In:Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 287–312
Chapter 14A unified model of first and second language learning
Published online: 22 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.15mac
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.15mac
Abstract
The Unified Competition Model views first and second language learning as depending on a shared set of socio-cognitive processes. Differences between the two types of acquisition depend not on the expiration of a critical period, but on the operation of the risk factors of entrenchment, transfer, overanalysis, and isolation. Entrenchment is a neural process that arises from ongoing use of L1 across years. Transfer and parasitism arise from the dominance of L1 during initial L2 learning. Overanalysis stems from the tendency of adult learners to focus on content words, rather than phrases. Isolation arises from the tendency over time for L1 groups to reject the participation of out-group members and from increasing demands for the L1 group. These risk factors can be countered through the processes of resonance, decoupling, chunking, and participation that are available to all learners, but which must become sharpened to promote L2 acquisition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Three frameworks
- 2.1Competition
- 2.2Structural analysis
- 2.3Timeframes
- 3.Risk factors and support factors
- 3.1Entrenchment
- 3.2Resonance
- 3.3Transfer
- 3.4Decoupling
- 3.5Overanalysis
- 3.6Chunking
- 3.7Isolation
- 3.8Participation
- 3.9Applications
- 4.Summary
References
References (102)
Arbib, M. 2014. Language evolution: An emergentist perspective. In Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O'Grady (eds). New York NY: Wiley.
Asato, M. R., Terwilliger, R., Woo, J. & Luna, B. 2010. White matter development in adolescence: A DTI study. Cerebral Cortex 20: 2122–2131.
Asher, J. 1969. The total physical response approach to second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 53: 3–17.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. 1982. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (eds), 173–218. Cambridge: CUP.
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A. & Smith, S. 1982. Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition 11: 245–299.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. & Luk, G. 2012. Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16: 240–250.
Birdsong, D. 2005. Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, J. F. Kroll & A.M.B. de Groot (eds), 109–128. Oxford: OUP.
Bley-Vroman, R. 2009. The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 175–198.
Bongaerts, T. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, D. Birdsong (ed.), 133–159. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Casey, B. J., Giedd, J. N. & Thomas, K. M. 2000. Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology 54: 241–257.
Clark, B., Wagner, J., Lindemalm, K. & Bendt, O. 2011. Språkskap: Supporting second language learning “in the wild”. Paper presented at the INCLUDE, London.
DeKeyser, R. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 499–533.
Dong, Y. -P., Gui, S. -C. & MacWhinney, B. 2005. Shared and separate meanings in the bilingual mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8: 221–238.
Doria, V., Beckman, C. F., Arichi, T. & Merchant, N. 2010. Emergence of resting state networks in the preterm human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 20015–20020.
Eckman, F. R. 1977. Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27: 315–330.
Ellis, N. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188.
Ellis, N. & Beaton, A. 1995. Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. In Lexical Issues in Language Learning, B. Harley (ed.), 107–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Engeström, Y. 1999. Activity theory and individual social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory, Y. Engeström, R. -L. Punamäki & R. Miettinen (eds), 1–15. Cambridge: CUP.
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H. & Liu, S. 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41: 78–104.
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Friederici, A., Steinhauer, K. & Pfeifer, E. 2002. Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 529–534.
Gobet, F. 2005. Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19: 183–204.
Grosjean, F. 1997. Processing mixed languages: Issues, findings and models. In Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, A.M.B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (eds), 225–254. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guenther, F. & Gjaja, M. 1996. The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 1111–1121.
Gupta, P. & MacWhinney, B. 1997. Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language 59: 267–333.
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E. & Wiley, E. 2003. Critical evidence: A test of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. Psychological Science 14: 31–38.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermuller, F. 2004. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41: 301–307.
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.
Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B. 1999. Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 129–171.
Krashen, S. 1994. The Input Hypothesis and its rivals. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages, N. C. Ellis (ed.), 45–78. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Kroll, J. & Sholl, A. 1992. Lexical and conceptual memory in fluent and nonfluent bilinguals. In Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals, R. Harris (ed.), 191–206. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kroll, J. & Tokowicz, N. 2005. Models of bilingual representation and processing. In Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, J. F. Kroll & A.M.B. de Groot (eds), 531–554. Oxford: OUP.
Kuhl, P., Conboy, B., Padden, D., Nelson, T. & Pruitt, J. 2005. Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the “Critical Period”. Language Learning and Development 1: 237–264.
Li, P., Zhao, X. & MacWhinney, B. 2007. Dynamic self-organization and early lexical development in children. Cognitive Science 31: 581–612.
MacDonald, M., Pearlmutter, N. J. & Seidenberg, M. S. 1994. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101(4): 676–703.
MacWhinney, B. 1982. Basic syntactic processes. In Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: Syntax and Semantics, S. Kuczaj (ed.), 73–136. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1987. The Competition Model. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, B. MacWhinney (ed.), 249–308. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2008. How mental models encode embodied linguistic perspectives. In Embodiment, Ego-Space, and Action, R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney & M. Behrmann (eds), 369–410. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2012. The logic of the Unified Model. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds), 211–227. New York NY: Routledge.
2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov & E. Moravcsik (eds), 364–386. Oxford: OUP.
In press. Entrenchment in second language learning. In Entrenchment, Memory and Automaticity: The Psychology of Linguistic Knowledge and Language Learning, H. -J. Schmid (ed.). New York NY: American Psychological Association.
Major, R. 1987. The natural phonology of second language acquisition. In Sound Patterns in Second Language Acquisition, A. James & J. Leather (eds), 207–224. Dordrecht: Foris.
Major, R. & Faudree, M. 1996. Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 69–90.
Matessa, M. & Anderson, J. 2000. Modeling focused learning in role assignment. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 263–292.
McCauley, S., Monaghan, P. & Christiansen, M. 2015. Usage-based language learning. In The Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O'Grady (eds), 415–436. New York NY: Wiley.
McClelland, J. 1987. The case for interactionism in language processing. In Attention and Performance, XII: The Psychology of Reading, M. Coltheart (ed.), 3–36. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDonald, J. 1986. The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 317–335.
McDonald, J. & Heilenman, K. 1991. Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics 12: 313–348.
McLaughlin, B. 1985. Second-Language Acquisition in Childhood. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. 2006. Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 329–383.
Mills, D., Coffey-Corina, S. & Neville, H. 1997. Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months. Developmental Neuropsycholog, 13: 397–445.
Molfese, D. L., Freeman, R. D. & Palermo, D. S. 1975. The ontogeny of brain lateralization for speech and nonspeech stimuli. Brain and Language 2: 356–368.
Müller, J., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y. & Friederici, A. 2005. Native and nonnative speakers' processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 1229–1244.
Munakata, Y., McClelland, J., Johnson, M. & Siegler, R. 1997. Rethinking infant knowledge: An adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review 104: 686–713.
Nelson, K. 1998. Language in Cognitive Development: The Emergence of the Mediated Mind. Cambridge: CUP.
Paradis, M. 2004. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pavlenko, A. & Lantolf, J. 2000. Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, A. Pavlenko & J. Lantolf (eds), 155–178. Oxford: OUP.
Pavlik, P. & Anderson, J. 2005. Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: An activation-based model of the spacing effect. Cognitive Science 29: 559–586.
Pavlik, P., Presson, N., Dozzi, G., Wu, S., MacWhinney, B. & Koedinger, K. R. 2007. The FaCT (Fact and Concept Training) system: A new tool linking cognitive science with educators. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1379–1384. Nashville TN: Cognitive Science Society.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S. & Håkansson, G. 2005. Processing constraints on L1 transfer. In Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, J. F. Kroll & A.M.B. de Groot (eds), 128–153. Oxford: OUP.
Presson, N., Davy, C. & MacWhinney, B. 2013. Experimentalized CALL for adult second language learners. In Innovative Research and Practices in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism [Language Learning and Language Teaching 38], J. Schwieter (ed.), 139–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B. & Tokowicz, N. 2014. Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 35: 709–737.
Prior, A., MacWhinney, B. & Kroll, J. 2007. Translation norms for English and Spanish: The role of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficiency in negotiating translation ambiguity. Behavior Research Methods 37: 134–140.
Sidtis, D. 2014. Formulaic language: Acquisition, use, and neurological foundations. In Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O'Grady (eds), 578–600. New York NY: Wiley.
Simon, H. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–482.
Skehan, P. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30: 510–532.
Snow, C. E. 1999. Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In The Emergence of Language, B. MacWhinney (ed.), 257–276. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Snow, C. E. & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. 1978. The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development 49: 1114–1128.
Swain, M. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, E. Hinkel (ed.), 471–484. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Taraban, R. & Palacios, J. M. 1993. Exemplar models and weighted cue models in category learning. In Categorization by Humans and Machines, G. Nakamura, R. Taraban & D. Medin (eds), 91–127. San Diego CA: Acdemic Press.
Tokowicz, N. & MacWhinney, B. 2005. Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 173–204.
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a First Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Werker, J. & Hensch, T. 2014. Critical periods in speech perception: New directions. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 173–196.
Werker, J. & Tees, R. 2005. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology 46: 233–251.
Wessinger, C. M., Buonocore, M. H., Kussmaul, C. L. & Mangun, G. R. 1997. Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping 5: 18–25.
Wittenberg, G., Sullivan, M. & Tsien, J. 2002. Synaptic reentry reinforcement based network model for long-term memory consolidation. Hippocampus 12: 637–647.
Yamamoto, K., Hoffman, D. S. & Strick, P. 2006. Rapid and long lasting plasticity of input output mapping Journal of Neurophysiology 96: 2797–2798.
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Chromý, Jan, Radim Lacina, James Brand & Norbert Vanek
Famoyegun, Akinjide, Giang T. Pham, Lisa M. Bedore & Elizabeth D. Peña
Hervé, Coralie & Laurel Lawyer
Laméris, Tim Joris & Yōsuke Igarashi
2025. Individual variation in epenthetic vowel production by Brazilian Portuguese–Japanese bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Laméris, Tim Joris, Maki Kubota, Tanja Kupisch, Jennifer Cabrelli, Neal Snape & Jason Rothman
MacWhinney, Brian & Zhe Gao
McManus, Kevin, Kelly Bayas, Katherine Kerschen, Yulia Khoruzhaya, Jingyuan Zhuang & Alex Magnuson
Mirzaei, Azizullah, Zahra Beigi, Zohreh R. Eslami, Ali Roohani & Mack D. Burke
Jach, Daniel
2024. What foreign language learners make of grammatical descriptions depends on description type, proficiency, and
context. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Walter, Daniel R., Galya Fischer, Janelle Cai & Thiago P. Fernandes
Wolpert, Max, Jiarui Ao, Hui Zhang, Shari Baum & Karsten Steinhauer
Banaruee, Hassan, Omid Khatin-Zadeh & Danyal Farsani
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine L. & Brian MacWhinney
Kenanidis, Panagiotis, Ewa Dąbrowska, Miquel Llompart, Diana Pili-Moss & Claudia Felser
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
Zhang, Yanhui & Brian MacWhinney
Zhang, Yanhui & Brian MacWhinney
Ning, Jinghong, Gang Peng, Yi Liu & Yingnan Li
Verbeek, Lisa, Constance Vissers, Mirjam Blumenthal & Ludo Verhoeven
Ahn, Hyunah
Gao, Zhe
2020. L2 learning of opaque Chinese compounds through elaborative encoding. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 55:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gonzalves, Lisa
Gonzalves, Lisa
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
