Cover not available

In:Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 19] 2016
► pp. 201–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The nature of CDS in Hebrew

Frequent frames in a morphologically rich language

 | Hebrew University Jerusalem
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.19.07arn
The chapter explores the distribution and content of frequent frames – recurring multiword sequences – appearing at the start of utterances in speech directed to young Hebrew-speaking children. Previous work has documented the existence and prevalence of such frames in several languages (English, German, and Russian). Here, analysis of a dense corpus of Hebrew child-directed speech was undertaken with two goals in mind. The first aims at examining the distribution of multiword elements in Hebrew child-directed speech, to ascertain whether frequent frames are found in a morphologically rich language like Hebrew and, if so, to see how pervasive they are compared to other languages, and how consistent across different caretakers. The second goal is to explore the content of frequent frames in Hebrew to address such questions as: Do they provide children with relevant morphological and syntactic information? Are they frequent enough to be employed in learning? Results show that frequent frames do occur in Hebrew, that they are relatively consistent across caretakers, and that they illustrate a range of grammatical relations. These findings expand our understanding of frequent frames in general, while also adding to the relatively sparse information on the nature of child-directed speech in Hebrew.
References (57)
References
Abbot-Smith, K. & Tomasello, M. 2006. Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review 23: 275–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albert, A., MacWhinney, B., Nir, B. & Wintner, S. 2013. The Hebrew CHILDES corpus: Transcription and morphological analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation 47(4), 973–1005. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S. & Berman, R. 2003. The emergence of grammar: Early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language 30(4): 845–877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, I. 2010. Starting Big: The Role of Multiword Phrases in Language Learning and Use. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, I. & Snider, N. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 67–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, I. & Clark, E.V. 2011. Why brush your teeth is better than teeth – Children’s word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development 72: 107–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, I. & Cohen Priva, U. 2013. More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech 56(3): 349–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bannard, C. & Matthews, D. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19(3): 241–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bannard, C., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. 2009. Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(41): 17284–9.
Berman, R. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: University Publication Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. The acquisition of Hebrew. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition D.I. Slobin (ed.), 255–371. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. On acquiring an (S)VO language: Subjectless sentences in children’s Hebrew. Linguistics 286: 1135–1166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. (2002). Crosslinguistic comparisons in later language development. In The Diversity of Languages and Language Learning. S. Strömqvist (ed.), 25-44. Lund: Center for Languages and Literature.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. & Ravid, D. 2000. Research in acquisition of Israeli Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. Hebrew Studies 41: 83–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. & Lustigman, L. 2014. Emergent clause-combining in adult-child interactional contexts. In Language in Interaction. Studies in Honor of Eve V. Clark [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 12], I. Arnon, M. Casillas, C. Kurumada, & B. Estigarribia (eds) 281–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bod, R. 2009. From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science 335: 752–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bracha Nir, B.M.S.W. 2010. A Morphologically-Analyzed CHILDES Corpus of Hebrew. LREC . <[URL]>
Bybee, J. 1998. The Emergent Lexicon. In The 34th Chicago Linguistic Society CLS 34: The panels, 421-435. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27(6): 843–873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P.W. & Jackendoff, R. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Da̧browska, E. & Lieven, E. 2005. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3): 437–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. 2007. Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 252: 108–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elman, J. 2009. On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science 33: 547–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1973. Complex NP’s, resumptive pronouns, and word order in Hebrew. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, C.T. Corum, T., C. Smith-Stark & A. Wieser (eds),135–146. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. On the VS order in Israeli Hebrew: Pragmatics and typological change. In Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole (ed.), 153–181. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E. & Levine, S. 2002. Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45(3): 337–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A. & Lieven, E. 2009. Can input explain children’s me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language 36(5): 1091–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E.V.M., Pine, J.M. & Baldwin, G. 1997. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24(1): 187–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J. & Tomasello, M. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30(2): 333–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. 2008. Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In, Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (eds), 168–196. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E., Salomo, D. & Tomasello M. 2009. Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3): 481-508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120(11): 2546–2556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language 41(Suppl. 1): 48–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools For Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J.L. 2010. Emergence in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science 2(4): 751–770. <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mintz, T.H. 2003. Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition 90(1): 91–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naigles, L.R. & Hoff-Ginsburg, E. 1998. Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children’s early verb use. Journal of Child Language 25(1): 95–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, A.M. 1977. Language learning strategies : Does the whole equal the sum of the parts ? Language 53(3): 560–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1999. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. New York NY: HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K. & Thorpe, K. 2010. The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science 34(6): 909–957. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramscar, M. (2013). Suffixing, prefixing, and the functional order of regularities in meaningful strings. Psihologija 46(4): 377–396. <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., Dressler, W.U., Nir, B., Korecky-Kröll, K., Souman, A., Rehfeldt, K., Laaha, S., Bertl, J., Basbøll, H. & Gillis, S. 2009. Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: History, methods, perspectives [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 6], H. Behrens (ed.), 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M.H. 2007. Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 60(2): 161–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, C.F. & Pine, J.M. 2000. Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: “What children do know?” Journal of Child Language 27(01): 157–181. <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidl, A. & Johnson, E.K. 2006. Infant word segmentation revisited: Edge alignment facilitates target extraction. Developmental Science 9(6): 565–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K. & Lieven, E. 2009. Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German, and English child-directed speech. Cognitive Science 33(1): 75–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theakston, A.L, Lieven, E.V.M, Pine, J.M. & Rowland, C.F. 2001. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. Journal of Child Language 28: 127-152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G. & Westbury, C. 2011. Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61(2): 569–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uziel-Karl, S. 2001. A Multidimensional Perspective on the Acquisition of Verb Argument Structure. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Acquisition of verb structure from a developmental perspective: Evidence from child Hebrew. In The Acquisition of Verbs and their Grammar: The Effect of Particular Languages, N. Gagarina & I. Gülzow (eds), 33: 15–44. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bunzeck, Bastian & Holger Diessel
2025. The richness of the stimulus: Constructional variation and development in child-directed speech. First Language 45:2 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Theakston, Anna & Elena Lieven
2017. Multiunit Sequences in First Language Acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3 ► pp. 588 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue