References (82)
References
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Pretending. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume 32: 279–294. London: Harrison and Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John. (1958). Pretending. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume, 32, 261–278. London: Harrison and Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. (1983). Asserting. Noûs, 17, 637–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brône, Geert. (2008). Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 2027–2061. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth. (2012). Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs, 46, 587–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter. (2006). Why pretend? In Shaun Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of imagination (pp. 8–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castelfranchi, Cristiano & Isabella Poggi. (1994). Lying as pretending to give information. In Herman Parret (Ed.), Pretending to communicate (pp. 276–291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. (2012). Conversational humor and joint fantisizing in online journalism. In Jan Chovanec & Isabel Ermida (Eds.), Language and humor in the media (pp. 131–169). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Gerrig, Richard. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Mija Van Der Wege. (2001). Imagination in discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 772–786). Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. (2004). Stylized deception. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (Eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 249–274). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (1990). The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Narratives and narrators: A philosophy of stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Why irony is pretense. In Shaun Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of imagination (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. (2009). Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011a). Stranger than fiction. A few methodological notes on linguistic research in film discourse. Brno Studies in English, 37, 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011b). “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1628–1644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011c). I’ll be there for you: On participation-based sitcom humor. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 311–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011d). Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 217–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013a). Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. The European Journal of Humor Research, 1(1), 22–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013b). Impoliteness as disaffiliative humor in film talk. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 105–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013c). Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 403–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013d). When does irony tickle the hearer? Towards capturing the characteristics of humorous irony. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 298–320). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 619–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016). With or without intentions: Accountability and (un)intentional humor in film talk. Journal of Pragmatics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017a). But seriously: On conversational humor and (un)truthfulness. Lingua 197: 83–102.
. (2017b). Impoliteness and telecinematic discourse. In Miriam A. Locher & Andreas H. Jucker (Eds.), Pragmatics of fiction. Mouton de Gruyter handbooks of pragmatics, Volume 12. (pp. 455–487). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017c). The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics, 1(1), 3–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (to appear). Lying and humor. In Jörg Meibauer (Ed.), Oxford handbook of lying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fein, Greta. (1981). Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095–1118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Ori, Neary, Karen, Burnstein, Corinna & Leslie, Alan. (2010). Is young children’s recognition of pretense metarepresentational or merely behavioral? Evidence from 2- and 3-year-olds’ understanding of pretend sounds and speech. Cognition, 115(2), 314–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. (2013). Irony: making as if we pretend to echo. In Istvan Kecskes & Jesus Romero-Trillo (Eds). Research trends in intercultural pragmatics (pp. 85–104). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gendler, Tamar. (2003). On the relation between pretense and belief. In Matthew Kieran (Ed.), Imagination, philosophy, and the arts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Imagination. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition). URL=<[URL]>.
Gerrig, Richard. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay in the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. (1989a). Logic and conversation. In Studies in the way of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. [Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & H. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press; Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In D. Davison & G. Harman (eds.), The logic of grammar, 64–75. Dickenson: Encino.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1989b). Further notes on logic and conversation. In Studies in the way of words, 41–57. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Grice, Herbert Paul. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. (2016). “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 120–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. (1995). Gender and humor: Beyond a joke. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington. Unpublished MA thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 709–742. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howes, Carollee, Olivia Unger & Catherine Matheson. (1992). The collaborative construction of pretend: Social pretend play functions. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni. (2011). Irony via ‘surrealism’. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Martin & Susan Ervin-Tripp. (2006). Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langland-Hassan, Peter. (2012). Pretense, imagination, and belief: The Single Attitude Theory. Philosophical Studies, 159, 155–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). What it is to pretend. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 95(1): 397–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1978). Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15, 37–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillard, Angeline. (1994). Making sense of pretense. In Charlie Lewis & Peter Mitchell (Eds.), Children’s early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 211–234). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, Walter. (1985). The language of humor: Style and technique in comic discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun & Stich, Stephen. (2000). A cognitive theory of pretense. Cognition, 74, 115–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. (1989). Intertextuality in humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2, 117–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. (2003). Engaging humor. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pagin, Peter. (2015). Assertion. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), URL=<[URL]>.
Parret, Herman. (Ed.) (1994). Pretending to communicate. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. (1934). Belief and judgment. In Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers, vol. 5, (pp. 376–387). Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakoczy, Hannes. (2008). Pretense as individual and collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 23, 499–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Indexicality, context and pretense: A speech-act theoretic account. In Noel Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Advances in pragmatics (pp. 213–229). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossen-Knill, Debora & Richard Henry. (1997). The pragmatics of verbal parody. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 719–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothbart, Mary & Diana Pien. (1977). Elephants and marshmallows: A theoretical synthesis of incongruity-resolution and arousal theories of humor. In Chapman, Antony J. & Hugh C. Foot (Eds.), It’s a funny thing, humor (pp. 37–40). Oxford: Pergamon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald. (1992). Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3WD humor test. In Charles Spielberger & James N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, vol. 9 (pp. 27–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani. (2006). Aggravated impoliteness and two types of speaker intention in an episode in Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 829–841. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. (1975a). The logical status of fictional discourse. New literary history, Vol. VI, No.2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1975b). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Keith Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. VII, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel. (2002). Speech play and verbal art. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria. (2013). Decoding encoded (im)politeness: “Cause on my teasing you can depend”. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory (pp. 263–288). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. (2008). Drawing the line between meaning and implicature – and relating both to assertion. Noûs, 42, 440–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sobel, David. (2009). Enabling conditions and children’s understanding of pretense. Cognition, 113(2), 177–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokke, Andreas. (2013). Lying and asserting. Journal of Philosophy, 110, 33–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stallone, Leticia & Michael Haugh. (2017). Joint fantasizing as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions. Language & Communication 55: 10–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Neil. (2011). Imagination is where the action is. The Journal of Philosophy, 108(2), 55–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts & Geert Brône. (2006). The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19, 305–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. (2004). Words in the way of Truth. Truthfulness, deception, lying across cultures and disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Jocelyne & Cristiano Castelfranchi. (1981). On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth. In Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà & Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics: Proceedings of the conference on pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, 1979 (pp. 749–777). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Dynel, Marta & Andrew S. Ross
2021. You Don’t Fool Me: On Scams, Scambaiting, Deception, and Epistemological Ambiguity at R/scambait on Reddit. Social Media + Society 7:3 DOI logo
Indìo Massimo Poppi, Fabio
2021. Sancte et sapienter. Pragmatics and Society 12:3  pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta & Fabio I. M. Poppi
2020. Arcana imperii*. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2018. Theoretically onMock Politeness in English and Italian. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta & Fabio IM Poppi
2018. In tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:4  pp. 382 ff. DOI logo
Gibbs, Raymond W., Patrawat Samermit & Christopher R. Karzmark
2018. Humor, irony, and the body. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1  pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Jörg Meibauer
2018. The Oxford Handbook of Lying, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Preface. In The Oxford Handbook of Lying,  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. List of figures and tables. In The Oxford Handbook of Lying,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Lying,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue