Cover not available

In:Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 139–160

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Gesture and speech in adults’ and children’s narratives

A cross-linguistic investigation of Zulu and French

 | Laboratoire Linguistique et Didactique des Langues Etrangères et Maternelles, Université Grenoble Alpes
 | Department of Linguistics, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
 | Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès & CNRS
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.08col
Abstract
This chapter reports on a cross-linguistic developmental study comparing speech and gesture produced in narratives by adults and children speaking either French (a non-pro-drop Romance language) or Zulu (a pro-drop Bantu language). We asked 72 participants (French: 12 adults and 24 children; Zulu: 12 adults and 24 children) to narrate a short silent cartoon. Zulu narratives were more detailed and contained fewer comments than the French. Zulu-speaking participants produced more representational and fewer pragmatic gestures than their French-speaking counterparts. Language differences do not explain this result. Rather, the findings support the gesture-speech co-expressivity framework and suggest an impact of literacy practice norms on multimodal narrative performance during later language acquisition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The role of gesture in the development of multimodal communication
    • 1.2The role of language-specific factors in the development of multimodal communication
    • 1.3Aims of the present investigation
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Procedure
    • 2.3Coding
      • 2.3.1Speech coding
      • 2.3.2Discourse cohesive clues
      • 2.3.3Gesture coding
      • 2.3.4Rates per clause
      • 2.3.5Reliability
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Effects of language and age on linguistic measures
    • 3.2Effects of language and age on gestural measures
    • 3.3The role of gesture in tracking referents in Zulu narratives
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Effects of language on narratives
    • 4.2Effects of language on gestures
    • 4.3Effects of age on narratives
    • 4.4Effects of age on gesture
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (30)
References
Bresnan, J. & Mchombo, S. 1986. Grammatical and anaphoric agreement. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society 22(2): 278–297.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., De Angelis, V. & Graziano, M. 2011. Learning to use gesture in narratives: Developmental trends in formal and semantic gesture competence. In Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture [ Gesture studies 4], G. Stam & M. Ishino (eds), 189–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J. -M. 2004. Le développement de la parole chez l'enfant agé de 6 à 11 ans. Corps, langage et cognition. Sprimont: Mardaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J. -M., Guidetti, M., Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., Demir, O. E., Kunene-Nicolas, R. K. & Levine, S. 2015. Effects of age and language on co-speech gesture production: An investigation of French, American, and Italian children’s narratives. Journal of Child Language 42(1): 122–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colletta, J. -M., Pellenq, C. & Guidetti, M. 2010. Age-related changes in co-speech gesture and narrative: Evidence from French children and adults. Speech Communication 52: 565–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristilli, C., Capirci, O. & Graziano, M. 2010. Le funzioni anaforiche della gestualità nel racconto dei bambini [The anaphoric function of gestures in children’s narratives]. In La Comunicazione Parlata 3, Atti del Terzo Congresso Internazionale del Gruppo di Studi Sulla Comunicazione Parlata. Vol I [In Oral Communication, Proceedings from the Third International Congress of the Research Group on Oral Commnication], M. Pettorino, A. Giannini & F. M. Dovetto (eds), 307–339. Naples: Università degli Studi di Napoli “l’Orientale”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K. 2000. Bantu noun class systems: Loan word and acquisition evidence of semantic productivity. In Classification Systems, G. Senft (ed.), 270–292. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fayol, M. 1997. Des idées au texte. Psychologie cognitive de la production verbale, orale et ecrite. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interactions between Speakers and Hearers. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groenewald, H. 2004. Zulu oral art. Oral Tradition 18(1): 87–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, F. 1996. Enfances de la lecture. Manières de faire, manières de dire à l’école maternelle. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. 2006. Handling discourse: Gestures reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning 56(1): 155–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jisa, H. 2000. Increasing cohesion in narratives: A developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects. French Linguistics 38(3): 591–620.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2003. Children’s Discourse: Person, Space and Time across Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. & Hendriks, H. 1999. Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives: A comparison of English, French, German, and Chinese. Journal of Child Language 26: 419–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunene, R. 2010. A Comparative Study of the Development of Multimodal Narratives in French and Zulu Children and Adults. PhD dissertation, Stendhal University, Grenoble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helm (ed.), 12–44. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marten, L., Kempson, R. & Bouzouita, M. 2008. Structural underspecification in Romance and Bantu: A procedural perspective. In The Bantu-Romance Connection: A Comparative Investigation of Verbal Agreement, DPs, and Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131], C. de Cat & K. Demuth (eds), 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Gesture-speech unity: Phylogenesis, ontogenesis and microgenesis. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 5(2): 137–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. & Levy, E. T. 1993. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16(4): 363–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. & Ishizuka, T. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44: 1040–1054. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramaila, Z. M. 2005. An Investigation of the Potential Role that Folklore can Play in Environmental Education: A Case Study of Mphoko. Magister Artium thesis, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reig Alamillo, A., Colletta, J. -M. & Kunene, R. N. 2010. Reference tracking in gesture and speech. A developmental study on French narratives. Rivista di Psicholinguistica Applicata X(3): 75–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeller, J. 2008. The subject marker in Bantu as an antifocus marker. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 221–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kunene Nicolas, Ramona & Nonhlanhla Ntuli
2025. The Discursive Strategies in the Spoken Narratives of Multilingual Sepitori and Sesotho Speakers. Languages 10:5 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue