Cover not available

In:Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 45–62

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
Phonological categories and their manifestation in child phonology

 | Department of Linguistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.03ros
Abstract
The nature of phonological representations and of their acquisition by language learners has been a subject of debate since at least the 1970s. Vihman and Croft (2007) recently proposed the ‘Radical’ Templatic approach to phonology, which formally rejects segmental features as independent units of phonological representation, in spite of their central relevance within mainstream theories of phonology since at least the 1940s. In this chapter, I emphasize that abstract categories are in fact central to our characterization of phonological systems and their acquisition by language learners. I discuss longitudinal data on the development of consonants and consonant clusters in the productions of Catootje, a Dutch-learning child. I highlight several categorical effects that are readily captured in models of phonological development which embrace abstract units such as features and syllable constituents.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1Abstract phonological models
    • 1.2‘Radical’ Templatic Phonology
  • 2.Case study
    • 2.1The corpus
    • 2.2The target system
    • 2.3Catootje’s general development of singleton and branching onsets
    • 2.4Variability in the acquisition of [d] in onsets
    • 2.5Variability in the acquisition of onset clusters
  • 3.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (66)
References
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. 2011. Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A. 2003. Asymmetries in the acquisition of consonant clusters in Spanish. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 48(3–4): 179–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. & Edwards, J. 2000. Lexical frequency effects on young children’s imitative productions. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, M. B. Broe & J. B. Pierrehumbert (eds), 207–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. H. & Stemberger, J. P. 1998. Handbook of Phonological Development from the Perspective of Constraint-Based Nonlinear Phonology. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. 1999. The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Reflections on usage-based phonology. Book Review of Joan Bybee, 2001, Phonology and Language Use. Studies in Language 28: 225–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K. 1995. Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 25, J. N. Beckman (ed.), 13–25. Amherst MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. A prosodic approach to filler syllables. Journal of Child Language 28(1): 246–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K., Patrolia, M., Yung Song J. & Masapollo, M. 2011. The development of articles in children’s early Spanish: Prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form. First Language 32(1–2): 17–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. 1975. Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51: 419–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. 1994. On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure [HIL Dissertations in Linguistics 6]. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. & Freitas, M. J. 2004. The role of language-specific phonotactics in the acquisition of onset clusters. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, L. Cornips & J. Doetjes (eds), 58–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Allophony and allomorphy cue phonological development: Evidence from the European Portuguese vowel system. Journal of Catalan Linguistics 5: 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. & Levelt, C. 2008. How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children’s developing grammars. In Contrast in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition, P. Avery, B. Elan Dresher & K. Rice (eds), 231–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. 1969. Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5: 253–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. Branching structure within the syllable. Journal of Linguistics 23: 359–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerken, L. 1996. Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language 72(4): 683–712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H. 2012. sC Clusters Are (almost always) coda-initial. The Linguistic Review 29(3): 335–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H. & Rose, Y. 2004. Input elaboration, head faithfulness and evidence for representation in the acquisition of left-edge clusters in West Germanic. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, R. Kager, J. Pater & W. Zonneveld (eds), 109–157. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A. 1976. An overview of Autosegmental Phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2: 23–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, M. & Reiss, C. 1998. Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4): 656–683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. [English edition, Keiler, R. (trans). 1968. Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. & Halle, M. 1952. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, D. 1976. Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. & McGregor, K. K. 1991. Unusual phonological patterns and their underlying representations: A case study. Journal of Child Language 18: 261–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, C. 1994. On the Acquisition of Place [HIL Dissertations in Linguistics 8]. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120(11): 2546–2556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. 1979. Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua 49: 11–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Where’s phonology? In Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications, C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn & C. Stoel-Gammon (eds), 249–269. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Phonological acquisition. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), 671–696. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. & Davis, B. L. 1990. Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In Attention and Performance, XIII: Motor Representation and Control, M. Jeannerod (ed.), 453–476. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science 288: 527–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menn, L. 1971. Phonotactic Rules in beginning speech: A study in the development of English discourse. Lingua 26: 225–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983. Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In Language Production, Vol. 2, B. Butterworth (ed.), 1–49. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menn, L. & Vihman, M. M. 2011. Features in child phonology. In Where do Phonological Features Come From? [Language Faculty and Beyond 6], G. N. Clements & R. Ridouane (eds), 261–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mielke, J. 2011. Distinctive features. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, M. van Oostendorp & K. Rice (eds), 391–415. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pater, J. 1999. Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In The Prosody-Morphology Interface, R. Kager, W. Zonneveld & H. van der Hulst (eds), 310–343. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. 1977. Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Language 53: 560–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Language typology, prosody and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 5, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 136–197. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Fillers syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar. Journal of Child Language 28: 229–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L. 1993. False starts and filler syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69: 742–777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2–3): 115–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. 1977. One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language 4: 45–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, K. 1992. On deriving sonority: A structural account of sonority relationships. Phonology 9: 61–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Y. 1997. Sonority and the acquisition of Dutch syllable structure. In Proceedings of the Montréal-Ottawa-Toronto Phonology Workshop, Vol. 16, P. Avery & C. Smallwood (eds), 133–143. Toronto: Linguistics Graduate Course Union.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Internal and external influences on child language productions. In Approaches to Phonological Complexity, F. Pellegrino, E. Marsico, I. Chitoran & C. Coupé (eds), 329–351. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Y. & Inkelas, S. 2011. The interpretation of phonological patterns in first language acquisition. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, M. van Oostendorp & K. Rice (eds), 2414–2438. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Y. & MacWhinney, B. 2014. The PhonBank Project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, J. Durand, U. Gut & G. Kristoffersen (eds), 380–401. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Y., MacWhinney, B., Byrne, R., Hedlund, G., Maddocks K., O’Brien P. & Wareham T. 2006. Introducing Phon: A software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 489–500. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. 1980a. Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In Juncture: A Collection of Original Papers, M. Aronoff & M. L. Kean (eds), 107–129. Saratoga CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1980b. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 563–605.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1982. The syllable. In The Structure of Phonological Representation, Vol. 2, H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds), 337–385. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. 1973. The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. 1969. Principles of Phonology. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velleman, S. L. 1996. Metathesis highlights feature-by-position constraints. In Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition, B. H. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert & D. Ingram (eds), 173–186. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. 2000. The changing status of “filler syllables” on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27(3): 461–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. 2014. Phonological Development: The First Two Years, 2nd edn. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & Croft, W. 2007. Phonological development: toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics 45(4): 683–725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & Velleman, S. L. 2000. The construction of a First Phonology. Phonetica 57(2–4): 255–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waterson, N. 1971. Child phonology: A prosodic review. Journal of Linguistics 7: 179–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. Prosodic Phonology: The Theory and its Application to Language Acquisition and Speech Processing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Grevatt & Grevatt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wauquier-Gravelines, S. & Yamaguchi, N. 2013. Templates in French. In The Emergence of Phonology: Whole-word Approaches and Cross-linguistic Evidence, M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (eds), 317–342. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue