Cover not available

In:Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 19] 2016
► pp. 295–324

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Expression of temporality in Hebrew narratives written by deaf adolescents

 | Hadassah Academic College and University of Haifa
 | Hadassah Academic College and University of Haifa
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.19.10kup
The chapter examines how temporal relations are expressed in narratives written by deaf compared with hearing Hebrew-speaking adolescents. Written texts of deaf students manifest distinct characteristics, attributable to the different circumstances of acquisition of spoken language in the two populations. The study focuses on two facets of narrative temporality – use of an anchor tense and tense shifting – in order to shed light on linguistic features of cartoon-based texts written by deaf students in Hebrew. Findings show that deaf students have good mastery of Hebrew tense forms and some sensitivity to how these are used to express different discourse functions. However, narrative tense anchoring is less established among deaf than hearing participants, and only the deaf students employ tense shifting for unconventional, not strictly temporal purposes. These results are explained in terms of language-internal features of the Hebrew system of marking tense that present deaf children with particular difficulties together with the external circumstances in which deaf children growing up in Israel acquire and use spoken language.
References (79)
References
Akamatsu, C.T., Stewart, D.A. & Meyer, C. 2002. Is it time to look beyond teachers' signing behavior? Sign Language Studies 2(3): 230-254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albertini, J.A. & Schley, S. 2003. Writing: Characteristics, instruction, and assessment. In The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Vol. 1, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds), 123-135. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, D. & Reilly, J. 2002. The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7(2): 83-106 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16:133-156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antia, S. & Reed, S. 2005. Written language of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in public schools. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10: 244-255 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arfé, B. & Boscolo, P. 2006. Causal coherence in deaf and hearing students’ written narratives. Discourse Processes 42: 271-300 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arfé, B., Dockrell, J. & Berninger, W.V. (eds), 2014. Writing Development in Children with Hearing Loss, Dyslexia, or Oral Language Problems: Implications for Assessment and Instruction. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayhan A. Aksu-Koç & von Stutterheim, C. (eds.) 1994. Temporal relations in narrative: Simultaneity. In Relating Events in Narrative: A Cross-linguistic Developmental Study, R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (eds), 393-455. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1999. From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. State of the art article. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(3): 341–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berent, G.P. 2009. The interlanguage development of deaf and hearing learners of L2 English: Parallelism via minimalism. In The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 523-543. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: Universities Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Form and function in developing narrative abilities. In Social interaction, social context, and language, D.I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (eds.), 343-367. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. In Children’s Language, Vol. 10, A. Aksu-Koç, C. Johnson & K. Nelson (eds), 1-31. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Acquiring and expressing temporality in Hebrew: A T/(M/A) Language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 11(2): 2-29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman R.A. & Katzenberger I. 2004. Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes 38: 58-94 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. & Neeman, Y. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In Relating Events in Narrative: Across Linguistic Developmental Perspective, R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (eds), 285-328. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. & Nir-Sagiv, B. 2004. Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 31: 339-380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 43(2):79-120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. & Slobin, D.I. (eds.) 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: Across Linguistic Developmental Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, D.V.M. 1983. Comprehension of English syntax by profoundly deaf children. Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry 24: 415-434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blamey, P.J. 2003. Development of spoken language by deaf children. In The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language and Education, Vol.1, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds), 232-246. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochner, J.H. & Albertini, J.A. 1988. Language varieties in the deaf population and their acquisition by children and adults. In Language Learning and Deafness, M. Strong (ed.), 3-48. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinkley, D. 2011. Supporting Deaf Children and Young People: Strategies for Intervention, Inclusion and Improvement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Ravid, D. & Most, T. 2001. Narrative abilities of hearing impaired children age 6-7:6 in script and in narrative compared to hearing children. Speech and Hearing, The Israeli Association of Speech Pathologists 23: 147-165. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 1986. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. 2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27(2): 164–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everhart, V.S. & Marschark, M. 1988. Linguistic flexibility in signed and written language productions of deaf children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 46: 174-193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabbretti, D., Volterra, V. & Pontecorvo, C. 1998. Written language abilities in deaf Italians. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 3: 231-244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, N. & Szterman, R. 2006. Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal Of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16:212-235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 2010. Bilingualism, biculturalism, and deafness. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13(2): 133-145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grushkin, D.A. 1998. Why shouldn't Sam read? Toward a new paradigm for literacy and the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 3(3): 179-201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herzberg, O. 2010. Early Morphosyntactic and Lexical Development in Young Hearing Impaired Hebrew-speaking Children with Cochlear Implants Compared to Normally Hearing Peers. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2003. Children’s Discourse: Person, Space and Time Across Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12, T. Givón (ed.), 213-242. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Thompson, S.A. 1980. Transitivity in syntax and discourse. Language 56(2): 251-299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunt, K. 1965. Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels [NCTE Research report No. 3]. Champaign IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inscoe, J.R., Odell, A., Archbold, S. & Nikolopoulos, T. 2009. Expressive spoken language development in deaf children with cochlear implants who are beginning formal education, Journal of Deafness & Education International 11(1): 39-55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klecan-Aker, J. & Blondeau, R. 1990. An examination of the written stories of hearing-impaired school-age children. The Volta Review 92: 275-282.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupersmitt, J.R. 2006. Temporality in Texts: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study of Form–Function Relations in Narrative and Expository Discourse. PhD dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Moving on and off the timeline in narratives of personal experience written in three languages: A form-function developmental study. Linguistics 53(6): 1303-1309 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helm (ed.), 12-43. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture and Space, K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds), 155-170. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marschark, M., Mouradian, V. & Halas, M. 1994. Discourse rules in the language productions of deaf and hearing children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 57: 89-107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marschark, M. & H. Knoors. 2012. Educating deaf children: Language, cognition and learning. Journal of Deafness & Education International 14(3): 136-160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marschark, M., P.E. Spencer, J. Adams, & P. Sapere. 2011. Teaching to the Strengths and Needs of Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Children. European Journal of Special Needs Education 26(1): 17-23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayberry, R.I. 2007. When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(3): 537-549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayberry, R.I. & Squires, B. 2006. Sign language acquisition. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics 11, 2nd edn, 739–43. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, C. 2007. What really matters in the early literacy development of deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(4): 411-431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The demands of writing and the deaf writer. In The Oxford Handbook of Deaf studies, Language and Education, Vol. 2, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds), 144-155. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, I. 1999. A perfect marker in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 2(1): 41-60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The linguistic input of children with hearing impairment in Israel. In Issues in Education and Mainstreaming of Children with Hearing Impairment in Israel, T. Most & D. Ringwald, (eds), 139-183. Tel Aviv: Mofet Publications. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, I., Kupersmitt, J., Yitzhaki, A. & Katz, A. 2012. The expression of temporality in narratives written by deaf children compared with narratives of their hearing counterparts. Speech and Hearing 31: 1-20. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, I. & Sandler, W. 2008. A Language in Space: The Story of Israeli Sign Language. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.E. & Karchmer, M.A. 2004. Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2):138-163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 2000. Discourse cohesion in sign and speech. International Journal of Bilingualism 4: 279-300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musselman, C. & Szanto, G. 1998. The written language of deaf adolescents: Patterns of performance. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 3: 245-256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, P. 1998. Literacy and Deafness: The Development of Reading, Writing and Literate Thought. Needham Heights MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Language and Deafness, 3rd edn. San Diego CA: Singular.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petitto, L.A. & Marentette, P.F. 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science 251(5000): 1493–1496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quigley, S.P. & King C.M. 1980. Syntactic performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics 1: 329-356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quigley, S.P., Montanelli, D.S. and R.B. Wilbur. 1976. Some aspects of the verb system In the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19: 536-550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramirez, N.J., Lieberman, A.M. & Mayberry, R.I. 2012. The initial stages of first-language acquisition begun in adolescence: When late looks early. Journal of Child Language 39(5):1-24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22: 779-809.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenstein, O. 2001. ISL—A Topic Prominent Language. MA Thesis. University of Haifa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C.S. 1994. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandbank, A. 2004. Writing Narrative texts: A Crosslinguistic and Developmental Study. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (eds), 70-96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21(4): 360–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traxler, C. 2000. The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edn. National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 5: 337–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Beijsterveldt, L.M., & van Hell, J.G. 2009. Evaluative expression in deaf children’s written narratives. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 44(5): 675-692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Beijsterveldt, L.M. & van Hell, J.G. 2012. The development of deaf writers' tense marking in narrative and expository text: a bimodal bilingual perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15: 128-144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weist, R.M., Wysocka, H. & Lyytinen, P. 1991. A cross-linguistic perspective on the development of temporal systems. Journal of Child Language 18(1): 67-92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, R.B. & Petersen, L. 1998. Modality interactions of speech and signing in simultaneous communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41(1): 200-212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winston, E.A. 1995. Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames. In Language, Gesture and Space. K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds), 87-114. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. & Snyder, L. 1985. Form and meaning in the written language of hearing-impaired children. The Volta Review 87: 75-90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue