Cover not available

In:Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 81–102

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
Retrieving meaning from noun and verb grammatical contexts

Interindividual variation among 2- to 4-year-old French-speaking children

 | Laboratoire Modèles, Dynamique, Corpus & Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Université Paris Descartes & CNRS
 | Laboratoire Modèles, Dynamique, Corpus, INSERM, Université Paris Nanterre & CNRS
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.05ven
Abstract
Ninety French-speaking children aged 2 to 4 years were presented with short utterances containing homophonous or nonce words whose object or action meaning was identifiable on the sole basis of the preceding grammatical morpheme. Items in noun and verb contexts were presented to the same children in order to assess their ability to provide appropriate contrastive interpretations. Results show that, at all ages, items were correctly identified beyond chance, with 4-year-olds outperforming the 2- and 3-year-olds. Individually, however, only part of the children, even in the older group, performed beyond chance level, suggesting substantial interindividual variability and difficulties, still present at these ages, to tackle situations offering minimal information. A case study of the developmental relation between production and comprehension is also presented.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • Participants
    • Procedure
    • Material
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Group results
      • 3.1.1Success rate: All items
      • 3.1.2Success rate: Meaningful and nonce words
      • 3.1.3Effect of age on success rate: All items
      • 3.1.4Effect of age on success rate: Meaningful and nonce words
    • 3.2Individual subjects’ results
      • 3.2.1All items
      • 3.2.2Meaningful homophonous and nonce words
    • 3.3A case study of the relation between production and comprehension
  • 4.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (41)
References
Bassano, D. 2000. Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27: 512–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassano, D., Eme, E. & Champaud, C. 2005. A naturalistic study of early lexical development: General processes and inter-individual variations in French children. First Language 25(1): 67–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A. 2007. Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development 3: 325–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clairis, C. 1984. Nom et verbe. Modèles Linguistiques VI(1): 23–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Junge, C., Soderstrom, M. & Hagoort, P. 2014. Predicting individual variation in language from infant speech perception measures. Child Development 85: 1330–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerken, L. & McIntosh, B. 1993. Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology 29(3): 448–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A. 1999. Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73: 135–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A. & Schmitz, M. 2004. Functional elements in infants’ speech processing: The role of determiners in the syntactic categorization of lexical elements. Infancy 5: 341–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T. 1991. Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27(2): 236–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E. & Macnamara, J. 1974. What’s in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development 45: 469–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch M. & Dressler W. U. 2000. Are fillers as precursors of morphemes relevant for morphological theory? In Morphological Analysis in Comparison [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 201], W. U. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer, M. Pöchtrager & J. Rennison (eds), 89–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, G. 1984. La distinction entre nom et verbe en morphologie et en syntaxe. Modèles Linguistiques VI(1): 29–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M. & Baldwin, G. 1997. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24: 187–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lléo, C. 1997. Filler syllables, proto-articles and early prosodic constraints in Spanish and German. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge, Representation, and Processing. Proceedings of GALA 1997, A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds), 251–256. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Chalkley, M. A. 1980. The internal language of children’s syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Children’s Language, Vol. 2, K. Nelson (ed.), 127–214. New York NY: Gardner Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, A., Ziv, T. & Sommerville, J. A. 2016. Variability and individual differences in early social perception and social cognition. Research Topic in Frontiers in Psychology. <[URL]>
Mintz, T. H. 2006. Finding the verbs: Distributional cues to categories available to young learners. In Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs, K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (eds), 31–63. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R. 1990. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 17: 357–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand L. & Matos, R. 2001. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique 101: 447–462. <[URL]>
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M. & Ferrand, L. 2004. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36(3): 516–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pepinsky, T., Demuth, K. & Roark, B. 2001. The status of ‘filler syllables’ in children’s early speech. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A.H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (ed.) 575–586. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn L. 1993. False starts and filler-syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69: 742–777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petretic, P. A. & Tweney, R. D. 1977. Does comprehension precede production? The development of children’s responses to telegraphic sentences of varying grammatical adequacy. Journal of Child Language 4: 201–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. 1999. Linguistic categories. In Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, K. Brown & J. Miller (eds), 6670. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, R. 2014. Functional morphemes and early language acquisition. Child Development Perspectives 8(1): 6–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, R. & Lepage, M. 2008. The effect of functional morphemes on word segmentation in pre-verbal infants. Developmental Science 11(3): 407–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. & Cutler, A. 2006. Recognition and representation of function words in English-learning infants. Infancy 10: 187–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. F. & Morgan, J. L. 1999. Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition 72(2): B11–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shipley, E., Smith, C. & Gleitman, L. 1969. A study in the acquisition of language. Language 45: 322–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. 1988. The emergent lexicon from a phonetic perspective. In The Emergent Lexicon, M. Smith & J. Locke (eds), 75–109. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taelman, H., Durieux, G. & Gillis, S. 2009. Fillers as signs of distributional learning. Journal of Child Language 36: 323–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tersis-Surugue, N. 1984. L’opposition verbo-nominale dans diverses langues du monde: Présentation. Modèles Linguistiques VI(1): 5–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thelen, E. 1991. Motor aspects of emergent speech: A dynamic approach. In Biological and Behavioral Determinants of Language Development, N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch & M. Studdert-Kennedy (eds), 339–362. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1992. First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Abbot-Smith, K. 2002. A tale of two theories: Response to Fisher. Cognition 83: 207–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. 2003. The emergence of noun and verb categories in the acquisition of French. Psychology of Language and Communication 7(1): 23–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Noun and Verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In Polycategoriality and Lexical Categories: Cross-Linguistic, Cross-Theoretical and Language Acquisition Approaches [Studies in Language Companion Series 182], V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (eds). , 381–411 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C. 2010. The acquisition of early verbs in French: Assessing the role of conversation and of child-directed speech. First Language 30(3–4): 287–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano E. & Sinclair H. 2000. The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27: 461–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R., Lidz, J. L., Braun, I. E. & Lavin, T. 2009. Twenty four-month-old infants' interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology 59(1): 67–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Veneziano, Edy
2022. Nominal and Verbal Morphology in the Early Acquisition of French: A First Study of the Relation Between Comprehension and Production. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Batista, Aurore, Marie-Thérèse Le Normand & Jean-Marc Colletta
2019. Chapitre 3. Rôle et évolution des combinaisons bimodales au cours de l’acquisition du langage. Données chez l’enfant francophone âgé de 18 à 42 mois. In Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition, DOI logo
Dickinson, David K., Kerry G. Hofer & Bretta L. Rivera
2019. Chapter 1. The developing language foundation for reading comprehension. In Narrative, Literacy and Other Skills [Studies in Narrative, 25], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Parisse, Christophe & Caroline Rossi
2017. Semantic discrimination of Noun/Verb categories in French children aged 1;6 to 2;11. In Lexical Polycategoriality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 182], ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Vapnarsky, Valentina & Edy Veneziano
2017. Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches. In Lexical Polycategoriality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 182], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue