In:The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters
Edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec
[Topics in Humor Research 7] 2018
► pp. 205–228
Chapter 9No child’s play
A philosophical pragmatic view of overt pretense as a vehicle for conversational humor
Published online: 5 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.09dyn
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.09dyn
Abstract
This chapter sheds some light on the different interpretations of the notion of pretense across disciplines. Attention is paid primarily to the pragmatic and philosophical literature where pretense is used with regard to two linguistic notions: irony and deception. These are here conceptualized as overt pretense and covert pretense respectively. Both of these may serve humorous purposes. The principal objective of this chapter is to examine the interface between overt pretense and conversational humor, including humorous irony. This is done by critically revisiting the relevant literature on humorous pretense and by elucidating a number of forms and specific mechanisms such humor may take, as well as functions it may perform. The discussion is illustrated with extracts taken from the American television series House. This chapter thus tacitly supports the idea of verisimilar language use in fictional interactions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Covert pretense and humor
- 3.Overt pretense and irony
- 3.1Overt pretense and humorous irony
- 4.Overt pretense and nonironic conversational humor
- 5.Summary and final comments
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (82)
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Pretending. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume 32: 279–294. London: Harrison and Sons.
Austin, John. (1958). Pretending. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume, 32, 261–278. London: Harrison and Sons.
Brône, Geert. (2008). Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 2027–2061.
Camp, Elizabeth. (2012). Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs, 46, 587–634.
Carruthers, Peter. (2006). Why pretend? In Shaun Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of imagination (pp. 8–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castelfranchi, Cristiano & Isabella Poggi. (1994). Lying as pretending to give information. In Herman Parret (Ed.), Pretending to communicate (pp. 276–291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chovanec, Jan. (2012). Conversational humor and joint fantisizing in online journalism. In Jan Chovanec & Isabel Ermida (Eds.), Language and humor in the media (pp. 131–169). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Clark, Herbert & Gerrig, Richard. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126.
Clark, Herbert & Mija Van Der Wege. (2001). Imagination in discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 772–786). Blackwell Publishers.
Coupland, Nikolas. (2004). Stylized deception. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (Eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 249–274). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2006). Why irony is pretense. In Shaun Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of imagination (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dynel, Marta. (2009). Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
. (2011a). Stranger than fiction. A few methodological notes on linguistic research in film discourse. Brno Studies in English, 37, 41–61.
. (2011b). “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1628–1644.
. (2011c). I’ll be there for you: On participation-based sitcom humor. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 311–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2011d). Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 217–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2013a). Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. The European Journal of Humor Research, 1(1), 22–60.
. (2013b). Impoliteness as disaffiliative humor in film talk. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 105–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2013c). Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 403–431.
. (2013d). When does irony tickle the hearer? Towards capturing the characteristics of humorous irony. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 298–320). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2014). Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 619–639.
. (2016). With or without intentions: Accountability and (un)intentional humor in film talk. Journal of Pragmatics.
. (2017b). Impoliteness and telecinematic discourse. In Miriam A. Locher & Andreas H. Jucker (Eds.), Pragmatics of fiction. Mouton de Gruyter handbooks of pragmatics, Volume 12. (pp. 455–487). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (to appear). Lying and humor. In Jörg Meibauer (Ed.), Oxford handbook of lying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fein, Greta. (1981). Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095–1118.
Friedman, Ori, Neary, Karen, Burnstein, Corinna & Leslie, Alan. (2010). Is young children’s recognition of pretense metarepresentational or merely behavioral? Evidence from 2- and 3-year-olds’ understanding of pretend sounds and speech. Cognition, 115(2), 314–319.
Garmendia, Joana. (2013). Irony: making as if we pretend to echo. In Istvan Kecskes & Jesus Romero-Trillo (Eds). Research trends in intercultural pragmatics (pp. 85–104). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gendler, Tamar. (2003). On the relation between pretense and belief. In Matthew Kieran (Ed.), Imagination, philosophy, and the arts. London: Routledge.
. (2013). Imagination. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition). URL=<[URL]>.
Gerrig, Richard. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay in the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Grice, Herbert Paul. (1989a). Logic and conversation. In Studies in the way of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. [Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & H. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press; Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In D. Davison & G. Harman (eds.), The logic of grammar, 64–75. Dickenson: Encino.]
. (1989b). Further notes on logic and conversation. In Studies in the way of words, 41–57. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Grice, Herbert Paul. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.]
Haugh, Michael. (2016). “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 120–136.
Hay, Jennifer. (1995). Gender and humor: Beyond a joke. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington. Unpublished MA thesis.
. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 709–742.
. (2001). The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55–82.
Howes, Carollee, Olivia Unger & Catherine Matheson. (1992). The collaborative construction of pretend: Social pretend play functions. Albany: Suny Press.
Kapogianni, Eleni. (2011). Irony via ‘surrealism’. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kotthoff, Helga. (2007). Oral genres of humor: On the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring. Pragmatics, 17, 263–296.
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21.
Lampert, Martin & Susan Ervin-Tripp. (2006). Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 51–72.
Langland-Hassan, Peter. (2012). Pretense, imagination, and belief: The Single Attitude Theory. Philosophical Studies, 159, 155–179.
Lillard, Angeline. (1994). Making sense of pretense. In Charlie Lewis & Peter Mitchell (Eds.), Children’s early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 211–234). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nash, Walter. (1985). The language of humor: Style and technique in comic discourse. London: Longman.
Norrick, Neal. (1989). Intertextuality in humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2, 117–139.
Pagin, Peter. (2015). Assertion. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), URL=<[URL]>.
Peirce, Charles. (1934). Belief and judgment. In Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers, vol. 5, (pp. 376–387). Cambridge: Harvard.
Rakoczy, Hannes. (2008). Pretense as individual and collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 23, 499–517.
. (2007). Indexicality, context and pretense: A speech-act theoretic account. In Noel Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Advances in pragmatics (pp. 213–229). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rossen-Knill, Debora & Richard Henry. (1997). The pragmatics of verbal parody. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 719–752.
Rothbart, Mary & Diana Pien. (1977). Elephants and marshmallows: A theoretical synthesis of incongruity-resolution and arousal theories of humor. In Chapman, Antony J. & Hugh C. Foot (Eds.), It’s a funny thing, humor (pp. 37–40). Oxford: Pergamon.
Ruch, Willibald. (1992). Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3WD humor test. In Charles Spielberger & James N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, vol. 9 (pp. 27–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rudanko, Juhani. (2006). Aggravated impoliteness and two types of speaker intention in an episode in Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 829–841.
Searle, John. (1975a). The logical status of fictional discourse. New literary history, Vol. VI, No.2.
. (1975b). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Keith Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. VII, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sinkeviciute, Valeria. (2013). Decoding encoded (im)politeness: “Cause on my teasing you can depend”. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 263–288). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Soames, Scott. (2008). Drawing the line between meaning and implicature – and relating both to assertion. Noûs, 42, 440–465.
Sobel, David. (2009). Enabling conditions and children’s understanding of pretense. Cognition, 113(2), 177–188.
Stallone, Leticia & Michael Haugh. (2017). Joint fantasizing as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions. Language & Communication 55: 10–23.
Van Leeuwen, Neil. (2011). Imagination is where the action is. The Journal of Philosophy, 108(2), 55–77.
Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts & Geert Brône. (2006). The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19, 305–340.
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. (2004). Words in the way of Truth. Truthfulness, deception, lying across cultures and disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.
Vincent, Jocelyne & Cristiano Castelfranchi. (1981). On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth. In Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà & Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics: Proceedings of the conference on pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, 1979 (pp. 749–777). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2024. Multimodal joint fantasising as a category‑implicative and category‑relations‑implicative action in online
multi‑party interaction. Internet Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Dynel, Marta & Andrew S. Ross
Indìo Massimo Poppi, Fabio
Dynel, Marta & Fabio I. M. Poppi
Dynel, Marta
2018. Theoretically onMock Politeness in English and Italian. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Dynel, Marta & Fabio IM Poppi
Gibbs, Raymond W., Patrawat Samermit & Christopher R. Karzmark
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
