prosody have been both theoretically and methodologically separated from the research on affect prosody. (In this chapter, I use the term ‘focus prosody’ to refer to prosodic phenomena that are either produced or perceived as the cue to a specific part of speech that conveys the focal content of a message. This includes ‘narrow focus’, which is defined in terms of the informational scope (e.g., answers to Wh-questions), and ‘contrastive focus’, which is a subtype of narrow focus that evokes interpretational alternatives.) This chapter argues that the suggested difference in the developmental trajectory (i.e., focus prosody develops slower as compared to affect prosody) may be an artifact of the perspective divergence, and points out that the mastery of prosodic skills in both these domains must be necessarily gradual – though they may not develop hand-in-hand. A holistic approach that considers the interaction between affect prosody and focus prosody is proposed as a future direction of the research on prosodic development within and across individuals.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical division: Fundamental affect function vs. complex information-structuring function of prosody?
  • Methodological division: Passive tasks to test affect detection vs. interactive tasks to test focus comprehension
  • Slow development of prosodic skills and slow development of developmental theory: Why does it take so long?
  • Interaction and integration of affect prosody and focus prosody
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (105)
References
Arnold, J. E. (2008). THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases. Cognition, 108, 69–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 8, 47–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1996). The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 17–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English, Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belyk, M., & Brown, S. (2013). Perception of affective and linguistic prosody: An ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1395–1403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, J. M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2010). Preschoolers’ appreciation of speaker vocal affect as a cue to referential intent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 87–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Preschoolers’ real-time coordination of vocal and facial emotional information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 391–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language: Phonology (Vol. 2, pp.471–524). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, D. H., Eilers, R. E., & Oller, D. K. (1984). Infants’ discrimination of intensity variation in multisyllabic stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 13–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, A. (2014). Production-comprehension Asymmetry: Individual differences in the acquisition of prosody focus-marking. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody – Dublin, 423–427.
Cole, J., Mo, Y., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2010). Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence. Laboratory Phonology, 1(2), 425–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development, 61, 1584–1595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Swinney, D. A. (1987). Prosody and the development of comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 14, 145–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1974). An experiment involving comprehension of intonation in children from 7 to 10. Journal of Child Language, 1, 221–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). Intonation comprehension in ten-yea-olds. Journal of Child Language 12, 643–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1979). Prosodic development. In P. Fletcher, & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp.33–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Pattison, P. E., Jackson, H. J., & Wales, R. J. (2001). Facial affect and affective prosody recognition in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 48, 235–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demenescu, L. R., Kato, Y., & Mathiak, K. (2015). Neural processing of emotional prosody across the adult lifespan. BioMed Research International. Article ID 590216.
Durand, K., Gallay, M., Seigneuric, A., Robichon, F., & Baudouin, J. Y. (2007). The development of facial emotion recognition: The role of configural information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 14–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dykens, E. M. (2003). Anxiety, fears, and phobias in persons with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 291–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eilers, R. E., Bull, D. H., Oller, D. K., & Lewis, D. C. (1984). The discrimination of vowel duration by infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1213–1218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ethofer, T., Bretscher, J., Gschwind, M., Kreifelts, B., Wildgruber, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). Emotional voice areas: anatomic location, functional properties, and structural connections revealed by combined fMRI/DTI. Cerebral Cortex, 221, 191–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ethofer, T., Kreifelts, B., Wiethoff, S., Wolf, J., Grodd, W., Vuilleumier, P., & Wildgruber, D. (2009). Differential influences of emotion, task, and novelty on brain regions underlying the processing of speech melody. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 217, 1255–1268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rhode, D. (2006). The nature of working memory in linguistic, arithmetic, and spatial integration processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 246–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 181–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Approval and disapproval: Infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages. Child Development, 64, 657–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Hearing, listening, and understanding: Auditory development in infancy. In G. Bremner, & A. Fogel (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp.35–70). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 279–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A., & Mazzie, C. (1991. Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 209–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernandez, R., & Picard, R. (2011). Recognizing affect from speech prosody using hierarchical graphical models. Speech Communication, 53, 1088–1103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flom, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2007). The development of infant discrimination of affect in multimodal and unimodal stimulation: The role of intersensory redundancy. Developmental Psychology, 431, 238–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2010). Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 367–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: A processing-resource account. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 88–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K., & Hurley, K. (2013). Infant-directed prosody helps infants map sounds to meanings. Infancy, 18(5), 797–824. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandjean, D., Sander, D., Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M., Scherer, K. R., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005). The voices of wrath: Brain responses to angry prosody in meaningless speech. Nature Neuroscience, 82, 145–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Two-year-olds use primary sentence accent to learn new words. Journal of Child Language, 34, 677–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Prosodic stress on a word directs 24-month-olds’ attention to a contextually new referent. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3098–3105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, T., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Infants’ electric brain responses to emotional prosody. Neuroreport, 16, 1825–1828. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hargrove, P. M. (2013). Pursuing prosody interventions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27, 647–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. (2002). The pragmatics of intonational meaning. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 – Aix-en-Provence, 65–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herold, B., Weissenborn, J., & Nazzi, T. (2009). Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 262–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornby, P. (1971). Surface structure and the topic-comment distinction: A developmental study. Child Development, 42, 1975–1988. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornby, P., & Hass, W. (1970). Use of contrastive stress by preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 395–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Igualada, A., Esteve-Gibert, N., & Prieto, P. (2017). “Beat gestures improve word recall in 3- to 5- year- old children”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 156: 99–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, K., & Martens, M. (2017). Contrast-marking prosodic emphasis in Williams syndrome: results of detailed phonetic analysis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52, 46–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, K. (2014). Children’s pragmatic use of prosodic prominence. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp.199–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, K., Bibyk, S., Wagner, L., & Speer, S. R. (2014a). Interpretation of contrastive pitch accent in 6- to 11-year-old English speaking children and adults. Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 84–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, K., Jincho, N., Minai, U., Yamane, N., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: Evidence from Japanese adults & 6-year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 265–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, K., Martens, M., & McKenna, E. (2014b, March). Processing of pitch prominence in Williams syndrome. Talk presented at 27th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbus, USA.
Ito, K., Turnbull, R., & Speer, S. R. (2017). Allophonic tunes of contrast: Lab and spontaneous speech lead to equivalent fixation responses in museum visitors. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1): 6, 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, S-A. (Ed.) (2005). Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. (1993). Preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2001). Impact of intended emotion intensity on cue utilization and decoding accuracy in vocal expression of emotion. Emotion, 1, 381–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, G., Cohn, J., & Moore, C. (1996). A combination of vocal F0 dynamic and summary features discriminates between three pragmatic categories of infant-directed speech. Child Development, 67, 205–217.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13–F21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurumada, C. (2013). Navigating variability in the linguistic signal: Learning to interpret contrastive prosody. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurumada, C., Brown, M., Bibyk, S., Pontillo, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Is it or isn’t it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings. Cognition, 133, 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laukka, P., Juslin, P., & Bresin, R. (2005). A dimensional approach to vocal expression of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 633–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, E-K., & Fraundorf, S. (2016). Effects of contrastive accents in memory for L2 discourse. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000638Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, E-K., & Snedeker, J. (2016). Effects of contrastive accents on children’s discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1589–1595.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, R. D. (2008). Intonational phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, W., Golinkoff, R. M., Houston, D., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Word learning in infant- and adult-directed speech. Language Learning and Development, 7, 209–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural development study. Journal of Verbal Learning Verbal, 17, 539–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton P. M. (1999). Rule learning by 7-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P. W., & Johnson, E. K. (2000). Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oudeyer, P-Y. (2003). The production and recognition of emotion in speech: Features and algorithms. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 157–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Owren, M. J., & Rendall, D. (1997). An affect-conditioning model of nonhuman primate vocalizations. In D. W. Owings, M. D. Beecher, & N. S. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology (Vol. 12, pp.299–346). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peppé, S. J. E. (2009). Aspects of identifying prosodic impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(4), 332–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peppé, S., & McCann, J. (2003). Assessing intonation and prosody in children with atypical language development: The PEPS-C test and the revised version. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 345–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pihan, H., Tabert, M., Assuras, S., & Borod, J. (2008). Unattended emotional intonations modulate linguistic prosody processing. Brain and Language, 105, 141–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prencipe, A., Kesek, A., Cohen, J., Lamm, C., Lewis, M. D., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). Development of hot and cool executive function during the transition to adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 621–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, E. D. (1981). The aprosodias: functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere. Archives of Neurology, 38, 561–569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development, 27, 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Calder, A. J., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2251–2272 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R., & Kappas, A. (1988). Primate vocal expression of affective state. In D. Todt, P. Goedeking, & D. Symmes (Eds.), Primate vocal communication (pp.171–194). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuller, B., Steidl, S., & Batliner, A. (2009). The INTERSPEECH 2009 emotion challenge. Proceedings of the 10th International Speech Communication Association Annual Conference – Brighton, 312–315.
Schuller, B., Steidl, S., Batliner, A., Burkhardt, F., Devillers, L., Müller, C., & Narayanan, S., (2010). THE INTERSPEECH 2010 paralinguistic challenge. Proceedings of the 11th International Speech Communication Association Annual Conference – Chiba, 2794–2797.
Sekerina, I. E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2012). Interactive processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children. First Language, 32(1–2), 63–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shic, F., Macari, S., & Chawarska, K. (2014). Speech disturbs face scanning in 6-month-old infants who develop Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 231–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shukla, M., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Prosody guids the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6038–6043.
Solan, L. (1980). Contrastive stress and children’s interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 688–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy, 7, 53–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomalski, P. (2015). Developmental trajectory of audiovisual speech integration in early infancy. A review of studies using the McGurk paradigm. Psychology of Language and Communication, 19, 77–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Approaches to studying world-situated language use. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turnbull, R. (2016). The role of predictability in intonational variability. Language and Speech, 60, 123–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turnbull, R., Royer, A., Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2017). Prominence perception is dependent on phonology, semantics, and awareness of discourse. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. DOI:Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaillant-Molina, M., Bahrick, L. E., & Flom, R. (2013). Young infants match facial and vocal emotional expressions of other infants. Infancy, 18(suppl. 1), E97–E111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voyer, D., Thibodeau, S-H., & Delong, B. J. (2014). Context, contrast, and tone of voice in auditory sarcasm perception. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 29–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vulchanova, M., Foyn, C. H., Nilsen, R. A., & Sigmundsson, H. (2014). Links between phonological memory, first language competence and second language competence in 10-year-old children. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 87–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker A. S. (1982). Intermodal perception of expressive behaviors by human infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 514–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker-Andrews, A. S. (1998). Emotions and social development: infants' recognition of emotions in others. Pediatrics, 102 (5 Suppl E), 1268–1271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Infants’ perception of expressive behaviors: Differentiation of multimodal information. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 437–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker-Andrews, A. S., & Grolnick W. (1983). Discrimination of vocal expression by young infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 491–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker-Andrews A. S., & Lennon, E. (1991). Infants’ discrimination of vocal expressions: Contributions of auditory and visual information. Infant Behavior & Development, 14, 131–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, B., Peppé, S., & Goulandris, N. (2004). Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language, 31, 749–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 121–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., Kreifelts, B., & Ethofer, T. (2006). Cerebral processing of linguistic and emotional prosody: fMRI studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2002). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp.445–469). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Destruel, Emilie, Louise Lalande & Aoju Chen
2024. The development of prosodic focus marking in French. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Pronina, Mariia, Pilar Prieto, Luca Bischetti & Valentina Bambini
2023. Expressive Pragmatics and Prosody in Young Preschoolers are More Closely Related to Structural Language than to Mentalizing. Language Learning and Development 19:3 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Zanchi, Paola, Sue Peppé & Laura Zampini
2022. Prosodic development from 4 to 10 years: Data from the Italian adaptation of the PEPS-C. Speech Communication 144 ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Pronina, Mariia, Iris Hübscher, Ingrid Vilà-Giménez & Pilar Prieto
2021. Bridging the Gap Between Prosody and Pragmatics: The Acquisition of Pragmatic Prosody in the Preschool Years and Its Relation With Theory of Mind. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Woodard, Kristina, Rista C. Plate, Michele Morningstar, Adrienne Wood & Seth D. Pollak
2021. Categorization of Vocal Emotion Cues Depends on Distributions of Input. Affective Science 2:3 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Hübscher, Iris & Pilar Prieto
2019. Gestural and Prosodic Development Act as Sister Systems and Jointly Pave the Way for Children’s Sociopragmatic Development. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue